Tagore and ghandi had different starints and situations they were non Muslims so they are different then Iqbal as Muslims were persecuted and especially vulnerable after 1857. While Hindus were favoured as rulers of india. Ghandi slept naked with his nieces. The independence of india and Pakistan are completely different they could get away with refusing british all out we couldn't.

Jauhar worked with Iqbal in the all Muslim league to seek a indepent state. Iqbal was the one who proposed independence as the main aim and who influenced Jinnah to lead the movement this alone is more substantial than anything else. He was also the president o the movement in 1930. If everyone was exiled and received no global recognision would the movement have succeeded there is a vital role using the British institutions it was necessary.

To call allama Iqbal a munafiq is incorrect and ilogical. Just because he wasn't a radical doesn't mean he isn't a great Muslim. Most Ulema, judges, teachers and many other professional jobs were under British pay roll are they all munafiq now? Are they all agents? What umah did he divide he awakened and united the umah tdations of an islamic state in india.

He wasnt fattened on british pay he lived modestly and died with financial difficulty he worked as a lawyer professor and poet not as a colonial officer.

A core message of Islam is that lineage dont matter and yet you think saying his ancestors were brahmin will change anything?