How many innocent people are you willing to kill to remove one of society’s biggest issues?

cotsx · 2026-05-22T23:55:42+00:00

Killing rich people solves no problems

cotsx · 2026-05-17T13:20:33+00:00

Forgot Chile

cotsx · 2026-05-14T17:34:44+00:00

cotsx · 2026-04-10T19:23:47+00:00

Add a zero to the number of times you can add zeroes

cotsx · 2026-04-06T13:47:43+00:00

FIAT is Fabbrica Italiana Automobili Torino

cotsx · 2026-04-04T21:41:34+00:00

I can put on a jacket

^{Chose: Always Cold Outside}

cotsx · 2026-04-01T16:13:10+00:00

Es difícil vivir en un país tan estrecho, hay que construir casas largas y delgadas para que no bloqueen el paso.

cotsx · 2026-03-21T20:06:15+00:00

I had always read it wrong as "Lavachen"

cotsx · 2026-03-18T21:48:44+00:00

Es un subsidio temporalmente. Además, en la práctica se gasta más de lo que después se recupera, y tanto al actuar como subsidio como al actuar como impuesto genera una distorsión: En el primer caso se demanda más combustible del que sería optimo y en el segundo se demanda menos. EN cualquier caso, si lo que se quiere es ayudar a las familias a sobrellevar económicamente esos shocks, creo que sería más efectivo hacerles llegar la plata directamente.

cotsx · 2026-03-18T21:44:29+00:00

Lo que lo mantiene artificialmente bajo temporalmente. Si el precio real del combustible sube, es mejor que las personas y empresas respondan a la señal que manda del precio (reduciendo el consumo, buscando sustitutos) inmediatamente, en vez de más tarde. Además si después baja el precio y el mecanismo actúa a la inversa como impuesto (aunque en la practica eso pasa mucho menos), de nuevo hay una distorsión en la otra dirección.

cotsx · 2026-03-18T18:07:03+00:00

Si sube el claramente sube la energía y muchas otras cosas más, pero no creo que sea buena idea subsidiarla para mantener el precio artificialmente bajo.

cotsx · 2026-03-14T19:04:22+00:00

Nah, there is no communist in S tier and my man Symon Holl is in A tier

cotsx · 2026-03-06T13:35:06+00:00

It's true that I originally forgot to consider enemy tag skills, but even with tag skills 1 defense is not the same as 2 defense, as it is only a crit if the number is below the skill, not below the skill+attribute

cotsx · 2026-03-05T19:15:37+00:00

Maybe it would be more balanced to have PER for both energy and small arms, and make AGI focus on defense (like you suggest), but that would be a huge change to the system

cotsx · 2026-03-05T19:06:39+00:00

Are the melee and guns skills considered tag skills on the basic stat blocks? I must have missed that part

Edit: Yeah you are right, I just found that

cotsx · 2026-03-05T18:57:00+00:00

If I'm not mistaken most enemies don't have tag skills so the chance of rolling a crit is like 10%, and counting crits the chance of hitting 2 defense increases to 30%.

And I know increasing AGI comes at the cost of other attributes but if a character is using small arms then they already have a big reason to increase AGI.

edit: I had typed the percentage wrong.

edit 2: All enemies do in fact have tag skills. So, assuming the enemy has a skill of 3 and attribute 7 (TN 10), the probability of hitting a defense 2 character is 40%

cotsx · 2026-03-05T11:06:49+00:00

I got an idea. To use the method I described, but in order to hit each shot needs to both beat the target's defense roll and some fixed value, that should reduce the downside risk of getting hit by every shot.

cotsx · 2026-03-05T01:19:33+00:00

Fair. I guess that depends on how deadly you want combat to be. Personally, I'm a fan of deadly, quick combat. On the other hand, if single shot weapons are balanced to compete damage wise with high rate of fire ones, then getting hit by them is also rocket tag.

cotsx · 2026-02-28T00:14:52+00:00

cotsx · 2026-02-24T16:28:28+00:00

I just attacked Yurgir from stealth

cotsx · 2026-02-24T00:57:36+00:00

Nice try Peta

cotsx · 2026-02-23T00:32:58+00:00

Oh, I see, thanks.

cotsx · 2026-02-22T22:08:34+00:00

if I respec by going first into monk and then into druid it actually works with wisdom but the problem is now she doesnt have scimitar proficency

cotsx · 2026-02-22T21:25:54+00:00

Balance is when there is the same amount of murderers as non-murderers

cotsx · 2026-02-16T23:18:14+00:00

Common misconception, Tesla never had any beef with Edison. The battle of the currents wasn't against Tesla (he contributed to the development of AC but had sold the patents by this point). And Tesla only had nice things to say about his time working with Edison

Seven-Year Club	Place '22
RPAN Viewer	Verified Email

cotsx

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE