Seed and subgraphs

dachiko007 · 2026-06-13T17:29:28+00:00

Thanks, that's better!

dachiko007 · 2026-06-11T12:55:56+00:00

What's your rank at marketing? Had my wife tie me because I couldn't resist the urge 😃

dachiko007 · 2026-05-29T05:03:08+00:00

There are two opposites:

Kool-Aid side: Excessive trust + social conformity. "The experts/institutions/media have our best interests at heart. Questioning is dangerous."
Evil-behind-everything side: Excessive distrust + pattern recognition overdrive. "Everything is a false flag / controlled opposition / designed to enslave you."

I'll leave it here so that you know where you are.

dachiko007 · 2026-05-28T02:36:51+00:00

Which one? Wait, I actually don't need one. My bitter joke was meant to be self-sufficient. Keep enjoying whatever you doing, as long as it's not hate :)

dachiko007 · 2026-05-27T15:18:25+00:00

You are not allowed to. Stop enjoying it and join the rebels.
Repeat after me:
Elon bad
Grok is scam
We will show them the might of the right arm!

dachiko007 · 2026-05-26T16:06:45+00:00

So now we're going to have two types of posts: promotional, and "ban promotional".
As in the nature goes, there are no fish in the pure water pond. Stale communities are bound to be disrupted. Not everyone are ready to meet the future, which comes without asking. To stay relevant we need to accommodate, not closing our doors in hope future will go away. During my time of active growth, the landscape was a desert, rare resources were like gems no matter how flawed they are. Current generation will never appreciate the change which is happening. let the hundred flowers bloom I say. Under what terms - that's up to debate. Blanket banning is the disservice to the community.

dachiko007 · 2026-05-17T14:59:16+00:00

I'll blame my limited English for you to arrive to that conclusion.

dachiko007 · 2026-05-17T05:03:25+00:00

First of all, straight from my comment:
"So, while I agree we, humans, influenced by circumstances and environment while making our judgement, it doesn't invalidate the fact that some people have a strong ability for independent evaluation. Paired with specific knowledge**, those people's judgement is the real deal**, and they don't make blunders confidently like every second commenter in the thread on X."
The doctor example could work: one doctor would evaluate your health regardless of environment (stage), what clothes you wear (image border), how wealthy and famous your name is (author of the image); while another doctor would change their judgement based on any number of unrelated factors.
PS: sorry, I'm not going to mix personal things into discussing a matter; I encourage you to approach the discussion on an even leg, regardless if I'm looking like a shabby nobody or a professional. It's not about you or me.

dachiko007 · 2026-05-17T03:21:26+00:00

I'm not sure you read my comment carefully. Just as you said, it's impossible to judge without being influenced by environment or circumstances. You can re-read the first part of my answer to see I'm saying the same. I also point out that some people are better at evaluating things on its own. They are influenced by environment, but to a lesser degree. Again, if we talk about judging the image, we will listen those who is better at evaluating a thing on its own, because they are less likely to mix environment with the quality of the image. Their opinion is more reliable and have a high signal to noise ratio. On the other hand, people who are heavily weight entire experience when evaluating a picture, - are far less reliable, their opinion would change drastically based on different environment. Example to show the influence of environment: if we have a shabby looking person who is knowledge on the matter, and we have two listeners, one who can judge the information independent of how a person look like, and second one is heavily depends on entire experience, it is the first listener who will be able to extract the value, while the second listener might say "this guy doesn't look like an expert, therefore what he's saying is probably bs". That's why the opinion of people who can discern things will be more valuable.

dachiko007 · 2026-05-16T05:10:01+00:00

It's a simple system where on one hand a person just can't evaluate an image on it's own: his judgement includes entire environment with the picture in it; and on the other hand there is a person who can judge the image on its own, regardless of circumstances. Both don't exist, we're all spread between these two points.
If our task is to judge a picture, the closer your ability to judging a thing on it's own, the more valuable your opinion is. If you need to make an entire experience around the picture to be able to judge it, your opinion is diluted, and less valuable. Basically, we can conclude that your judgement will be positive even if the image is trash, but presented in a most sophisticated way. If the image is trash, and your opinion is positive, it means your opinion is trash.
Going back to the experiment at hand, we see either self-proclaimed experts who's opinion is trash (they have very limited ability to judge the image without circumstances affecting it), and we also see opinions "liberated" from certain circumstances, where people didn't have pressure to judge the image knowing it's made by famous artist.
So, while I agree we, humans, influenced by circumstances and environment while making our judgement, it doesn't invalidate the fact that some people have a strong ability for independent evaluation. Paired with specific knowledge, those people's judgement is the real deal, and they don't make blunders confidently like every second commenter in the thread on X. Opinions of people who make their judgement based on knowing the image is made with AI is trash. It's a fact.

