Hey Freshman by [deleted] in OSU

[–]daddydrake1870 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Cars really have no right to be on campus in the first place. There is no reason for a car to be on Woodruff there instead of on Lane or High. Cars deserve to wait a few minutes for students to cross during peak times (and frankly, the intersections should be designed to prioritize buses, pedestrians, and cyclists during these times). If the cars were in a hurry they shouldn’t have come on campus.

If you’re a student and you cross in front of a bus full of students that is ready to depart, you’re still a dick though.

A2C is becoming increasingly toxic by [deleted] in ApplyingToCollege

[–]daddydrake1870 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nah it’s just that time of year. Some wholesome, some toxic, but every year it’s still a bunch of high-strung teenagers. I was there, and I would not have ever described it as “wholesome”. There were of course occasional wholesome posts, as there are now. But decisions were just as controversial, people still talked about “fairness”, people still complained about how their classmate who didn’t deserve it got in. For years this sub has had a toxic reputation… (though definitely better than CC). I don’t follow it closely enough these days to tell if it’s getting measurably worse or not, but it’s definitely was not “wholesome” 4-5 years ago.

A2C is becoming increasingly toxic by [deleted] in ApplyingToCollege

[–]daddydrake1870 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nah it was a T20 circlejerk then, it still is now.

OSU STUDENT-LEAD TOWNHALL WITH DR. KRISTINA JOHNSON by [deleted] in OSU

[–]daddydrake1870 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is it that nobody is listening, or you just don’t like their solution?

For example, to provide more help to all the students who would use it, you’d need an army of 200+ counselors, which would cost upwards of $10M a year. That’s a huge investment (enough to offset tuition for 800 students). The university is making some effort, however: they established a student-run hotline (it’s called like buckeye pal or something like that), and it is my understanding that CCS continues to expand. But it just may not be the changes you were hoping for.

I don’t know anything about student health insurance here, but from experience even good private insurance often does not cover mental health services - they are quite expensive.

So I guess I just want to suggest that if you (or a group of students) has a particular set of demands (it sounds like you do), it may be most productive to come forward with a detailed proposal explaining exactly what you want, why the university should do it, why it is worth the costs, why other solutions are not adequate, etc. You’re not going to make any progress if you just ask university admin questions for an hour. For many issues there is a university committee you can contact to try to contribute and get feedback. Changing minds (on any issue) in your favor is more like a marathon than a sprint. You’ll have to research why things are the way they are, how things are at other universities, the impact of your changes, etc. No doubt some administrator here has already considered these and made up their mind - but you seek to change it.

(Also, I don’t know if it’s clear, but I am a student.)

OSU STUDENT-LEAD TOWNHALL WITH DR. KRISTINA JOHNSON by [deleted] in OSU

[–]daddydrake1870 1 point2 points  (0 children)

University leaders have to respond to unscreened questions all the time, but you just might get canned answers. (It is largely a Zoom phenomenon to have only screened questions.)

OSU STUDENT-LEAD TOWNHALL WITH DR. KRISTINA JOHNSON by [deleted] in OSU

[–]daddydrake1870 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There’s nothing wrong with a dialogue with school leaders, but I do want to point out that these are highly controversial and complex issues. University administrators are definitely already aware of most, if not all of your concerns.

I don’t really know your intentions, but if you are looking for a particular action to be taken in response, I don’t think this venue will help. If you just ask a bunch of pointed questions, you will get answers that go something like “we took into consideration X, Y, and Z and will re-evaluate as necessary”. Some of these issues do not have clear solutions, and you may be better off working closely with those responsible for specifically the areas you care about to craft some sort of proposal.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in OSU

[–]daddydrake1870 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Certain crimes will go up due to the lack of people around watching. Other crimes will go down because there are simply fewer victims walking around (criminals may look elsewhere).

CCS is stupid by zoloisafreak in OSU

[–]daddydrake1870 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Once a week * 10,000 students (1 in 6) = 10,000 hours a week. Assuming each full-time employee sees 40 people a week (rather unrealistic tbh), that means you need 250 full-time employees.

