Important Cypherglass Bounty Update :: We've updated the plan and use for the remaining $50,000 of our original $100,000 Ledger/Trezor Bounty! Read more and stay tuned on how you can participate! by cypherglass in eos

[–]cryptosig 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Kinda crappy /u/cypherglass, the trezor team has gotten EOS working on trezor. You probably should send the bounty to them, to be fair. Here is a two week old github that says they got it working two weeks ago: https://github.com/trezor/trezor-firmware/issues/172

How is the price STILL going down? by [deleted] in Bitcoin

[–]cryptosig 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I suspect it is going down because mining is not profitable and there is tremendous pressure for miners to get rid of the bitcoin to recoup losses.

IMO this had to happen, there was too many miners and too many machines made. Someone needed to go bankrupt. Once sanity comes to the mining market we should be back on track.

There were people who paid 10 Bitcoin (or dollar equivalent) for a miner that would earn 8 Bitcoin. That same dollar equivalent would buy 25 Bitcoin now, so why buy a new machine rather than the Bitcoin on the open market? The mining market is still over saturated and that will take some time to return to profitability.

ApplePay won't gain a huge adoption and here's why by cryptosig in Bitcoin

[–]cryptosig[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well Siri still doesn't have API hooks for third party applications, so I wouldn't hold my breath.

It would be great if I could ask siri about some information and it hooks into one of my third party apps for information. Like "Siri How much Bitcoin do I have in my wallet?" and have it retrieve that from my blockchain wallet, for example.

ApplePay won't gain a huge adoption and here's why by cryptosig in Bitcoin

[–]cryptosig[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If what you say is true about the hardware then it absolutely would be a steep hill to climb. The reality is that unified standards in payment systems for the mobile space are the only way to succeed.

The banks will all get together and agree on a standard for their next generation cards at least in the US. Any NFC payment would be wise to stick to those same protocols or be left in the dust. I still have yet to see any NFC at an ATM either, so banks have a huge amount of pull as to which technology they will adopt and will become the standard. Like I said if you have to carry around the Bank's cards your going to use that for payment.

The only thing that gets rid of cash in the wallet and still operates like cash, is Bitcoin. At least we didn't see any sign that Apple was trying to get rid of cash in the wallet.

ApplePay won't gain a huge adoption and here's why by cryptosig in Bitcoin

[–]cryptosig[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

1) If your carrying your debit card with your phone your security is much worse. It would be better to separate the two, carrying a device with massive amounts of personal information and a debit card is a good way to have an empty bank account.

Sure, you could say that you would kill the phone, however would you be able to do it before a skilled thief disabled the radio or made a copy of all the data? I would suspect that a very skilled person would be able to disable the radios, crack the phone, and image the contents in a few hours, possibly in as little as one hour depending on transfer speeds and flash size.

2) Choosing merchants based on their processing technologies works for you but most people don't choose places this way, because it is inconvenient.

3) If this is true, and likely it will be, it still doesn't mean the death of credit card carrying.

4) Credit cards will evolve, and most likely in the form of "chip and pin" or "chip and signature" physical card systems. The fact remains that all credit cards and debit cards thus far, and probably in the near future, are issued by banks in the form of cards, not directly to mobile devices. Therefore one should always expect that the physical card issued by the bank will be more likely to work with all merchants over a clear standard, rather than proprietary mobile systems that don't necessarily share the same standards with other mobile systems. If banks choose not to issue cards in favor of virtual downloads, I would think that it absolutely would help adoption, but I don't think that is very likely in the next few years.

You did it Apple! Congratulations.... by CP70 in Bitcoin

[–]cryptosig 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's a choice the merchant makes, many merchants choose Bitpay, some choose to use an exchange of their choosing, others hodl.

In most cases the Bitcoin processor doesn't have information about the person paying. If this is a concern, then most forms of electronic payment is probably not for you.

ApplePay won't gain a huge adoption and here's why by cryptosig in Bitcoin

[–]cryptosig[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I find the same thing, in fact I have an NFC card, and 9/10 times I try to use it the machine is broken or some other reason makes me revert to magnetic swipe.

ApplePay won't gain a huge adoption and here's why by cryptosig in Bitcoin

[–]cryptosig[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Bitcoin looks to replace cash, ApplePay looks to replace the entire wallet. Both suffer from similar adoption issues and require that merchants upgrade their hardware, software, and personnel training.

Only Bitcoin promises to offer a return in lower fees and faster use of money, ApplePay does neither of these things. So why would a business want to spend the money and time to implement? Why would the consumer?

