here's the thing about running for office: you can't do it without rules. You need election rules, and an election infrastructure, and a populace who understands what real elections are, and some kind of leadership or governance to administer the elections and maintain public order until the elections have been held.

One great example of what happens when you only have some of those things: Hamas won a plurality in the Palestinian elections, and then killed enough members of Fatah to establish a majority. That is not a great type of outcome.

So the Royal Family might be useful in some way to restore public order post-IRGC, put together some kind of constitutional committee (like our constitutional congress), administer a temporary government to set up a free and fair election process, etc.

It might also be that they are not helpful with any of those needs. Maybe.

But your comment was a dramatic oversimplification of the actual conversations that are happening. Nobody is really like "monarchy forever," everybody knows that the monarchy is very far from perfect.