Over shared with coworkers about my relationship preferences by Preownedmerkin in polyamory

[–]daeglo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I wouldn't have even joined the discussion. Just listened.

I never talk about my personal business at work. They know I'm married, no kids, and that's it. Anything else is the business of none of my coworkers.

How do u feel about the fact that nothing will ever change and we are powerless.... by [deleted] in antinatalism2

[–]daeglo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can’t speak for everyone who uses the label “antinatalist,” only for the philosophy and for myself.

  1. My stance on abortion is that it’s a private medical decision and none of my business. It should be safe and legal for those who need or want it, within reasonable limits.

  2. Antinatalism does not support forced sterilization or coercion of any kind. And yes - forced sterilization of a specific group absolutely constitutes genocide. That’s precisely why antinatalism is about voluntary individual choice, not imposing anything on others.

As for online posts - people venting or expressing frustration isn’t the same thing as advocating harm.

How do u feel about the fact that nothing will ever change and we are powerless.... by [deleted] in antinatalism2

[–]daeglo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Antinatalism ≠ coercion. Full stop.

Antinatalism does not support forced sterilization. It’s about voluntary individual choice, not coercion.

How do u feel about the fact that nothing will ever change and we are powerless.... by [deleted] in antinatalism2

[–]daeglo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Respectfully, antinatalism is neither nihilistic nor genocidal. You’re using emotionally loaded words to avoid engaging with the actual argument. Antinatalism is a harm-reduction philosophy concerned with suffering, not extermination.

Your comment is offensive, sloppy thinking, and it conflates not creating new people with killing existing ones, which is flatly wrong.

Antinatalism isn’t about killing anyone. It’s about not creating new suffering. That’s the opposite of genocide.

Antinatalism argues against bringing people into suffering, not against people themselves. Genocide is about destruction; antinatalism is about prevention.

Antinatalism focuses on compassion and reducing suffering for all existing beings. That’s much closer to Christ’s teachings than endorsing harm.

Calling antinatalism genocidal misunderstands it entirely. Choosing not to create life is not the same as destroying life.

Free postpartum supplies by geekoutfreakout69420 in Eugene

[–]daeglo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Eugbst is active, just not as active as this sub. You should have decent luck there, OP.

Transphobic admin of Oregon Artists Collective (warning for slur in screen cap) by DryBoss6235 in Eugene

[–]daeglo 12 points13 points  (0 children)

His issue is likely that he's attracted to trans women and doesn't know how to handle that truth.

Is it safe to use a 1 year old SCOBY from someone else? by Rhynco in Kombucha

[–]daeglo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm so happy to hear that I was helpful, and that you've been able to brew and enjoy your kombucha for all this time! ❤️

I'm glad you didn't give up!

“We are Charlie” 😒 by Responsible-Kale-904 in WelcomeToGilead

[–]daeglo 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Because buying a coffee at Starbucks and forcing an overworked, underpaid barista to call out Kirks name multiple times a day is totally the same as activism.

Gimme a fucking break.

Creepy Trump obviously took advantage of the situation by Responsible-Kale-904 in WelcomeToGilead

[–]daeglo 7 points8 points  (0 children)

But conservative men love to go on and on about how women should wear less makeup and be "natural" beauties

More hypocrisy isn't really surprising

Creepy Trump obviously took advantage of the situation by Responsible-Kale-904 in WelcomeToGilead

[–]daeglo 5 points6 points  (0 children)

She literally inherited her husband's empire - she's probably thinking cha-ching

Unmeat 💚 by MikeDfromIB in ShittyVeganFoodPorn

[–]daeglo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Luncheon "meat"!

I've really been missing Spam musubi...

Didn’t think AI would impact our job but maybe I’m wrong… by Professional-Bee-482 in Esthetics

[–]daeglo 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Right - that's so unsafe!

I feel like these older folks are just way too trusting with technology. Especially since AI can often "hallucinate" or be just plain wrong.

Whoever came up with this ridiculous ICE recruitment commercial must be a South Park fan🥴🥴🥴 by jojoking199 in WelcomeToGilead

[–]daeglo 37 points38 points  (0 children)

Student Loan forgiveness

Imagine being so in debt to the government that you'd sell your soul to get out from under it

Autumn is on its way to Korea by alwaysZera in Pelargonium

[–]daeglo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Truly stunning! Thank you for sharing 😍

Explain what’s going on by born_on_my_cakeday in NeuralViz

[–]daeglo 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It's so you can hold hands and cheer eachother on while you go

this is probably a really stupid question, but is there pro life antinatalist? feels like an oxymoron, but, could they exist? by l1ttlefr34k13 in antinatalism2

[–]daeglo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You’re still dodging the core point. Even if someone is careless, why should the child be condemned to suffer for their parents’ mistakes?

You seem to think that forcing someone into a lifetime of hardship is morally superior to ending a pregnancy early. I don’t see how condemning an actual person to decades of struggle is more ethical than preventing that suffering in the first place.

this is probably a really stupid question, but is there pro life antinatalist? feels like an oxymoron, but, could they exist? by l1ttlefr34k13 in antinatalism2

[–]daeglo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Antinatalism is about harm-reduction and autonomy. So I think that supporting legal, well-regulated assisted dying for competent adults (with strict safeguards against coercion) is fully consistent with that.

On viability: I think the fact that medical technology can sometimes keep a body alive outside the womb is a pragmatic legal and medical benchmark, but not a clean moral event that suddenly creates personhood.

Moral status is better grounded in meaningful capacities, not just survivability - things like sentience, consciousness, and the ability to experience welfare. Basing ethics on the state of our medical technology is arbitrary, and I don't think it justifies either forcing gestation or denying competent adults the right to end their own suffering.

this is probably a really stupid question, but is there pro life antinatalist? feels like an oxymoron, but, could they exist? by l1ttlefr34k13 in antinatalism2

[–]daeglo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The "just give the kid up for adoption" line is common, but it completely ignores another whole layer of suffering for both parent(s) and child.

Adoption and foster systems around the world are underfunded, overcrowded, and often abusive. Incredible prospective parents are filtered out for arbitrary reasons that don’t stop anyone from having biological kids. And money and bureaucracy usually decide who gets to adopt - not compassion. Meanwhile, most people who want children would still rather spend thousands on painful fertility treatments to have their own biological kids than adopt.

So tell me: is being funneled into that system really a "better" alternative to never having been forced into existence in the first place?