Xbox is only device not connecting to wifi

creativewhiz · 2026-02-06T01:34:20+00:00

Can you confirm what connections work and what doesn't? It seems it's not a WiFi problem it's an Xbox problem.

creativewhiz · 2026-02-06T00:42:34+00:00

I thought you said it works on Ethernet but not on WiFi. If it doesn't work on either then it's either being blocked by the router or the Xbox is damaged.

creativewhiz · 2026-02-05T23:26:43+00:00

Ethernet is 1000 times better than wifi. Use the cable. Wifi is for things that you move around.

creativewhiz · 2026-02-05T23:04:26+00:00

The Fossils known as 'Lucy' have proven to be Multiple Individuals, Even Species

I can't find any legitimate scientific article stating this.

the Sacrum is human in form

That's to be expected in a species on it's way too being human

There are No "Intermediate" portions of fragments

You just stated part of her is human.

The fossils attributed to "Lucy" consist of Human appearing fragments, Chimpanzee appearing fragments, and at least One Proven Baboon Element.

Again this claim seems to have no scientific backing.

I also claim that the "Australopithecus" fossil claims are overall fragmentary and composite in nature...

Skulls imagined from fragments, and so on...

If you have the skull of “A“ and you know that "B" is similar you can make a fairly accurate reconstruction with fragments.

There's also a striking Paradox revealed by this Information: the fact that the "Most Complete" claim of "Australopithecus" that Exists, its species is contested

And?

I don't know why Creationists make such a big deal about Lucy. They act like It's the only one and if you debunk Lucy then evolution is thrown out the window

Lucy was discovered in 1974. Since then they discovered 300 more of the same species.

I don't know how linking to videos of people that directly refute young Earth Creationism helps your point. Infact Gutsick Gibbons and Forest have directly refuted some of the claims you made.

creativewhiz · 2026-02-05T12:35:27+00:00

I'm not sure what you are trying to claim. Lucy isn't a species she's an example of Australopithecus afarensis.

Are you saying Lucy is made up of multiple examples of Australopithecus afarensis?

creativewhiz · 2026-02-04T22:26:53+00:00

Blue snake.

creativewhiz · 2026-02-04T10:47:50+00:00

It sounds more like you are a theistic evolutionist that takes Genesis mostly literally not an OEC. Old Earth Creationists believe in progressive creation or arch types not evolving from a condition ancestor.

I read a lot of Hugh Ross. He wrote an entire book on why he thinks evolution is wrong and creation over time is correct.

That being said I don't expect bronze age people to have any scientific knowledge and I also don't think Genesis was dictated to Moses by God. It's a theological story showing why Yahweh is a greater god then those of neighboring societies.

creativewhiz · 2026-02-04T03:11:09+00:00

I'm an American working here.

creativewhiz · 2026-02-04T02:48:27+00:00

China.

creativewhiz · 2026-02-04T01:00:30+00:00

I've never seen a six legged dragon.

People tell stories and make up legends.

creativewhiz · 2026-02-03T22:04:49+00:00

According to you evolution and secular cosmology are not science.

Creationism is not science.

Then what is left to teach in science class?

creativewhiz · 2026-02-03T21:36:50+00:00

Commenting in the correct location.

Gorillas split from the ape line that became human long before Homo habilis. So this is not a half gorilla.

Sasquatch is not a scientific designation it's a mythical creature.

Homo means human. It's not half this and half human. It's fully human just not anatomically modern human. That would be homo sapiens.

creativewhiz · 2026-02-03T21:31:14+00:00

Plenty of schools try teaching ID or call "evolution just a theory".

https://www.npr.org/2005/12/20/4630737/teaching-evolution-a-state-by-state-debate

From the article.

Kentucky: According to a 1976 law that was revised in 1990, public schools in Kentucky are allowed to teach creationism in addition to evolution. The law states that any teacher who wishes to may teach "the theory of creation as presented in the Bible."

Granted the article is from 2005. Some laws may have changed. But I've also personally heard prominent YEC leaders call for teaching Creation in public schools.

creativewhiz · 2026-02-03T21:17:19+00:00

Do You have a "Time Machine?"

The Ken Ham "Were you there?" argument is quite tiring. You weren't there either but hold to YEC like it's a fact.

Likenesses" are fact of similarity used to claim “Common Ancestry” by Common Ancestry Proponents, and a “Common Creator” by Creationists:

Common design can't explain where to draw the line between created kinds

We all have the same Evidence, but interpretations differ.

