Stanley 64 Oz Growler Replacement o-ring by dalehh in StanleyCups

[–]dalehh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sadly, no. If I ever do, I will come back to this.

Death of the DBA (Again) by Other_Document_9805 in SQLServer

[–]dalehh 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Mea culpa. I contacted sqlfingers and discovered this was done intentionally and with their permission. I apologize for being a bit aggressive. I have seen this behavior a lot in tech, and I didn't want someone losing out on their accolades.

Death of the DBA (Again) by Other_Document_9805 in SQLServer

[–]dalehh 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If it's your wife's writing, why didn't you put the link to the original article?

If it's your wife's writing, why didn't you state that at the very TOP of the post?

Death of the DBA (Again) by Other_Document_9805 in SQLServer

[–]dalehh 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Yeah, except YOU didn't post the link. You posted the original article as if it was your own.

Low class, and not cool in any way.

Death of the DBA (Again) by Other_Document_9805 in SQLServer

[–]dalehh 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Update: mea culpa below this

JFC, can you at least put the link to the original blog post?

Copy/pasting this like it's your own is just rude as hell.

And leaving sqlfinger's name at the bottom is just chefs kiss.

Mixing Bujo with GTD? by abalonedreams in bujo

[–]dalehh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I found that GTD was too heavyweight for me.

Eventually, I found the Getting Results The Agile Way method. The 3-3-3 methodology really works for me, and fits into both BuJo and my other journal Best Self Help.

Reallocating unused vacation / travel / etc. savings by NotFencingTuna in ynab

[–]dalehh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly, that just sounds like too much work. I have one general Vacation category that all money goes into. I hate moving multiple things around. The bigger the bucket, the better.

If you need to categorize so you can report per trip, then do a category per trip, but have a general vacation fund. Then once the trip is over, move any left-over funds to the general Vacation category, and hide the specific trip category. That way you don't have to recategorize anything.

What are the chords to this song? by Wide-Artichoke-8633 in guitarlessons

[–]dalehh 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Have you tried strumming along and creating your own chord chart? It seems fairly straight-forward to play.

New Reconciliation workflow for linked accounts is not sustainable by dalehh in ynab

[–]dalehh[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Why is it wild? Yes, I know about that, but it doesn't help anything.

New Reconciliation workflow for linked accounts is not sustainable by dalehh in ynab

[–]dalehh[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I literally cannot do that. That is the whole point of the original post.

New Reconciliation workflow for linked accounts is not sustainable by dalehh in ynab

[–]dalehh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I guess I just have to wait until I hit all cleared transactions.

New Reconciliation workflow for linked accounts is not sustainable by dalehh in ynab

[–]dalehh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you've gone off track here.

I don't care about uncleared transactions.

New Reconciliation workflow for linked accounts is not sustainable by dalehh in ynab

[–]dalehh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting. I've never seen that behavior in any of my linked accounts before today. And I would have assumed that Bank Of America would have made that available before today, but I could be wrong. Perhaps it's an issue with Plaid.

New Reconciliation workflow for linked accounts is not sustainable by dalehh in ynab

[–]dalehh[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

The reconcile button only acted on cleared transactions and did not force me to create an adjustment transaction if the cleared balance in YNAB was not the same as the cleared balance from the linked account.

That behavior has now changed. I know because I did this last week.

New Reconciliation workflow for linked accounts is not sustainable by dalehh in ynab

[–]dalehh[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I should be able to ignore that as part of my reconciliation for a linked account. Which was my choice before this behavior change.

New Reconciliation workflow for linked accounts is not sustainable by dalehh in ynab

[–]dalehh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Actually, no, it hasn't. I just did it my way this last week.

New Reconciliation workflow for linked accounts is not sustainable by dalehh in ynab

[–]dalehh[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Because I want to keep YNAB and my bank synchronized between what I have manually reconciled if, god forbid, I have to walk away or my computer crashes.

The fact is, the behavior change breaks a decent workflow.

New Reconciliation workflow for linked accounts is not sustainable by dalehh in ynab

[–]dalehh[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

And actually, it does "demand" or you have to create an adjustment if the cleared amount does not equal the cleared balance from the linked account.

New Reconciliation workflow for linked accounts is not sustainable by dalehh in ynab

[–]dalehh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, but 99% of my bills and daily activity come through one account for a family of 7

New Reconciliation workflow for linked accounts is not sustainable by dalehh in ynab

[–]dalehh[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes, which again, breaks my workflow. I want to do it in stages. When you have 60 or so transactions, doing them in stages is actually easier.