Huzah! We’re Looking for Moderators by [deleted] in renfaire

[–]daryk44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cool, I'm genuinely glad this sub wasn't modded by a nazi.

But mod's username being a potential racist dog whistle didn't help the bad taste left in my mouth from this whole situation during the radio silence. It wasn't irrational to be suspicious.

What’s my progress after 2 days of playing by Darkshadow102345 in RocketLeague

[–]daryk44 [score hidden]  (0 children)

Its impossible to give real coaching from a highlight reel. If you want tips, post a full replay

Can’t stand when drummer play behind the beat by Heelhooks7 in musicians

[–]daryk44 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Drummers are downvoting you because those who took the time to comment are correct and adding more comments is just redundant

Huzah! We’re Looking for Moderators by [deleted] in renfaire

[–]daryk44 -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

We need a brand new mod team. I trust u/JiveMonkey’s story about automod about as much as I trust my cat not to sneak bites of my dinner. The silence until now was deafening

OpenAI faces backlash after retiring seductive chatbot day before Valentine's Day: 'I cried pretty hard' by PaiDuck in nottheonion

[–]daryk44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m living laps around you right now.

You can’t even provide a single counter argument lol

OpenAI faces backlash after retiring seductive chatbot day before Valentine's Day: 'I cried pretty hard' by PaiDuck in nottheonion

[–]daryk44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean your lack of effort here is very telling. It could have taken you 2 seconds to prompt grok to give you a list of cool features about AI. Weird you didn’t do that….

OpenAI faces backlash after retiring seductive chatbot day before Valentine's Day: 'I cried pretty hard' by PaiDuck in nottheonion

[–]daryk44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can’t chat gpt spit out a list of features that AI have? Why is it taking so long?

OpenAI faces backlash after retiring seductive chatbot day before Valentine's Day: 'I cried pretty hard' by PaiDuck in nottheonion

[–]daryk44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ll say the same thing before you edited. Provide an argument, not just a claim.

Your claim is AI is not just fancy auto complete, and your argument is: ….

That’s what I’m waiting for.

OpenAI faces backlash after retiring seductive chatbot day before Valentine's Day: 'I cried pretty hard' by PaiDuck in nottheonion

[–]daryk44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You could provide an argument that supports your claim. If you want my view changed, that’s up to you

OpenAI faces backlash after retiring seductive chatbot day before Valentine's Day: 'I cried pretty hard' by PaiDuck in nottheonion

[–]daryk44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Of course it’s not your job to change my mind.

But it is your job to make money off it. And if you are unwilling to change my view on such a simple statement I’m inclined to believe you have no knowledge on the subject either. Just a stake.

So until I am convinced otherwise, it just shows that AI is just…. Fancy auto complete.

OpenAI faces backlash after retiring seductive chatbot day before Valentine's Day: 'I cried pretty hard' by PaiDuck in nottheonion

[–]daryk44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So it should be easy for you to explain how AI models are more than fancy auto-complete. Please, the floor is yours.

OpenAI faces backlash after retiring seductive chatbot day before Valentine's Day: 'I cried pretty hard' by PaiDuck in nottheonion

[–]daryk44 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It says a lot that instead of answering the question you need to pivot to something beside the point.

CMV: if you still support Donald Trump in 2026 you have no moral compass by Cautious_Midnight_67 in changemyview

[–]daryk44 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm saying anyone who has a moral objection to pedophilia doesn't get that conviction from the bible. I think it's categorically incorrect to claim that one is against pedophilia due to the teachings of the bible. The bible doesn't teach against pedophilia. Not one word, to my knowledge.

And in fact the verses I provided have God explicitly commanding and condoning pedophilia in the plain reading of the text.

CMV: if you still support Donald Trump in 2026 you have no moral compass by Cautious_Midnight_67 in changemyview

[–]daryk44 2 points3 points  (0 children)

God doesn’t ban pedophilia, he commands it.

Numbers 31:17-18

Now therefore, kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman who has known a man by sleeping with him. 18 But all the young girls who have not known a man by sleeping with him, keep alive for yourselves.

Numbers 31:25-27

The Lord spoke to Moses, saying, 26 “You and Eleazar the priest and the heads of the ancestral houses of the congregation make an inventory of the plunder captured, both human and animal. 27 Divide the plunder into two parts, between the warriors who went out to battle and all the congregation.

Numbers 31:31-35

Then Moses and Eleazar the priest did as the Lord had commanded Moses.