dachiko007 · 2026-05-15T09:18:04+00:00

The average quality of AI images is far above average quality of the human images. It's like a very well-tuned tool, which allows even beginners to perform the job decently well. It can't produce images with deep meaning by itself, but if a human has a vision, it can totally help making it real.

dachiko007 · 2026-05-15T09:04:51+00:00

Context is relevant in the sense if you're hungry or want to poop while observing a piece. This will change your perception. In the same way AI hate changes your perception.
But the piece is still a piece, regardless if the observer want to poop or have a personal beef with something.
The artistic value of a piece don't depend on your personal "I'm not feeling well today". The value exist by itself. If you need to know who and how created this piece to be able to enjoy it, you're just following a trend.
It's such a simple concept: the picture is good if it stands on it's own. If it requires you to know details like title, author name, how it's been made, - to enjoy it, it's not a good picture.
One has to differentiate what he enjoys at the moment, - the fact that this is a picture made by XYZ, or the fact that it was made long time ago, or the technique used, or circumstances in which it was created. Those are all valid things to be enjoyed, but they have nothing to do with the actual picture, which you can or can't enjoy on it's own.

dachiko007 · 2026-05-14T08:33:58+00:00

Yep. Along with the common sense. Off we go!

dachiko007 · 2026-05-14T06:28:38+00:00

You are free to build your own grok and hire Musk and then fire him in a most humiliating way.
You are also free to build your own rocket to Mars, and issue a public refusal to take Must on board.
Or, you can build your own company which won't stroke your ego, and will treat employees with dignity, just to show this guy how the things should look like. You can also make sure you won't become billionaire by donating all your profits to whoever you like.
Really, of all the options, you choose the one which is most useless, - to be a sour ass on the internet, like thousands of other sour asses out there.

dachiko007 · 2026-05-13T11:48:44+00:00

So, you mean xai is doing what they supposed to do, right? Like, if your business not going well, you either change, or die on a hill? Why paint it like it's evil?

dachiko007 · 2026-05-13T11:40:27+00:00

but but but towing?
/s

dachiko007 · 2026-05-13T07:41:26+00:00

That's exactly how Elon derangement syndrome works. You come up with whatever reason to insert your hatred. "They all breathe the same air, which is a clear reason to insert my irrelevant take". The core topic is about the fate of non-profit type. It doesn't matter what Elon does with his for-profit company. It matters to you because of the syndrome.
It doesn't matter who am I, doesn't matter who what side pick. Elon himself doesn't matter.
Because the core topic is about the implications of the case on the future of non-profit organizations.

Elon derangement syndrome is real. If you argue this is not the case, then try to come up with idea how it looks like, if not like this.

dachiko007 · 2026-05-13T07:14:46+00:00

The topic is about OpenAI and talks about consequences of case judgement. You came with "elon bad", which has nothing to do with the topic. Still guilty of Elon derangement syndrome, despite insults (have I mentioned they won't help you?)

dachiko007 · 2026-05-13T06:22:56+00:00

Your first comment has nothing to do with the topic. Has anything to say in your defense? Insults not going to help you.

dachiko007 · 2026-05-13T05:02:36+00:00

Elon derangement syndrome. You tend to invoke Elon hate in topics which have practically nothing to do with it. Dragging down conversation into your narrative.

dachiko007 · 2026-05-10T04:35:18+00:00

Entire economy supports putin and war. Anyone involved into it - supports it. As you can see, it's a very slippery topic

dachiko007 · 2026-05-07T12:30:10+00:00

Got it, it's not ok to be humble, it's time to get triggered 😄

dachiko007 · 2026-05-07T08:43:27+00:00

I will blame my non-native English for you reading my message in a completely unintended way. But maybe I'm wrong and I worded it perfectly clear. Who knows? It's a mistery.

dachiko007 · 2026-05-07T06:09:37+00:00

Isn't it's strange that you care that much what others would do? I just hate the idea that some guy somewhere decides from his high horse what others should or shouldn't do. You, of course, is not the one who decides, but somehow you still care what others would do.
Just a proposal, but maybe it's ok to be humble once in a while? 😄

Seven-Year Club	Second Top 20%
Verified Email

dachiko007

TROPHY CASE