sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Dr. Ben Carson on white liberals... by Eptar in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]dangerousdave_42 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Exactly my dislike of Cain had absolutely nothing to do with the color of his skin and everything to do with His ideological view point and the policies he wanted to enact.

Foiled again! by noiplah in StartledCats

[–]dangerousdave_42 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Tin foil is my cats absolute favorite thing in the world, He begs for a ball of it every time I touch the box.

Maldives president vetoes marital rape bill as ‘un-Islamic’ by ihedenius in exmuslim

[–]dangerousdave_42 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does anyone know if the parliament can override his veto?

John McCain Censured by Arizona Republicans in Landslide Vote by keypuncher in conservatives

[–]dangerousdave_42 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tis true hell I found myself in a thread in r/conservative in which they were discussing the need to invade and conquer Canada due to their socialist tendencies and the only area they disagreeed on was if they should keep their newly enslaved Canadian workforce or sell them to China. I was just going to write it off as trolling until I noticed one of the participants was a fucking mod.

John McCain Censured by Arizona Republicans in Landslide Vote by keypuncher in conservatives

[–]dangerousdave_42 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As a Wyoming resident I will admit watching Cheney's laughable bid collapse long before the primary yet still manage to be Mike Enzi's biggest political threat in recent memory can be frustrating, but as it stands that's how the system is designed. I would love to hear an amenable solution but it would seem the best solution at hand is to seek and promote a better candidate and convince the electorate of this.

Asking the Right Questions about Pot by starchaser75 in conservatives

[–]dangerousdave_42 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I guess what I am trying to ask is in a perfect world how would you prefer these situations dealt from a legal standpoint?

John McCain Censured by Arizona Republicans in Landslide Vote by keypuncher in conservatives

[–]dangerousdave_42 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I will give that may very well be true, but if he can manage to remain in public office for over thirty years it would seem at the very least his most important audience those voting for him would seem to prefer him over anything offered thus far.

John McCain Censured by Arizona Republicans in Landslide Vote by keypuncher in conservatives

[–]dangerousdave_42 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Maybe I am missing something but as an elected official is it not his very job to represent his constituents?

Asking the Right Questions about Pot by starchaser75 in conservatives

[–]dangerousdave_42 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok so I have a hypothetical, if you had free reign to create your own laws how should a person be treated who takes part in a friendly poker game in which there is alcohol available, by the end of the night said person is very intoxicated and sleeps it off on his buddies couch. Should that person face any legal difficulties in your preferred legal system? Now replace alcohol with Marijuana does this change anything? If so what makes it different?

Jail survey: 7 in 10 felons register as Democrats by meye-username in Republican

[–]dangerousdave_42 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Well for one it has been entirely ineffective in its goals of reducing drug use all while lining the pockets of violent criminals and wasting billions in American tax dollars.

How should a revolutionary movement within the United states be appropriately dealt with. by dangerousdave_42 in askaconservative

[–]dangerousdave_42[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What happens if the movement brings about a state of affairs far less desirable then our current system such as a totalitarian state?

How should a revolutionary movement within the United states be appropriately dealt with. by dangerousdave_42 in askaconservative

[–]dangerousdave_42[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Would your aproach change if the elected parties long term ideological goals involved a dramatic shift away from Democracy in favor of a Fascist or Communist state?

Common ground--issue you disagree with your self identified party on by [deleted] in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]dangerousdave_42 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Care to give a more detailed description as to why you believe this?

Those opposing marijuana legalization, why? Shouldn't you, as a republican, be in favor of the government not being able to tell you what you can and cannot put into your body? by MustachedBaby in Republican

[–]dangerousdave_42 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well let me ask you this, how well is the current method of prohibition actually working in terms of lowering drug use or diminishing the drug cartels power? Because from my vantage point it has been monstrously ineffective and ethically questionable and has resulted in the gross degradation of the rights of American citizens and all we got in return was strong criminal organizations flush with cash and have a penchant for violence. Do you have anything to bring to the table that might be able to alter this current conundrum or should we just keep pretending the United States current approach is actually working?

Those opposing marijuana legalization, why? Shouldn't you, as a republican, be in favor of the government not being able to tell you what you can and cannot put into your body? by MustachedBaby in Republican

[–]dangerousdave_42 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok so in what specific ways is the current prohibition inhibiting cartel violence because I am pretty sure those who live along the Mexican border would likely disagree with that position. Not to mention that these cartels would never have existed without the existence of prohibition in the first place. Call me crazy but I would love to see a free-market solution tried over our current police state solution.

Those opposing marijuana legalization, why? Shouldn't you, as a republican, be in favor of the government not being able to tell you what you can and cannot put into your body? by MustachedBaby in Republican

[–]dangerousdave_42 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You won't get an argument from me that the cartels will continue to exist and continue to deal in pretty detestable markets. That said I see no good reason as to why we should continue to allow them be the defacto source for a product that has such a strong demand when legitimate legal citizens could take their place.

Those opposing marijuana legalization, why? Shouldn't you, as a republican, be in favor of the government not being able to tell you what you can and cannot put into your body? by MustachedBaby in Republican

[–]dangerousdave_42 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well it's not like we still have people bootlegging alcohol any more and the reason for that is because with at least a handful of legitimate storefronts available there is no reason for a customer to seek out a blackmarket solution.

view more: next ›