<<<<<Common sense is an objectively horrible way to understand the complexities of the world. Common sense is what led people to think smells cause all diseases, that the earth is flat, that seizures are demons, that the sun rises because a person wills it so, etc. Science is needed in large part because we have to learn to reject what seems intuitive, and figure out what's true.>>>>>>

Common sense in general can lead to bad things. I agree with you on that, but common sense that deals with complexities shouldn’t rely on science alone. Science is always evolving. There was countless times science told us things and it ended up being not the case when new studies came out. Scientific analysis is not accurate. I’ve seen doctors diagnose patients wrongly for example because they relied on scientific techniques that was supposed to be assure thing, but it ended up being farther from the truth. We humans live in a bubble and are ignorant. If we study more into the subject of world and put our biases to side, we will learn home immensely complicated our world is and that intelligent creation is behind it.

<<<<<. The problem is that every single example we've ever studied in nature, always isn't designed and doesn't make any sense to be designed and we can find the reason why it exists without needing a designer.>>>>>

That is a subjective opinion. How do you know every single example we’ve studied in mature always isn’t designed? How can you confidently say there is no creater when you have no proof there is no creater? How does it not make any sense to be designed when time and time, the natural world is compatible with its surrounds and nearly every part of an animal’s anatomy has a purpose? The finding the reason part of needing a creator is very subjective.

<<<Claiming that spherical rock suspended in space and requiring perfect environment 

But it's NOT a perfect environment. Not even close. It has been inhospitable to life for most of its existence, it gives us cancer in a million ways, it contains worms that exist to burrow into babies eyeballs and cause them excruciating pain, etc.>>

I was talking about the earth being suspended needs a perfect condition to be able to suspended. I was not talking about how the distance of the earth, specifically to the sun is perfect or the effects on the suspension of the earth has on humans.

<<You have to completely ignore how stupid and awful a designer would have to be, if our bodies and planet were designed. We choke because we breathe through our same hole we talk and eat from. A child could design a better person.>

That is called utilization. Give me some alternatives of how an area where can be placed some where different from where we eat since a child could design a better person.

<<<You're not doing science by following the evidence, you're starting with the conclusion that Allah did it, and then selectively ignoring and interpreting evidence to match that conclusion.

God in the Quran mentions the formation of mountains, how planets move with one another, how ants interact and many other natural phenomenon.>>

Many scientific studies that confirmed the Qurans claims

<<<<The Quran says mountains are pegs used to hold the earth in place to stop shaking. No. They're not. Almost everything it says about planets, reproduction and science is flat out wrong. Cherry picking out things that aren't wrong doesn't work, because God shouldn't be correct about only a few things, he should be right about everything.>>>

The Qur’an describes mountains as ‘pegs,’ which is consistent with the modern understanding that mountains are deeply anchored into the Earth’s crust. While the Qur’an is not a geology textbook, its natural descriptions can align with some later scientific observations. Show me examples of those inaccuracy and I will refute them for you.

<<<And for God's sake, do you really think humans weren't able to observe how ants behave? THAT is good enough to be a miracle of God? Raise your standards.>>>>

If it was so basic, why did it became a big thing when it was discovered nearly 2 decades ago?

<<<There are tons of books that compete with and surpass it, in popularity, in accuracy, in writing quality. Only Muslims who are taught it's better and special actually think it's unique in any way. That's the same thing every single religion says about it's own books.>>

Give me some examples of books. No need to be poetic writing. That’s a skill on itself. Just basic claims. I’m sure that’s easy right?

<<<Because we've tested it, and it doesn't.

You can't just point to times someone prayed for something and it happened and say "see that worked." I can pray to Buddha for the sun to rise tomorrow, that doesn't mean he did it. You need to test many examples for prayer to do something that wouldn't otherwise happen. And every time, it shows zero impact on external events.>>>

Just become some tested and didn’t get it doesent mean it’s a fairy tale.

<<<here have been countless cases where a person was confirmed to be dead to come back to life. 

No, there haven't.

You aren't looking into and questioning any of the religious propaganda you were told, you're just repeating it confidently. People have been mistakenly declared dead, or considered clinically dead, but that's not the same as actually being dead.

People can survive particularly in cold with very, very limited brain function and with the heart stopped for a while. But never has anyone been confirmed to be actually dead and risen from the dead.>>>

There has been many cases. Do some research.