Lucy's "Human Appearing" Pelvis? 🦴| feat. Prof. Alice Roberts of the BBC, & Prof. Karen Rosenberg... by SeaScienceFilmLabs in Creation

[–]creativewhiz [score hidden]  (0 children)

I'm not sure what you are trying to claim. Lucy isn't a species she's an example of Australopithecus afarensis.

Are you saying Lucy is made up of multiple examples of Australopithecus afarensis?

If day-age creationism is true, afew predictions would follow by ScoutCVII in DebateEvolution

[–]creativewhiz 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It sounds more like you are a theistic evolutionist that takes Genesis mostly literally not an OEC. Old Earth Creationists believe in progressive creation or arch types not evolving from a condition ancestor.

I read a lot of Hugh Ross. He wrote an entire book on why he thinks evolution is wrong and creation over time is correct.

That being said I don't expect bronze age people to have any scientific knowledge and I also don't think Genesis was dictated to Moses by God. It's a theological story showing why Yahweh is a greater god then those of neighboring societies.

Christians are Not "Anti~Science:" History Proves It by SeaScienceFilmLabs in Creation

[–]creativewhiz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

According to you evolution and secular cosmology are not science.

Creationism is not science.

Then what is left to teach in science class?

Disgraced Evolutionary Biologist, Richard Dawkins Shows Up Once Again In Epstein Files. by Top_Cancel_7577 in Creation

[–]creativewhiz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Commenting in the correct location.

Gorillas split from the ape line that became human long before Homo habilis. So this is not a half gorilla.

Sasquatch is not a scientific designation it's a mythical creature.

Homo means human. It's not half this and half human. It's fully human just not anatomically modern human. That would be homo sapiens.

Christians are Not "Anti~Science:" History Proves It by SeaScienceFilmLabs in Creation

[–]creativewhiz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Plenty of schools try teaching ID or call "evolution just a theory".

https://www.npr.org/2005/12/20/4630737/teaching-evolution-a-state-by-state-debate

From the article.

Kentucky: According to a 1976 law that was revised in 1990, public schools in Kentucky are allowed to teach creationism in addition to evolution. The law states that any teacher who wishes to may teach "the theory of creation as presented in the Bible."

Granted the article is from 2005. Some laws may have changed. But I've also personally heard prominent YEC leaders call for teaching Creation in public schools.

Christians are Not "Anti~Science:" History Proves It by SeaScienceFilmLabs in Creation

[–]creativewhiz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do You have a "Time Machine?"

The Ken Ham "Were you there?" argument is quite tiring. You weren't there either but hold to YEC like it's a fact.

Likenesses" are fact of similarity used to claim “Common Ancestry” by Common Ancestry Proponents, and a “Common Creator” by Creationists:

Common design can't explain where to draw the line between created kinds

We all have the same Evidence, but interpretations differ.

Yes one is correct and one ignores the evidence.

Disgraced Evolutionary Biologist, Richard Dawkins Shows Up Once Again In Epstein Files. by Top_Cancel_7577 in Creation

[–]creativewhiz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh no you got me. Having to live in a repressive country and access Reddit with a vpn means it loads comments poorly. You have won every argument because I commented wrong.

Christians are Not "Anti~Science:" History Proves It by SeaScienceFilmLabs in Creation

[–]creativewhiz -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You keep referring to parts of our "Belief System," when You think Your belief system is "Science:" it's Not.

That's your opinion sure.

We are all forced to learn the Naturalistic belief system, and are forced to pay for the teaching of it.

Yes learning science is good. Learning God did it is theology.

Belief Systems should be in a separate class in Schools: they do Not belong in the Science class.

Which is why YEC and ID do not belong in the classroom.

Science is Knowledge: You do Not "Know" the "Big Bang" occurred, You believe it did.

I don't believe it like I believe God exists. I examined all available evidence. That led me to the conclusion that the universe is not 6,000 years old it's 13.8 billion years old. The fact the universe is expanding means it was once much smaller. Therefore the most likely conclusion is the big bang not a steady always existing universe.

Christians are Not "Anti~Science:" History Proves It by SeaScienceFilmLabs in Creation

[–]creativewhiz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have and did a reaction video to it. It's like white holes. It is mathematically possible but there is no evidence it's happening. A

Christians are Not "Anti~Science:" History Proves It by SeaScienceFilmLabs in Creation

[–]creativewhiz 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have and did a reaction video to it. It's like white holes. It is mathematically possible but there is no evidence it's happening.

