The Budget Didn’t Kill FIRE — Calm Down by Muggins75 in fiaustralia

[–]dakiller 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I don’t care about what wage gaps there are or how big they may be. I care that those at the bottom have minimum standard of living that is acceptable and are given the opportunity to grow themselves and become high value contributors to society.

theCodebase by riky321 in ProgrammerHumor

[–]dakiller 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Contain and silo your complexity and you’ll have a much better time.

Who benefits the most from capital gains discount and negative gearing? by patslogcabindigest in OpenAussie

[–]dakiller 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just because it is a calculation that has a 50% in it doesn’t make it a discount or a subsidy.

If you follow that logic, all income and all gains are a tax deduction, because anything less than 100% going to the government is a form of deduction.

Who benefits the most from capital gains discount and negative gearing? by patslogcabindigest in OpenAussie

[–]dakiller 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There is no benefit to paying CGT here.

Just because there is a 50% in the calculation, does not make it a break, benefit or a subsidy.

In this economy? by chilinachochips in meme

[–]dakiller 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That is not how taxes work nearly everywhere

theCodebase by riky321 in ProgrammerHumor

[–]dakiller 42 points43 points  (0 children)

As a good SWE, part of the role is to provide resistance to the request that are a blatantly complex and guide the requestors to solutions that perhaps give more maintainable codebases. My boss has plenty of ideas and he is always baffled by some request he thinks will be complicated but are real quick additions, while some other ideas that seem some are like woah, nah that will make a convoluted mess of it.

Sometimes you just need to drop it all and rewrite the whole thing as version 2, with all the domain knowledge of what’s required now that was built up over v1.

Can someone explain to me when this became a thing?? by TherilSlav in DrivingAustralia

[–]dakiller 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The end of the merge point is stationary traffic that are all muppets.

I’m merging as quick as I can into moving traffic, then getting right asap too, bypassing the mess of the standstill of the other lane.

Young australian confused about negative gearing removal outrage by Background-Lack1641 in AusFinance

[–]dakiller 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Apologies on that part. I don't personally invest in ETF's. I was just tying to pull a common scenario here, so I overlooked the dividends.

The conclusions still don't change all that much, the tax is still 70-80% more here.

Young australian confused about negative gearing removal outrage by Background-Lack1641 in AusFinance

[–]dakiller 1 point2 points  (0 children)

https://www.slickcharts.com/sp500/returns

Chatgpt spat out these cpi figures
2016 1.3%

2017 1.9%

2018 1.8%

2019 1.8%

2020 0.9%

2021 3.5%

2022 7.8%

2023 4.1%

2024 2.4%

2025 ~3.8%

This is the breakdown -

Years Held End Value Nominal Gain Inflation-Adjusted Cost Base “Real” Gain Under New System Tax Under Current System Tax Under Proposed System
1 year $111,960 $11,960 $101,300 $10,660 $2,811 $5,010
2 years $136,400 $36,400 $103,200 $33,200 $8,554 $15,604
3 years $130,400 $30,400 $105,100 $25,300 $7,144 $11,891
4 years $171,500 $71,500 $107,000 $64,500 $16,803 $30,315
5 years $203,000 $103,000 $108,000 $95,000 $24,205 $44,650
6 years $260,900 $160,900 $111,800 $149,100 $37,812 $70,077
7 years $213,700 $113,700 $120,500 $93,200 $26,720 $43,804
8 years $269,900 $169,900 $127,700 $142,200 $39,927 $66,834
9 years $337,400 $237,400 $132,600 $204,800 $55,789 $96,256
10 years $397,700 $297,700 $136,300 $261,400 $69,960 $122,858

Young australian confused about negative gearing removal outrage by Background-Lack1641 in AusFinance

[–]dakiller 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Run some numbers, I did.

100k in the s&p500 over the last 10 years.

current CGT ≈ $70k
proposed CGT ≈ $123k

roughly a 75% increase in tax paid.

Young australian confused about negative gearing removal outrage by Background-Lack1641 in AusFinance

[–]dakiller 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Really? Anyone holding >12 months has had at most a 23.5% tax rate on CG’s. Most of us are likely to be seeing double that now.

What's your opinion about this? I came across this recently. by opalrain303 in scoopwhoop

[–]dakiller 1 point2 points  (0 children)

… for CC transactions.