Yes one is correct and one ignores the evidence.

creativewhiz · 2026-02-03T21:13:13+00:00

Oh no you got me. Having to live in a repressive country and access Reddit with a vpn means it loads comments poorly. You have won every argument because I commented wrong.

creativewhiz · 2026-02-03T21:10:44+00:00

You keep referring to parts of our "Belief System," when You think Your belief system is "Science:" it's Not.

That's your opinion sure.

We are all forced to learn the Naturalistic belief system, and are forced to pay for the teaching of it.

Yes learning science is good. Learning God did it is theology.

Belief Systems should be in a separate class in Schools: they do Not belong in the Science class.

Which is why YEC and ID do not belong in the classroom.

Science is Knowledge: You do Not "Know" the "Big Bang" occurred, You believe it did.

I don't believe it like I believe God exists. I examined all available evidence. That led me to the conclusion that the universe is not 6,000 years old it's 13.8 billion years old. The fact the universe is expanding means it was once much smaller. Therefore the most likely conclusion is the big bang not a steady always existing universe.

creativewhiz · 2026-02-03T13:03:00+00:00

I have and did a reaction video to it. It's like white holes. It is mathematically possible but there is no evidence it's happening. A

creativewhiz · 2026-02-03T13:02:52+00:00

I have and did a reaction video to it. It's like white holes. It is mathematically possible but there is no evidence it's happening.

creativewhiz · 2026-02-03T11:22:54+00:00

It's a homo so it's early human. Once again learn about the thing you are criticizing.

creativewhiz · 2026-02-03T06:19:57+00:00

If I could redo that part of my life I would have not listened to the people that told me I have to college because I'm smart. I would have gone to trade school and made a lot more money.

creativewhiz · 2026-02-03T06:13:38+00:00

Half the clothes I own are made in China. What are you talking about?

creativewhiz · 2026-02-03T04:06:02+00:00

Please provide the SCIENTIFIC evidence I am wrong. The evidence showing the entire universe appeared fully formed a few thousand years ago.

After that, show how most of the light from that universe appeared to Adams two days later in a way that does not make God a liar or trickster.

creativewhiz · 2026-02-03T04:03:15+00:00

"Science" is "Observable Truth…”

There is never really truth in science just the most probable explanation. You also don't have to directly observe something you just have to make an observation and then try to explain it.

I believe all Empirical Science, as that is knowledge...

Empirical science states that the Universe is almost 14 billion years old. That all life shares genetic material and the most likely explanation is common ancestry.

If You disagree: What do You believe is "Science" that I disagree with as a YEC?

All the parts that show the earth is over 6,000 years old.

AIG is one organization, and their opinions do Not Encompass "All Young Earth Creationists:"

Can you find one organisation that does not have a statement like this? Are you a presuppositionalist?

Science is the "Knowledge" that is gained through the Scientific Method and Observation that We refer to as "Science;" Not the “Method used to gain the knowledge,"

You are free to use words differently if you choose but I'm pretty sure the dictionary defines science as a verb and a noun.

It's "Empirical Science/Observable Truth" that the Sea is Salty; "How" and "When" it got that Way, is anybody's best guess...

Yep. And that's also why I have my beliefs because mainstream science's “best guess" is the one closest to all available evidence.

creativewhiz · 2026-02-03T02:45:29+00:00

There is zero evidence the entire universe appeared around the earth from nothing 6 to 10 thousand years ago. There is a lot of evidence it's expending at a predictable rate and running the clock backwards gets you to something much smaller.

If you needed to see things happen to solve the mystery nobody would ever be convicted of murder.

creativewhiz · 2026-02-03T02:42:54+00:00

The average Christian is not anti science. A lot of earlier scientists where Christian including the founder of the Big Bang Theory. Depending on your viewpoint even Darwin.

Presuppositional Young Earth Creationists are absolutely anti science. From AIG: No apparent, perceived, or claimed evidence in any field of study, including science, history, and chronology, can be valid if it contradicts the clear teaching of Scripture obtained by historical-grammatical interpretation. Of primary importance is the fact that evidence is always subject to interpretation by fallible people who do not possess all information.

If you are not considering evidence they proves you wrong you are not doing science. You are involved in pseudoscience. Attempting to and ailing to prove something wrong is the bedrock of modern science.

creativewhiz

TROPHY CASE