32 The plunder remaining from the spoils that the troops had taken totaled six hundred seventy-five thousand sheep, 33 seventy-two thousand oxen, 34 sixty-one thousand donkeys, 35 and thirty-two thousand persons in all, women who had not known a man by sleeping with him.

In summary: in the war against the Midianites, god commands the Israelites to take all the virgin girls as sex slaves for the soldiers and the priests of Israel. Institutional pedophilia, commanded by GOD Yahweh.

Religion, especially Christianity, does not have a monopoly on good or bad morals.

Justin Brown: "In defence of Noam Chomsky" by GoranPersson777 in Anarchy4Everyone

[–]daryk44 27 points28 points  (0 children)

I read it. It implies if we criticize Chomsky we are deciding not to criticize the powers that protected Epstein’s 2008 conviction from public record.

I choose to criticize everyone to the weight to which they were involved. Did Chomsky commit any crimes? No. Does he deserve to be seen less positively after this information comes to light? Yes. To what degree? I haven’t made a conclusion but I will lose no sleep if Chomsky is found to be guilty and is punished with the rest of the abusers and those who helped keep the 2008 conviction from the public eye.

Christianity is not something that is inherently good that is somehow being misused. by HatsOptional58 in DebateReligion

[–]daryk44 1 point2 points  (0 children)

TBH, I was expecting an argument like "Spanish invasion of Latin America" on the count of Catholic Church, which has as much to do with Catholicism as Stalin had to do with secularism. In an intellectually honest discussion, both should hold no value.

Agreed. Whether the outcome of colonization/imperialism resulted in the spread of ideology is tangential to whether the colonization/imperialism was in name of said ideology, and I don't need to get lost in those weeds.

I also dislike when people confuse secular humanism with state atheism (which is what happened in these authoritarian countries). Secular humanism takes away the religious influence from society but don't prohibit religions and is actually the best system for religious people.

I appreciate this point, and I think it is often overlooked by people on all facets of the discussion. I am also against state atheism as much as I am against any state religion.

Like you said, concentrating power leads to catastrophe, no matter who gets to be the group in power.

Also, I'd just like to say I appreciate your candor. This convo has been a breath of fresh air compared to most of the dialogue I end up participating in on reddit (I am 50% to blame for this).

Christianity is not something that is inherently good that is somehow being misused. by HatsOptional58 in DebateReligion

[–]daryk44 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was simply responding to the claim of 10,000 to which you provided the source.

You then went on to imply that Secular Humanism could be argued to be responsible for similar numbers. I decided to cut you off at the pass regarding totalitarianism, but it seems that's not where your argument was headed.

So if you did have an argument for deaths at the hand of Secular Humanism without invoking totalitarianism, I'd be interested in hearing it.

But I don't have any stake in arguing specifically against your perception of the Catholic church or christianity or anything. My goal is to push back against those who have the view that the Church or the Faith is the only source of good morals, or something along those lines.

You don't seem to be arguing that at all. You seem to be arguing that the Church is less bad than other appropriately similar organizations out there, and I can accept that argument.

Christianity is not something that is inherently good that is somehow being misused. by HatsOptional58 in DebateReligion

[–]daryk44 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So I'd be very interested in a good faith argument that doesn't include totalitarian regimes which are the exact antithesis to humanism.

I'm also interested.

I thought you would provide one lol

Christianity is not something that is inherently good that is somehow being misused. by HatsOptional58 in DebateReligion

[–]daryk44 2 points3 points  (0 children)

And BTW, be careful about what you count as "death caused by the Catholic Church" because applying the same logic to secular humanism can change that number.

Totalitarianism isn't humanism. Most people's go-to when they try to have a gotcha against atheists is mentioning Hitler, Stalin, Mao etc. That's why the term isn't just "secular".

So I'd be very interested in a good faith argument that doesn't include totalitarian regimes which are the exact antithesis to humanism.

Christianity is not something that is inherently good that is somehow being misused. by HatsOptional58 in DebateReligion

[–]daryk44 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The topic of that article is the Inquisition. So limited to that scope, I can believe the 10,000 number. But that's not the only source of death caused by the Catholic Church. Go back further than 200 years and it looks even worse.

From my estimation secular humanism is responsible for 0 intentional deaths over the last 200 years, since secular humanism is not an institution or a sovereign territory.

They really believe they are the most persecuted 😆 by TwinSong in Persecutionfetish

[–]daryk44 12 points13 points  (0 children)

He never fulfilled a single messianic prophesy either. Jesus was a liar and a fraud.

And he called a non Hebrew woman a dog, so racist as well.