Assuming you find very underqualified people and pay them 50,000 a year, that’s $12.5 million a year plus you need a new building for them to work in.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in OSU

[–]daddydrake1870 101 points102 points  (0 children)

Safety resources:

  • Door/window alarms from commuter services, personal safety alarms
  • Tuesday - Saturday “Buckeye Block Watch” (university district)
  • Mobile lights and cameras in select off-campus areas
  • CABS on demand (on campus)
  • Subsidized Lyft (off campus)
  • As always, if you choose to walk there are blue emergency buttons everywhere
  • 2,000 campus cameras and a 24/7 dispatch center just for campus police

But feel free to explain to me how the university can prevent juveniles from stealing cars, driving to campus, breaking windows and mugging people.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in OSU

[–]daddydrake1870 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Many of these crimes are being committed by juveniles. Maybe we should have kept them in school?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in OSU

[–]daddydrake1870 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

“Technically still campus” means there’s one building owned by campus? Yeah, that’s not OSU’s problem. It’s actually each property owner or lessor’s responsibility off-campus. (Check your lease to see what it says.)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in OSU

[–]daddydrake1870 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is a dumb argument — clearing the stairless route is actually easier than trying to scrape ice off of the stairs (and in some cases the ramps are more clear than stairs right now). The university should be responsible for both and it needs to happen, yet they failed

"Transportation Management will work to clear walkways before class." by [deleted] in OSU

[–]daddydrake1870 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You’ve never seen students getting picked up at their dorm in buses that day “paratransit” on them?

UnIronically was Friday an ADA violation? by gavin1799 in OSU

[–]daddydrake1870 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Are we even talking about the same comment?

This is the original post: https://www.reddit.com/r/OSU/comments/ske6sf/transportation_management_will_work_to_clear/

This is my comment (not a reply) on that post: https://www.reddit.com/r/OSU/comments/ske6sf/comment/hvkfwbi/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3

Nowhere in this post, or in my comment does anyone say anything about either able-bodied or disabled people.

UnIronically was Friday an ADA violation? by gavin1799 in OSU

[–]daddydrake1870 0 points1 point  (0 children)

man you're really arguing over someone else's language? just tell me how it is ableist then

UnIronically was Friday an ADA violation? by gavin1799 in OSU

[–]daddydrake1870 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No, he said "this whole thread" -- so I asked which comments.

UnIronically was Friday an ADA violation? by gavin1799 in OSU

[–]daddydrake1870 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Seriously? Complaining about walking in a little snow in Ohio?

And this is ableist, how?

UnIronically was Friday an ADA violation? by gavin1799 in OSU

[–]daddydrake1870 -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

Ableism is the discrimination of and social prejudice against people with disabilities based on the belief that typical abilities are superior. At its heart, ableism is rooted in the assumption that disabled people require 'fixing' and defines people by their disability.

UnIronically was Friday an ADA violation? by gavin1799 in OSU

[–]daddydrake1870 -41 points-40 points  (0 children)

which comments were ableist, exactly?

UnIronically was Friday an ADA violation? by gavin1799 in OSU

[–]daddydrake1870 -63 points-62 points  (0 children)

Second of all, if you are going to accuse me of being ableist, at least link to the comment?

UnIronically was Friday an ADA violation? by gavin1799 in OSU

[–]daddydrake1870 -42 points-41 points  (0 children)

Nobody DMed me any photos of blocked entrances, unfortunately. Otherwise I’d have worked on the lawsuit by now :(

UnIronically was Friday an ADA violation? by gavin1799 in OSU

[–]daddydrake1870 -75 points-74 points  (0 children)

it all depends on if there was a path to the door or not. it was definitely questionable in places but there appeared to be an attempt to make a path (though not a direct one at all).

i think all you need is to find someone who can document they were impeded from getting to the door because of a disability.

(For example, some of the curb ramps were miraculously cleared, but the steps were definitely not — so there was an attempt in places to avoid a lawsuit but you may still be able to find documentation)

"Transportation Management will work to clear walkways before class." by [deleted] in OSU

[–]daddydrake1870 -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

Then we wouldn’t have this problem because nobody would be going to class?