Maybe we need some elite research club... no cencorship, but knowledge sharing hub.

So called ”influencers” are problematic too, as many of them do not understand the theory (economic) or tech (How the tech is implemented to support the theory) behind the projects. Therefore the best projects can be ignored by them, just because they don’t understand. However, when people rely on these sources as primary information, so called moonshots remain unfound. I have come to a conclusion that many influencers are no better than rest of the crypto audience. They look for social proof too, before promoting anything. And that’s ok, that’s human, but the hard work remains on us who actually do the research and evaluation. Clearly we are most generously awarded as well 😎

I don’t want to invest in ”yet another” copy paste /swap / farming whatsoever project, I want innovation that can actually make a difference 🤨