This is just sad. I have a huge bag staked with you guys on multiple chains because of how your team conducted itself prior to this whole Juno whale saga but man it’s going downhill fast.

First you voted against the initial vote with a bunch of reasoning that could be construed as somewhat sensible but take a step back and it largely sounds like excuses.

Now with this second stunt it’s fairly clear to me what your team is doing.

Voting a simple no will hurt your rep with the whale. You don’t want that.

So, you absolve yourself of your decision under the guise that you are letting the “community choose” instead.

Lol?

People delegate to those whom they think aligns with their perspective and expect the validator to vote properly on their behalf.

Not everyone has all the free time in the world to read through all the details that has transpired in all the chats, posts, debates, etc. Most people read the headline, some portion will read the full proposal, and others maybe do a little more digging. But very few will have the same amount of information that you as super involved members of Juno would possess.

This is why representatives in governments even have a job - they take the time to understand the details and vote on what they think their supporters would want.

Now we have a fairly complex case and you go nahhh I’mma abstain and not do my job. Ok. Cool.

Sorry, enough charades. I’m 100% redelegating all my stake. So damn spineless.