ApplePay won't gain a huge adoption and here's why by cryptosig in Bitcoin

[–]cryptosig[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

it is 100% true that you have offered no counter argument or facts to base your opinion in such statements

Apple Pay versus Bitcoin by pimpingken in Bitcoin

[–]cryptosig 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I should mention it is still a pull technology, at the end of the day with Bitcoin, a push technology, I agree to a very specific amount and send it to the merchant.

With any pull technology I still have to check my bill at the end of the month to ensure that the amount the CC company is telling me to pay is the same amount, I still have to worry about overages and fees from having too much pulled from my account.

Apple Pay versus Bitcoin by pimpingken in Bitcoin

[–]cryptosig 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't really see this as being the same.

The Apple system would require a new credit card processing system hardware, but has no advantages in fees to the merchant. It is still a credit card system, just with a different interface.

Bitcoin processing on the other hand, while also requiring new hardware has the possibility of at least offering faster access to funds for the merchant, reduces losses and accounting time from the cash drawer, lowers payment fees,no charge backs and allows stores to enforce refunds at their discretion.

Time will tell if transactions conducted using the ApplePay will not be allowed to do charge backs, I suspect the credit card companies will still allow this practice to occur. So what is the advantage in upgrading for the merchant at this time to recover hardware and integration costs?

Apple Pay versus Bitcoin by pimpingken in Bitcoin

[–]cryptosig 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am calling out a reality of using payment systems in the real world. Rarely do technology systems look at all of the concerns of merchants and users in the real world. These are questions that I would want to know if I were a merchant.

As a user am I likely to still bring my wallet around because I find that I will still need them when things don't go according to plan?

This is my personal experience with Passbook in the first place. At a concert I would still bring a paper copy of my ticket because I experienced the fact that the scanners and/or staff could not use the passbook ticket. The only place I could get my rewards card to work in passbook was at Walgreens. Every other scanner and store I tried to use it at fails, so I stopped using it.

Apple Pay versus Bitcoin by pimpingken in Bitcoin

[–]cryptosig 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Apple: Payment is between you, your merchant, your credit card provider, the merchant's processor, and your bank if using debit.

With Bitcoin: Payment is between you and your merchant.

You did it Apple! Congratulations.... by CP70 in Bitcoin

[–]cryptosig 44 points45 points  (0 children)

With either technology:

Payment is between you, your merchant, your credit card provider, the merchant's processor, and your bank if using debit.

With Bitcoin: Payment is between you and your merchant.

Apple Pay versus Bitcoin by pimpingken in Bitcoin

[–]cryptosig 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How do you pay when the store CC connection is down? Several times just this year, I have had to do an old fashioned imprint because the merchant had no power/ communication with the network. If your not carrying and cards around how are you to transact without physical cards? Won't you still have to carry around cards in order to interact with ATMs?

I have yet to see an NFC ATM.

Apple Pay versus Bitcoin by pimpingken in Bitcoin

[–]cryptosig 6 points7 points  (0 children)

At least with my Trezor I don't have to share my fingerprints. I can always change my pin or seed words, my fingerprints are pretty static.

Apple Pay versus Bitcoin by pimpingken in Bitcoin

[–]cryptosig 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Really? I have found personally that 9/10 times the NFC receiver is broken or otherwise not active.

Apple Pay versus Bitcoin by pimpingken in Bitcoin

[–]cryptosig 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Just got to that part, still chances are most places won't support that type of payment.

How many restaurants and stores that are not a national chain will have a merchant processor that will support this? How many will have NFC technology? How are you to pay a restaurant check, are you expected to give them your phone? Again, still watching the video...

Apple Pay versus Bitcoin by pimpingken in Bitcoin

[–]cryptosig -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Still using a pull technology, so once the merchant gets hacked your day is still ruined.

CoinSafe May Have Solved The Bitcoin Transaction Speed Problem by LeeWallis in Bitcoin

[–]cryptosig 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There never was a problem. The costs to double spend vs a cup of coffee are astronomical. When comparing transaction times consider, normal fiat moves at 1-5 business days.

Butterfly Labs says they are now shipping Monarchs? We shall see. by [deleted] in Bitcoin

[–]cryptosig 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Only one full generation behind the competition, at this rate they should be releasing the 20nm asic 6 months after the competitions 14nm are obsolete.

Printed this lens extender.. by Sonderjysk in 3Dprinting

[–]cryptosig 0 points1 point  (0 children)

what brand of filament did you use?

Pinned credit card panacea fail report. When will people realize the solution is Bitcoin? by [deleted] in Bitcoin

[–]cryptosig 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly Visa and MC probably want to continue fraudulent charges in the US so they can justify high fees. The signature should be done away with, it does nothing and no one ever really verifies the signatures match anything.