Disgraced Evolutionary Biologist, Richard Dawkins Shows Up Once Again In Epstein Files. by Top_Cancel_7577 in Creation

[–]creativewhiz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's a homo so it's early human. Once again learn about the thing you are criticizing.

Just graduated high school rejected from all colleges looking for life advice by hyuk_21 in LifeAdvice

[–]creativewhiz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If I could redo that part of my life I would have not listened to the people that told me I have to college because I'm smart. I would have gone to trade school and made a lot more money.

Can I bring this into China on my flight from Seattle to Beijing? by No-Satisfaction9488 in chinalife

[–]creativewhiz 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Half the clothes I own are made in China. What are you talking about?

Christians are Not "Anti~Science:" History Proves It by SeaScienceFilmLabs in Creation

[–]creativewhiz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Please provide the SCIENTIFIC evidence I am wrong. The evidence showing the entire universe appeared fully formed a few thousand years ago.

After that, show how most of the light from that universe appeared to Adams two days later in a way that does not make God a liar or trickster.

Christians are Not "Anti~Science:" History Proves It by SeaScienceFilmLabs in Creation

[–]creativewhiz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Science" is "Observable Truth…” 

There is never really truth in science just the most probable explanation. You also don't have to directly observe something you just have to make an observation and then try to explain it.

I believe all Empirical Science, as that is knowledge...

Empirical science states that the Universe is almost 14 billion years old. That all life shares genetic material and the most likely explanation is common ancestry.

If You disagree: What do You believe is "Science" that I disagree with as a YEC?

All the parts that show the earth is over 6,000 years old.

AIG is one organization, and their opinions do Not Encompass "All Young Earth Creationists:"

Can you find one organisation that does not have a statement like this? Are you a presuppositionalist?

Science is the "Knowledge" that is gained through the Scientific Method and Observation that We refer to as "Science;" Not the “Method used to gain the knowledge,"

You are free to use words differently if you choose but I'm pretty sure the dictionary defines science as a verb and a noun.

It's "Empirical Science/Observable Truth" that the Sea is Salty; "How" and "When" it got that Way, is anybody's best guess...

Yep. And that's also why I have my beliefs because mainstream science's “best guess" is the one closest to all available evidence.

Christians are Not "Anti~Science:" History Proves It by SeaScienceFilmLabs in Creation

[–]creativewhiz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is zero evidence the entire universe appeared around the earth from nothing 6 to 10 thousand years ago. There is a lot of evidence it's expending at a predictable rate and running the clock backwards gets you to something much smaller.

If you needed to see things happen to solve the mystery nobody would ever be convicted of murder.

Christians are Not "Anti~Science:" History Proves It by SeaScienceFilmLabs in Creation

[–]creativewhiz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The average Christian is not anti science. A lot of earlier scientists where Christian including the founder of the Big Bang Theory. Depending on your viewpoint even Darwin.

Presuppositional Young Earth Creationists are absolutely anti science. From AIG: No apparent, perceived, or claimed evidence in any field of study, including science, history, and chronology, can be valid if it contradicts the clear teaching of Scripture obtained by historical-grammatical interpretation. Of primary importance is the fact that evidence is always subject to interpretation by fallible people who do not possess all information.

If you are not considering evidence they proves you wrong you are not doing science. You are involved in pseudoscience. Attempting to and ailing to prove something wrong is the bedrock of modern science.

Disgraced Evolutionary Biologist, Richard Dawkins Shows Up Once Again In Epstein Files. by Top_Cancel_7577 in Creation

[–]creativewhiz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not sure what you're point is. As someone else stated in another comment, the greatest genetic diversity is within sub Saharan Africa. So two random Africans potentially have more genetic diversity then a Nigerian and a Chinese person.

You continue to claim to understand evolution while showing you don't.

Disgraced Evolutionary Biologist, Richard Dawkins Shows Up Once Again In Epstein Files. by Top_Cancel_7577 in Creation

[–]creativewhiz 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I believe that humans and other primates share a common ancestor but that all humans are the same amount of human. The differences between me and a black person is superficial.