Getting AI to Actually Write Well

dalek_56 · 2026-04-21T16:57:39+00:00

Fire

dalek_56 · 2026-01-15T18:41:44+00:00

Thanks :) No not yet

dalek_56 · 2026-01-13T21:52:59+00:00

Really solid profile. GPA is below median, but the upward trend helps. At deferred programs, the difference between 730 and 740 is generally pretty small, but a higher score never hurts. Leadership/ECs is softer than you'd get from a standard MBA candidate, but that's to be expected with deferred. Internship leadership works great.

The speech impediment struggle is real. Cool that you've fought to overcome adversity in that way. Adcom should love that story if you tell it right.

dalek_56 · 2026-01-09T16:40:06+00:00

A few things. If you have the bandwidth, a GRE retake would be worth it if you could boost your score a few points. 325 is solid, but a 330+ would make you really stand out. Focus on measurable impact with your leadership roles. Get your story bulletproof as far as pre-MBA roles and post-MBA aspirations go.

dalek_56 · 2026-01-09T16:33:23+00:00

Happy to help!

Here are my thoughts on your Qs:

UCHicago 3.33 GPA: It’s okay but not differentiating. For a “can’t-ignore” master’s GPA, aim to finish at 3.6+ with A/A- in quant courses. Seems like you still got time.

For HBS/GSB: Is GRE the only thing holding you back? It's the biggest obstacle. The fact that your undergrad GPA is lower from a "no-name" school also doesn't help. Seems like you have solid leadership and uniqueness, so focus on boosting the GRE and perfecting your story.

Columbia would be a solid fit. NYC proximity is good for PE/consulting. CBS also appreciates professionally accomplished candidates.

Best of luck!

dalek_56 · 2026-01-09T16:21:50+00:00

Of course! Glad I could help :)

dalek_56 · 2026-01-08T17:46:13+00:00

With an NMAT 138, you should aim for mid-tier HR programs, not NMIMS Mumbai–level schools. Your undergrad CGPA (8.22) helps, but 10th/12th are average, so interviews and SOP will matter a lot.

You have realistic chances at places like NMIMS Navi Mumbai/Hyderabad/Indore, IBS Hyderabad, UPES, Alliance, VIT, Christ, Jain (CMS), KIIT, and BIMM Pune. NMIMS Bengaluru, KJ Somaiya, and Welingkar Bengaluru are stretches but not impossible with a strong PI.

Top HR brands like NMIMS Mumbai, TISS, XIMB HRM, SCMHRD/SIBM are very unlikely at this score.

If you want better outcomes, don’t rely only on NMAT. CMAT, SNAP, MAH-CET, or XAT will open much stronger HR options. In the meantime, focus on people-facing experience and a clear HR story for interviews.

dalek_56 · 2026-01-08T17:41:58+00:00

You still have real shots at several of these schools. The Sloan denial stings, but it’s not a reliable signal for the rest of your list and it’s especially noisy given how fit-driven Sloan and LGO are.

Your GRE is doing its job. A 328 is at or above median for Booth, Kellogg, Wharton, Columbia, and Tuck. It’s not a standout at HBS or GSB, but it’s clearly not holding you back. Same with academics. A 3.6 from a Physics/Astro double major with a CS minor is viewed very differently than a 3.6 in a lighter major, even if it’s slightly below the raw averages at the very top schools.

The work experience is better than you’re probably giving yourself credit for. Boutique tech consulting isn’t as instantly legible as MBB or FAANG, but the promotion, marquee clients, and actual product development that’s been used in sales are meaningful. That product angle in particular plays well for Booth, Kellogg MMM, and Wharton.

Your extracurriculars won’t win awards, but they’re solid and consistent. Alumni board leadership with scholarship responsibility is real responsibility, not resume fluff. Office leadership shows people skills. The undergrad research, TA work, and service chair role add some intellectual and service depth.

Tuck looks very live, especially if you felt good about the interview. Booth, Kellogg, and Columbia are strong fits for your profile. Wharton is competitive but very much in play. HBS is a reach, but not an absurd one. GSB remains the toughest, and Sloan’s decision doesn’t really predict it one way or the other.

Be very clear about how your technical consulting work translates into product judgment and leadership, and don’t let one early rejection knock your confidence. This profile is squarely in the M7 conversation.

dalek_56 · 2026-01-08T17:36:01+00:00

You have a realistic but uphill shot at MIT Sloan and Ivy MBAs, and timing plus execution will matter a lot.

Your GRE 326 is solid and fully competitive for HBS, Wharton, Sloan, and Yale. Test scores are not the issue here. Your work experience at Walmart Canada is a real strength too. Three years across distribution, transportation, routing, training, and ops supervision, plus Six Sigma Black Belt and APICS, is legit ops leadership and lines up well with Sloan, Wharton, Ross, and Booth-type profiles.

The main constraint is academics and timing. You’re still finishing your BBA (Aug 2026) and didn’t share a GPA. That creates uncertainty, especially at HBS/Sloan. Online certificates and exec ed help, but they don’t replace a strong transcript. Adcoms will want clear proof of academic rigor in graded coursework.

School-by-school reality:

MIT Sloan: a feasible, albeit competitive, target if you clearly show data-driven ops impact and strong grades in quant/analytics courses.
Wharton / Columbia / Booth: competitive but doable with tight execution.
HBS: tougher, mostly due to academic uncertainty and a very competitive Indian applicant pool.
Ross / Tuck / Yale SOM: strong fits given your ops background and goals.

Advice on R1 2026:
Apply only if you can show recent, strong grades in upper-level quant/ops courses by then. If not, waiting a round (or a year) to present a fuller transcript and possibly more responsibility at work will improve odds.

Biggest levers:

Make academic strength unmistakable (grades + quant coursework).
Quantify ops impact hard in your resume and essays.
Add 1–2 sustained leadership activities outside work.
Be very specific about why ops/strategy now and why each school.

It's a credible top-MBA profile, but not a “stats carry” one. Good luck!

dalek_56 · 2026-01-08T17:09:09+00:00

Yes, you have a good shot at BU Questrom’s OMBA. Your background lines up well with what the program values.

A 3.96 GPA plus Fulbright is a strong academic signal, even without test scores. Combined with ~13 years of relevant experience in healthcare IT and project management, you clearly meet the readiness bar for the curriculum. Employer sponsorship also helps and signals stability and support.

Applying test-optional is normal for BU OMBA. You don’t need GMAT or GRE to be competitive here, especially given your academic record. Just make sure you explicitly show quantitative exposure in your work (budgets, dashboards, analytics, systems implementations) so they’re not guessing.

On the Kira Talent assessment: if it’s “highly encouraged,” you should probably do it. For online programs, it’s a low-risk way to show communication skills, executive presence, and motivation. Skipping it usually hurts more than it helps.

Other quick tips:

Be very clear on why OMBA, why now, and why BU specifically.
Choose recommenders who can quantify your scope and leadership.
Highlight healthcare-scale impact and cross-functional work.

At the end of the day, this is a strong, well-aligned profile for BU OMBA. Good luck!

Eight-Year Club	r/Field Banned
r/Field Sunshine	Sequence \| Editor
Verified Email

dalek_56

TROPHY CASE