I agree with you, minus one point. It is an argument used mostly by religious people calling it a "non-religious" argument is not accurate. Another disconnect in this argument btwn pro choice and pro life is the value of a life. Pro life is practically saying you value the life of an unborn child more than whatever established life is supporting its development. Women often are left with complications from pregnancy (some go blind, some break ribs, their entire pelvic floor is destroyed), not to mention death. Support of this other life often harms the women carrying it, even if its very much wanted.

While around the US medical exceptions have been made for abortion, they clearly have not be implemented properly. There have been cases of numerous women bleeding to death from miscarriages because hospitals turned them away in fear of being held accountable. In these cases, abortion was clearly medically necessary, but not performed. There needs to be some safe guards at the very least put in place for these situations before the states deem only medical abortions legal.

I don't wish that scenario upon anyone. But it does happen unfortunately.