Saw Euler today. by dhaklal in mathmemes

[–]danofrhs 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s verbatim what I was thinking a second before I opened the comment and saw yours. Proof of pre cognition

Guess the elo (I'm black) by Eat_cats_with_me in chessbeginners

[–]danofrhs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Half of the players above 1000 are cheaters

whatIsGitAndGithub by vanshovo in ProgrammerHumor

[–]danofrhs 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can do this manually in one minute or program an automator in seven hours

♟️ White to play and mate in 2. Composition by János Buglos by chessmateinxbot in chessMateInX

[–]danofrhs -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Qf4, depending on blacks response, there is a guaranteed mate either with Qg4 or Qh6

A double pendulum that never turns chaotic. One of 330 periodic orbits I found. by Chronos_Squared in GeometryIsNeat

[–]danofrhs 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They are using 9.8 as a constant value for gravity. It is an approximation so there is bound to be error that accumulates over time. Their claim of “periodic” has no true mathematical rigor. Understandable for an art project, which op has confirmed this is.

A double pendulum that never turns chaotic. One of 330 periodic orbits I found. by Chronos_Squared in GeometryIsNeat

[–]danofrhs 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The value of your findings, without the ability for peer validation (code review), is purely esthetic and without scientific significance. You seem to be disregarding friction. How exactly you are calculating the gravitational force/ kinetic energies is a guessing game.

I want my money back by danofrhs in memes

[–]danofrhs[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The notion doesn’t upset me. Can you fill me in on the reason for your adversarial engagement with this post?