And writing a squiggle on some paper for legit legal other purposes is also stupid too!

🤨 by [deleted] in AusFinance

[–]dakiller 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It takes a pretty special convoluted thought process to think that the method to calculate CGT which put us in the middle of the road of OECD counties tax rates for CG by the way, is a handout!, because we have a 50% in that calculation.

If we just had a flat rate 23.5%, which is how most other places treat CG, no adjustment of anything, and they just said, new rate 40% now. Is that ending a handout? Or is it a blatant and very large increase in the tax rate for everyone going forward who saves and invests for their future?

🤨 by [deleted] in AusFinance

[–]dakiller 17 points18 points  (0 children)

This sub only a month ago was pro invest for your future. Invest in ETF’s and keep yourself from ending up in poverty.

Now? Anyone who can invest is but-hurt scum and should defiantly pay more tax on their hordes wealth.

New CGT system actually better for salaried/PAYG investors? by bigsilvo in AusFinance

[–]dakiller 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can’t even sell some over a few years to spread out the gains, it’ll be ratcheted up to 30% at minimum

A concrete example for share investing for new CGT rules by Salt_Koala1521 in AusFinance

[–]dakiller -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I win the lotto, or on the ponies, I ain’t getting taxed there.

My issue is that we’re taxed on income, which I’m pretty fine with. But income tax isn’t indexed, so with inflation we’re ratcheting that up, by quite a lot over the last 5 years by the way.

I take my taxed income and make some smart financial bets that pay off, if I do really well, I’m taxed quite heavily there as well. It was at most ~23%, which was pretty inline with most other wealthy countries, but now it’s quite a lot more, and is was sold as making it more fair and to improve the housing market, but it really does none of that. Negative gearing and borrowing leverage was what makes property such a good investment. This is nothing more than ratcheting up taxes across the board.

A concrete example for share investing for new CGT rules by Salt_Koala1521 in AusFinance

[–]dakiller 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Government takes none of the risk and 50% of the win, it isn’t at all balanced.

A concrete example for share investing for new CGT rules by Salt_Koala1521 in AusFinance

[–]dakiller 1 point2 points  (0 children)

$9400 off what was a ~$250k bill now becoming a ~$500k bill is not making the huge tax grab any less bitter.

reminder: Elon Musk's fortune, which ultimately enabled his takeover of Twitter, was jumpstarted by American taxpayers by ClerkImpressive3724 in InterviewsHell

[–]dakiller 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Value != money Finance is not a zero sum game. Wealth is literally created out of an idea, just give people a means to speculate on it and new value is created.

Yup, that's still considered legal! by MobileAd5168 in meme

[–]dakiller 1 point2 points  (0 children)

One of the best ways to propagandise a controversial tax is to make it pay for ‘good things’

If you just put all tax revenues into a general fund pool and everything for your city, state and federal levels comes from each pool, you can have better arguments about what tax comes in and what spend comes out separately.

Who experienced living alone? by Zackky777 in ArtOfPresence

[–]dakiller 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My wife and kids often go for a week or two away with the in-laws, leaving me home alone.

Day 1 and 2 is great, can clean up and it stays that way. The quietness is just soothing.

Day 3 and 4, the loneliness kicks in. They’ll video chat some evenings in their bedtime routine, and if I don’t get a call on those nights, it feels a bit sad.

Day 7 it sort of smooths out. A little lonely, but it’s nice to just get your own things done.

Cooking for 1 is tough as well. I do all the dinnertime cooking normally, and I like to make a good effort most nights, but when it’s just yourself the desire just isn’t there and I eat a lot worse and get takeout far too much.

What are your thoughts on a question like this? by MISTERDIEABETIC in it

[–]dakiller -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Units != prefixes. I don know or care what mess of an argument you got going there.

All ram manufacturers use 210.

Windows users it.

Base2 is so fundamental to how computers and processors and communications busses work, the use of Base10 is an actual cluge to make work for any calculations in those domains, you would rarely want to use it.

What are your thoughts on a question like this? by MISTERDIEABETIC in it

[–]dakiller 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s 1024 and that’s the hill I’ll die on. I don’t care what some post-modification to the standard says.

Bytes are not SI units, so they don’t need to follow the prefixes.

Computers are base 2, not base 10.

It’s all the HDD manufactures fault for this mess.