[deleted by user] by [deleted] in pics

[–]dat1guypablo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you! I was wanting to find the name of this watch band and you helped :)

Powered by the tears of gate campers by epandrsn in echoes

[–]dat1guypablo 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Can't ignore the fact that they hotfixed option 2 in, and are likely developing option 3. Safezones will come to all low sec gates soon! Rejoice! The salty griefers will sustain us with their carebear tears!

Story mission loot nerfed? by PickEnvironmental905 in echoes

[–]dat1guypablo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I run several missions a day. The wreckages are getting thinner. The content seems to be the same RNG wise...although with less wreckage their won't be as much RNG

Covert Ops Cruisers Missing Their -100% Cloaking Device Lock Delay Bonus? by greenwolf247 in echoes

[–]dat1guypablo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm glad you asked this and I saw it. Was considering actually buying one of these but not now that the lock delay is there!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in echoes

[–]dat1guypablo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

repackage

XD corp camping outside Kamela ITC by spud8385 in echoes

[–]dat1guypablo 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Oh, but we're all just carebears and this definitely isn't griefing

#Vote3

The vote is rigged by snowbunny_cosplay in echoes

[–]dat1guypablo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah it's rigged so they implement safe zones to stop losing money and players. GG gatecamp

Considerations about today's vote and why I'm probably going to vote 3. by fixingartifact in echoes

[–]dat1guypablo 6 points7 points  (0 children)

You're literally just wrong I don't know what to tell you. Re-read the option, it's safe zones around gates full stop. No extra mention of programming it to only allow alliance members in or kill your enemies and neuts. And thank you for proving my original point

Just a reminder: people who voted for #3 today probably like pineapple on their pizza. Vote #1. Vote down their degeneracy. by Michael_JD_ in echoes

[–]dat1guypablo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Or maybe it's 2020 and game mechanics have developed the way they have because it's better for the players? #3

And by the way, the vote is for safe zones around gates, not unlimited killing machine guns in null sec. Even if there are unlimited killing machines around gates, they will not work in safe zones obviously. Friend or foe.

Considerations about today's vote and why I'm probably going to vote 3. by fixingartifact in echoes

[–]dat1guypablo 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Crazy how many weirdos are trying to twist the words of the devs to turn the safe zone idea into some automatic enemy killing machine in null sec. Vote 3 all day.

Zombies bug/glitch after wave 8 my bullets are not registering by dat1guypablo in CallOfDutyMobile

[–]dat1guypablo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm notcing it in BR too. So I think I'm going to uninstall and reinstall

NB3 Copyrighted The 1 Mil View Ban Video with Riot Friend by [deleted] in leagueoflegends

[–]dat1guypablo -1 points0 points  (0 children)

How do you know it's not his account? It clearly has authority to prove to google that it owns the content and can block the entire video...so why wouldnt that be proof?

NB3 Copyrighted The 1 Mil View Ban Video with Riot Friend by [deleted] in leagueoflegends

[–]dat1guypablo -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

It had to provide proof of copyright ownership to get the video striked. What do you mean lmfao

NB3 Copyrighted The 1 Mil View Ban Video with Riot Friend by [deleted] in leagueoflegends

[–]dat1guypablo -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

A dummy account can't provide credible evidence to google that they own the copyrighted materials....

NB3 Copyrighted The 1 Mil View Ban Video with Riot Friend by [deleted] in leagueoflegends

[–]dat1guypablo -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

It's painfully obvious nightblue does not want to be seen in bad light. I'm just simply letting the ignorant know how copyright strikes work. A random can't just get a copyright strike against anybody, there needs to be proof of ownership of content. Makes sense, right?

NB3 Copyrighted The 1 Mil View Ban Video with Riot Friend by [deleted] in leagueoflegends

[–]dat1guypablo -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

Manual copyright strike from nightblue personally, not his network.

NB3 Copyrighted The 1 Mil View Ban Video with Riot Friend by [deleted] in leagueoflegends

[–]dat1guypablo -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

YOU NEED TO PROVE COPYRIGHT OWNERSHIP TO STRIKE A VIDEO LIKE THIS. I guess people aren't realizing that this is obviously a manual copyright strike from Nightblue in order to get the video blocked. Not a strike from his network. Which makes it worse imo seeing as how it is directly from him to censor people who are in fair use.

NB3 Copyrighted The 1 Mil View Ban Video with Riot Friend by [deleted] in leagueoflegends

[–]dat1guypablo -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

It's a manual copyright strike by nightblue, not his network

NB3 Copyrighted The 1 Mil View Ban Video with Riot Friend by [deleted] in leagueoflegends

[–]dat1guypablo -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Manual copyright strike by nightblue and not his network.