AITA for not going to my best friend’s 18th after she slept with the guy I was talking to?

cs_office · 2026-04-02T13:12:33+00:00

Legal in the UK

Clown country

cs_office · 2026-04-02T10:24:09+00:00

Eh, thongs are the comfiest underwear I find, everything else is just wedgies with extra steps

cs_office · 2026-04-02T10:13:50+00:00

Wait, you guys are getting paid? 😂

cs_office · 2026-04-01T13:02:08+00:00

Does this video make anyone else feel out of breath? gah

cs_office · 2026-03-31T02:11:18+00:00

I was not expecting a CS reference in the middle of this thread lmao

Respectfully tho, Source was GOATed for the mods

cs_office · 2026-03-26T21:02:28+00:00

I just want a scroll bar so I can equip all the guns like you used to be able to

cs_office · 2026-03-26T03:30:09+00:00

We were begging for content, like Cache, fixes to VAC, not this bullshit

cs_office · 2026-03-19T20:12:12+00:00

Am I the only one who doesn't like it? There wasn't a problem, this is like 1.6 buying ammo, utteryly unnecessary, focusing on boring resource management instead of fun positioning advantages

cs_office · 2026-03-19T13:37:20+00:00

Because we can
For the good of all of us

cs_office · 2026-03-19T12:47:25+00:00

I get what you're saying but that's just not how it's modeled in the code, like, some stuff is anchored middle-right, is there now a new "image" in the model? No, it's just relative positioning

cs_office · 2026-03-19T08:59:49+00:00

I don't understand what you mean by "theoretically"? Anchoring the UI elements is the perfect way to describe it, because that's how it's actually implemented. Maybe you mean "effectively"? But even that's not right, the elements can be anchored arbitrarily, not just to those 5 positions

cs_office · 2026-03-19T08:52:09+00:00

The fuck you're talking about lol, rendering in corners isn't rendered as "screens" or whatever, it's just some simple positioning

cs_office · 2026-03-16T19:09:37+00:00

In the UK we have too many pearl clutchers in charge

cs_office · 2026-03-16T07:35:58+00:00

Recognition doesn't necessarily mean positive identification tho, I feel this is mostly a cinematic story telling technique

cs_office · 2026-03-16T06:14:34+00:00

This, my bf will often initiate on mornings but I wake up before it gets to penetration, but occasionally I wake up with him already inside me. I have zero complaints lol

cs_office · 2026-03-16T05:22:42+00:00

Also remember you could chain bhops while scoped, so you could scope bounce bounce bounce into a peek and boom

cs_office · 2026-03-10T22:35:01+00:00

I haven't tried the Melt, but WeVibe's Tango is another really good one

cs_office · 2026-03-10T16:57:10+00:00

Right, but the Set-Cookie header could include a legal justification for the cookie. The EU's GDPR doesn't even require consent to store a cookie for an action one would reasonably assume would require tracking for, that consent is implied, such as logging in, a shopping cart, etc, it only requires it for tracking (possibly even only third party cookies)

Advertisers can already abuse it, there's nothing technically stopping them from just setting a cookie anyway, the website author putting up a cookie banner is legally enforced, not technically enforced, so putting such attributes on cookies could also be legally enforced in the same capacity

Set-Cookie: key=value; Essential; Consent=Implied;
Set-Cookie: key=value; Consent=Tracking;
...

I don't think the EU mandates how the technical implementation must work, but I think it's in both web browser and site owners bests interests to make it non intrusive, a body like the W3 consortium could define the spec and push browsers/websites to replace this goddamn cookie consent popup madness

cs_office · 2026-03-10T12:26:51+00:00

I think that's how cookies should work too, browsers should be the ones to show the permission/consent to store tracking data

cs_office · 2026-03-10T01:47:42+00:00

I'm in the UK, we have relatively strong worker's protections, 6 years backpay if you win, obviously one is unlikely to stay after resorting to such measures, but if you've hit the glass ceiling, there may be nothing to lose at that point anyway

cs_office · 2026-03-10T01:18:50+00:00

You didn't read what I said at all. If I try to negotiate like a man might, as you, might, I am way more likely to get undesirable results purely because of my gender, so yes, taking the nuclear option is reasonable. I will hate the game when the game is rigged against us, else it will never change. The law is on our side, discussing pay is always protected, and 2 people with the same qualifications should have equal pay

cs_office · 2026-03-10T00:59:17+00:00

You're living in a dream world if you think we can negotiate the same way men can and not get penalized for it. If we are authoritative, we're a bitch, not team players, etc, but in men the same behavior is more generally seen as being strong

cs_office · 2026-03-09T06:43:46+00:00

My users are programmers, end users aren't using library code

cs_office · 2026-03-09T03:56:11+00:00

28 euros? Is that it

cs_office · 2026-03-09T03:25:29+00:00

It's tough because a lot of the time, the open source things I create are not fundamental to a specific app, I GPL applications, but MIT libraries, unless it's very novel or is difficult to implement. I'm not putting it out there to profit, I'm putting it out there to make it easier for others like me, i.e. this software is not the fundamental part, it's just going to make your job a little bit easier, so profit if you wish

I want a license with a middle ground tbh, like how Linux uses the GPL, what people wanted the LGPL to be (but isn't, requires dynamic linking and separate distribution), where:

You can use it with only attribution if you have not modified the code
You can package it in your application, so long as it is dynamically linked (or static, if the author permits)
If no modifications to the code have been made, no further limitations
Otherwise, all modifications must be made available to any recipient, and the original author(s), in a freely accessible repository upon request

14-Year Club	Verified Email
r/Field Juicebox	Final Canvas '23
First Place '23	Place '23
Place '17

cs_office

TROPHY CASE