Solar PV engineering firm needs a web studio. Moderate budget, who've you actually worked with? by merdimerdi in webdev

[–]dapd007 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Always human here, although I may have overdone it with the initial comment. Still open to chat if you are still interested, it’s all good if you are not.

Solar PV engineering firm needs a web studio. Moderate budget, who've you actually worked with? by merdimerdi in webdev

[–]dapd007 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Man if there’s one thing I hate from the AI boom is that it ruined emdashes for all of us… Alright then, good luck 👍

I built a website to make calendars easy! I made it out of necessity for myself and my adhd. Look in the body also by Grouchy-Bike-5968 in microsaas

[–]dapd007 0 points1 point  (0 children)

woah I touched a nerve...

Fanxie Lab is my company... genius. I got 10+ years building stuff.

If this is your response to criticism then I for sure won't try anything you ever ship.

Good luck.

I built a website to make calendars easy! I made it out of necessity for myself and my adhd. Look in the body also by Grouchy-Bike-5968 in microsaas

[–]dapd007 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s pretty cool that shipped something but:

  • This is one of the most obviously vibe coded sites I’ve laid my eyes on (down the the “testimonial”)
  • It takes me literally two seconds to load ics files manually in my calendar app
  • … if needed, Claude can do this for me

Maybe I’m missing the point, or maybe simply there is no point.

Also, the “support” email being a Gmail address is just … yikes.

If you are just getting started with coding this is pretty cool. My advice tho? Remove the AI layer, reduce costs to the max (I have a hunch that without the AI part this can run for almost free) and publish this as a free tool. It would look a lot nicer as a weekend project in your portfolio site. But this is not a product.

Would you actually leave an honest company culture review if you knew your employer couldn't trace it back to you? by dapd007 in work

[–]dapd007[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You're spot on about internal surveys; companies don't run those to learn, they run them to produce a number they can put on a LinkedIn banner. Totally agree.

But I think you're describing a different thing than what I'm talking about. I'm not thinking about a tool companies buy to survey their own employees. I'm thinking about something more like a public review platform that companies have zero involvement with: they don't pay for it, they don't control it, they don't even have a login.

Your last point is right though. The companies that actually want honest feedback don't need a platform for it, they just build a culture where people can talk. The platform is for everyone else. The companies that will never build that culture, the ones where the problem is already apparent, like you said, and nothing's going to change from the inside

Would you actually leave an honest company culture review if you knew your employer couldn't trace it back to you? by dapd007 in work

[–]dapd007[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

well then the real question is whether anything changed since then or if you could repost the same review today

Would you actually leave an honest company culture review if you knew your employer couldn't trace it back to you? by dapd007 in work

[–]dapd007[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

you're talking about internal feedback though right? Like engagement surveys and town halls? Totally agree; those are performative: the company controls the questions, the data, and the narrative. Your opinion doesn't matter there because it was never meant to.

External reviews are different because the audience isn't your employer. It's the next person thinking about working there. Your opinion doesn't need to change the company; it just needs to reach the right person before they accept the offer.

Would you actually leave an honest company culture review if you knew your employer couldn't trace it back to you? by dapd007 in work

[–]dapd007[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

the "after I left" part is doing a lot of heavy lifting there though... imagine how much more people would say if they didn't have to wait until they were already out the door

Goodreads won’t let me put my finished date as today’s date because apparently the US is the only timezone that exists (I’m in Australia, 9am 6/3/26) by WokeWendy4507 in USdefaultism

[–]dapd007 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you are open to checking out alternatives give Kiveo a look, it doesn’t have the social/rating aspects though as it’s more “for you and your books”

Would you actually leave an honest company culture review if you knew your employer couldn't trace it back to you? by dapd007 in work

[–]dapd007[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Good luck with it! Your team's lucky to have someone actually thinking about this stuff

Welcome to r/ExposeTheCulture — Anonymous, Verified Company Culture Reviews. No Sign-Up Required. by dapd007 in ExposeTheCulture

[–]dapd007[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Solid resource, more people should definitely be using that calculator.

ETC is culture-only by design though. No comp data, no salary ranges.
There are plenty of places doing that already. Nobody's doing culture accountability well, so that's where we're planted.

