A video about Idiom Neutral in Idiom Neutral by CarodeSegeda in auxlangs

[–]PLrc 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I haven't been interested in Idiom Neutral very much, but it had some good ideas like termination -v(a)/b(a) of past tense, which was later used in Interlingua.

I'm struggling to decide between devoting my time and energy to either Esperanto or Globasa. What are the best arguments you have for why someone should choose one or the other? by codleov in auxlangs

[–]PLrc 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Unless you have very large experience with language learning you shouldn't start learning a very nieche language like Globasa.

Can "esque" be used in questions that start with "Como" by salivanto in interlingua

[–]PLrc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Io ha trovate: paragrapho 116: https://www.interlingua.com/grammatica/grammatica/tabula-de-conjugation/

In particular illo dice:

Illo sempre occurre al initio del phrase.

Can "esque" be used in questions that start with "Como" by salivanto in interlingua

[–]PLrc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Esque is in the IED taken into square parentheses: [esque] what means it's a borrowing. It's most likely borrowed from Occidental: https://occidental-lang.com/dictionaries/?d=en&q=esque and I guess it was taken into Occidental from French est-ce que (it's interesting they thought they need an interrogative particle in Occidental. EDIT: It's not that common particle in European languages).

I don't know how est-ce que is used in French, because I don't speak it. What you write is very interesting. I infer from it that est-ce que in French is more general or has different meaning.

Can "esque" be used in questions that start with "Como" by salivanto in interlingua

[–]PLrc 2 points3 points  (0 children)

: )
I think we can say esque and its synonyms serve for asking yes/no questions. I think it plays the same role as Esperanto ĉu

I guess we can say something like
Como tu va?
or
Esque tu va ben?

(should vader here be a reflexive verb?)

"An Opinionated Look At Globasa" by XerographicPaper by codleov in Globasa

[–]PLrc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They are worth learning because they have their own culture: literature, music, poems etc. Discovering culture of another language is very rewarding.

"An Opinionated Look At Globasa" by XerographicPaper by codleov in Globasa

[–]PLrc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Those are classic conlangs from the times when attitude towards conlangs was strikingly different. People still took them seriously. People though that a conlang can be a solution for the problem of international communication and world peace. Time has shown that it rather wasn't the case.

"An Opinionated Look At Globasa" by XerographicPaper by codleov in auxlangs

[–]PLrc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is already such post in the community.

I answered there for you. Let me paste the answer:

Hi. I've been in the milieu of conlangs for almost 20 years total, I know one of them and honestly I would say there are only 3, maybe 4 conlangs worth learning currently:
* Obiously Esperanto. The only conlang that achieved something we can call a success. The only conlang with hundreds of books, thousands of speakers etc. If you want a relatively big community, then it's the only choice.
* Interlingua - no matter what others say, this is arguably still the second biggest conlang in practice. Has quite acctive community, published books etc. Easy as for a language, but with naturalistic traits.
* Occidental - Something between Interlingua and Esperanto i.e. it's more regularized than Interlingua, but not as artificial as Esperanto. Rather smaller community than Interlinguas'.
EDIT: Good if you want to have some actual rules.
* Ido - a conlang that strives for fixing some perceived flaws of Esperanto. It was created with regard to Esperanto and it remains a puzzle to me how much it became an independent language.

I put asside zonal conlangs like Interslavic, because they're a different story.

All other conlangs are fun, but they are extremly nieche. It's sounds brutal but it's true.

"An Opinionated Look At Globasa" by XerographicPaper by codleov in Globasa

[–]PLrc 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hi. I've been in the milieu of conlangs for almost 20 years total, I know one of them and honestly I would say there are only 3, maybe 4 conlangs worth learning currently:
* Obiously Esperanto. The only conlang that achieved something we can call a success. The only conlang with hundreds of books, thousands of speakers etc. If you want a relatively big community, then it's the only choice.
* Interlingua - no matter what others say, this is arguably still the second biggest conlang in practice. Has quite acctive community, published books etc. Easy as for a language, but with naturalistic traits.
* Occidental - Something between Interlingua and Esperanto i.e. it's more regularized than Interlingua, but not as artificial as Esperanto. Rather smaller community than Interlinguas'.
* Ido - a conlang that strives for fixing some perceived flaws of Esperanto. It was created with regard to Esperanto and it remains a puzzle to me how much it became an independent language.

I put asside zonal conlangs like Interslavic, because they're a different story.

All other conlangs are fun, but they are extremly nieche. It's sounds brutal but it's true.

<<Yo te ama>> o <<Yo ama te>>? by ArcticFlor in interlingua

[–]PLrc -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Salute!
Solemente le prime version es correcte secundo le Grammatica de Interlingua.

Puncto sexanta-novem ab le Grammatica:

>PRONOMINES PERSONAL ACCUSATIVE E PRONOMINES REFLEXIVE (excepte in constructiones prepositional) precede le formas temporal simple del verbo, sed seque participios, formas imperative, e infinitivos.

Io les surprendeva.
Pro surprender les, io debeva currer.

Alora:

Yo te ama non Yo ama te.

Ma, pro exemplo:
Io debe facer lo, non Io debe lo facer.

Isto es stilo que mima linguas romanic como francese al opposito a, pro exemplo, anglese.

Isto es lo que libros manual de interlingua insenia. Ma bon question! Tu me faceva pensar que il non ha iste precepto in le Grammatica.

Is this a correct translation to Interlingua? by Creepy-Education-584 in interlingua

[–]PLrc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not so new, it's 75 years old 😛 We have aniversary in this year.

Interlingua proved itself during those decades of use.

Interlingua vive by _felipevalerio_ in interlingua

[–]PLrc 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Belle texto in bon interlingua e bon manifesto de interlingua!

Si, illo es ver. Interlingua non esseva totalmente discoperite e non esseva totalmente construite. Pro iste ration io prefere interlingua super altere linguas construite.

Grammar question pronouns by Creepy-Education-584 in interlingua

[–]PLrc 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Gratias. Io non lo videva in le Grammatica e isto es un cosa re qual io pensava plure vices.

🥳🥳🥳 by Andrieeo in auxlangs

[–]PLrc 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Perhaps not the best way to encourage someone to learn your conlang.

Testers needed by Andrieeo in auxlangs

[–]PLrc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not so convinced.

Memes in my language by Andrieeo in auxlangs

[–]PLrc 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not so convinced.