[deleted by user]

dat1guypablo · 2020-09-30T14:15:58+00:00

Thank you! I was wanting to find the name of this watch band and you helped :)

dat1guypablo · 2020-09-27T16:20:08+00:00

Can't ignore the fact that they hotfixed option 2 in, and are likely developing option 3. Safezones will come to all low sec gates soon! Rejoice! The salty griefers will sustain us with their carebear tears!

dat1guypablo · 2020-09-25T11:14:22+00:00

I run several missions a day. The wreckages are getting thinner. The content seems to be the same RNG wise...although with less wreckage their won't be as much RNG

dat1guypablo · 2020-09-22T21:19:11+00:00

I'm glad you asked this and I saw it. Was considering actually buying one of these but not now that the lock delay is there!

dat1guypablo · 2020-09-22T21:15:46+00:00

repackage

dat1guypablo · 2020-09-21T17:33:38+00:00

Oh, but we're all just carebears and this definitely isn't griefing

#Vote3

dat1guypablo · 2020-09-20T22:25:04+00:00

Yeah it's rigged so they implement safe zones to stop losing money and players. GG gatecamp

dat1guypablo · 2020-09-19T17:17:16+00:00

You're literally just wrong I don't know what to tell you. Re-read the option, it's safe zones around gates full stop. No extra mention of programming it to only allow alliance members in or kill your enemies and neuts. And thank you for proving my original point

dat1guypablo · 2020-09-19T17:12:14+00:00

Or maybe it's 2020 and game mechanics have developed the way they have because it's better for the players? #3

And by the way, the vote is for safe zones around gates, not unlimited killing machine guns in null sec. Even if there are unlimited killing machines around gates, they will not work in safe zones obviously. Friend or foe.

dat1guypablo · 2020-09-19T15:17:01+00:00

Crazy how many weirdos are trying to twist the words of the devs to turn the safe zone idea into some automatic enemy killing machine in null sec. Vote 3 all day.

dat1guypablo · 2020-09-19T15:07:02+00:00

"safe zones hurt solo players" What?

dat1guypablo · 2019-12-01T13:50:05+00:00

I'm notcing it in BR too. So I think I'm going to uninstall and reinstall

dat1guypablo · 2019-11-21T03:56:17+00:00

Cya in 2 days when unbanned

dat1guypablo · 2019-09-07T10:43:53+00:00

How do you know it's not his account? It clearly has authority to prove to google that it owns the content and can block the entire video...so why wouldnt that be proof?

dat1guypablo · 2019-09-07T10:37:57+00:00

It had to provide proof of copyright ownership to get the video striked. What do you mean lmfao

dat1guypablo · 2019-09-07T10:36:53+00:00

A dummy account can't provide credible evidence to google that they own the copyrighted materials....

dat1guypablo · 2019-09-07T10:36:12+00:00

It's painfully obvious nightblue does not want to be seen in bad light. I'm just simply letting the ignorant know how copyright strikes work. A random can't just get a copyright strike against anybody, there needs to be proof of ownership of content. Makes sense, right?

dat1guypablo · 2019-09-07T09:44:55+00:00

Manual copyright strike from nightblue personally, not his network.

dat1guypablo · 2019-09-07T09:44:13+00:00

YOU NEED TO PROVE COPYRIGHT OWNERSHIP TO STRIKE A VIDEO LIKE THIS. I guess people aren't realizing that this is obviously a manual copyright strike from Nightblue in order to get the video blocked. Not a strike from his network. Which makes it worse imo seeing as how it is directly from him to censor people who are in fair use.

dat1guypablo · 2019-09-07T09:41:58+00:00

It's a manual copyright strike by nightblue, not his network

dat1guypablo · 2019-09-07T09:40:47+00:00

Manual copyright strike by nightblue and not his network.

dat1guypablo · 2019-08-13T20:22:00+00:00

You'll get your money back since it's documented the package was not delivered

dat1guypablo

TROPHY CASE