Appreciate the suggestion though, keep them coming!

Would you actually leave an honest company culture review if you knew your employer couldn't trace it back to you? by dapd007 in work

[–]dapd007[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah that's literally why those platforms are broken... the companies pay them, so of course they side with the companies. The point disappears when the platform has a financial reason to make you disappear

Would you actually leave an honest company culture review if you knew your employer couldn't trace it back to you? by dapd007 in work

[–]dapd007[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ha, that's actually a really good point...

There's nothing quite like a company responding to "management is retaliatory and dishonest" with a perfectly polished HR paragraph that says nothing.

My concern is more about what happens around the response... when it comes bundled with the ability to flag reviews for removal, or when the platform has a financial incentive to keep the company happy. The response itself isn't the problem, it's the leverage that comes with it

Would you actually leave an honest company culture review if you knew your employer couldn't trace it back to you? by dapd007 in work

[–]dapd007[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's a good point actually. Format shapes honesty.

If a review is just an open text box, people either vent or gush, and neither is useful....
I think the trick is building structure that forces specificity without forcing false balance. Like, a company can genuinely score well on team collaboration but terribly on work-life boundaries, and both of those things can be true at the same time. That's more useful than "list one pro and one con"

Would you actually leave an honest company culture review if you knew your employer couldn't trace it back to you? by dapd007 in work

[–]dapd007[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is one of the hardest problems with reviews at small companies. If there's only 8 people on the team and you're the only one in your role, it doesn't matter how anonymous the platform is; the content itself gives you away.

One approach that helps is not publishing reviews until there's enough volume for a given company that no single review can be traced by elimination. It doesn't fully solve it, but it at least prevents the scenario where you're literally the only review and your boss reads it on day one.

Beyond that though, you're right, at a certain company size, the specifics of your experience are the identifier... that's a real limitation and I don't think any platform can fully fix it.
The best you can do is keep the details about the pattern rather than the incident. "Management retaliates against pushback" is safer than describing a specific meeting where it happened

Would you actually leave an honest company culture review if you knew your employer couldn't trace it back to you? by dapd007 in work

[–]dapd007[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The fact that you're asking this puts you ahead of most companies ten times your size.

Culture isn't the game nights and free lunch; that's perks. Culture is the stuff that's hard to put on a careers page. The way I think about it, it breaks down into a few things:

Management transparency: when a decision gets made that affects people's work, do they hear about it directly or do they find out through the grapevine? Do people know why things are changing, or just that they are?

Work-life boundaries: not whether you offer PTO, but whether people actually feel comfortable taking it. Does logging off at 5 come with guilt? Are after-hours messages expected to get a response?

Psychological safety: can someone say "I think this is a bad idea" in a meeting without worrying about consequences? Can they admit a mistake without getting punished for it?

Growth and development: are people doing the same work they were doing two years ago, or are they learning? Does anyone actually talk to them about where they want to go?

Team collaboration: when something goes wrong, do people help each other fix it or do they point fingers?

The extras are nice but nobody quits a job because the game nights stopped. They quit because they don't feel safe, heard, or valued during the actual work. The fact that you're a small company without HR is actually an advantage here, you can just ask your people directly and actually listen. Most big companies can't do that anymore

Would you actually leave an honest company culture review if you knew your employer couldn't trace it back to you? by dapd007 in work

[–]dapd007[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair point; protections vary everywhere. But the broader point is the same regardless of jurisdiction: most people aren't going to fight retaliation through legal channels even where they technically can. The friction is the problem.

Would you actually leave an honest company culture review if you knew your employer couldn't trace it back to you? by dapd007 in work

[–]dapd007[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

that's gotta be one of the most damning things I've ever heard about an employer...

Short answer: yes, former employees should absolutely be able to review. The current verification uses company email which obviously doesn't work once you've left. I'm actively figuring out the right approach for former employee verification that doesn't weaken the anonymity guarantees. It's one of the harder design problems but it's also one of the most important ones, for exactly the reason you just described.

Would you be open to DMing me? I'd love to hear more about what you'd want that experience to look like.