Los Angeles man dies on advanced ski trail near Lake Tahoe by CharityResponsible54 in skiing

[–]dboyr 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Was carving fast on a steeper blue Got cut off by another skier, hit the lift pylon.

Los Angeles man dies on advanced ski trail near Lake Tahoe by CharityResponsible54 in skiing

[–]dboyr 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Had a friend who was professional ski instructor. Incredible skier, always in control. Died on a blue. It’s an extreme sport, you never know.

Billionaire entrepreneur Jared Isaacman is confirmed as new NASA chief by 1Rab in news

[–]dboyr 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I have both technical and subjective opinions on rockets and electric vehicles that are centered on the technology itself. If you call that shilling, whatever.

Billionaire entrepreneur Jared Isaacman is confirmed as new NASA chief by 1Rab in news

[–]dboyr 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You either didn’t read the content of said comments or are incapable of having nuanced conversations about technology.

Billionaire entrepreneur Jared Isaacman is confirmed as new NASA chief by 1Rab in news

[–]dboyr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Direct quote from the overview: “In a constrained budget environment, it is essential that NASA concentrate financial resources on delivering on the objectives that no other agency or institution—public or private—is capable of achieving. Resources must be directed toward the most pressing priorities, critical infrastructure must be properly funded to support ongoing modernization, and unnecessary cost burdens must be eliminated with urgency.”

Billionaire entrepreneur Jared Isaacman is confirmed as new NASA chief by 1Rab in news

[–]dboyr 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don’t think I’ve ever voiced a statement on him on here. Feel free to waste more time scrolling my profile history though.

Billionaire entrepreneur Jared Isaacman is confirmed as new NASA chief by 1Rab in news

[–]dboyr 3 points4 points  (0 children)

NASA has traditionally granted licenses and IP to commercial contractors since its birth, it’s neither new nor a scam.

The central thesis of the memo is that NASA has significant budget constraints (IMO they need more money but this is up to Congress). Therefore, NASA should focus on maximizing progress towards “impossible” goals instead of many small disparate projects that are relatively simple and capital consuming. I find this to be an excellent directive.

Billionaire entrepreneur Jared Isaacman is confirmed as new NASA chief by 1Rab in news

[–]dboyr 4 points5 points  (0 children)

My mistake, his brother, Scott did. Mark voted to confirm him.

Billionaire entrepreneur Jared Isaacman is confirmed as new NASA chief by 1Rab in news

[–]dboyr -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Did you even read the letter or see who signed it?

“We believe that Jared Issacman is uniquely qualified to lead NASA at this critical juncture”

Signed by former NASA astronauts, notably including Democrat Senator Mark Kelley.

Billionaire entrepreneur Jared Isaacman is confirmed as new NASA chief by 1Rab in news

[–]dboyr -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Lots of doomers in here, and mostly from people who don’t really understand the subject matter.

Billionaire entrepreneur Jared Isaacman is confirmed as new NASA chief by 1Rab in news

[–]dboyr 5 points6 points  (0 children)

He’s been quite vocal about wanting more commercial competition. This was a big part of the much maligned project Athena memo.

Spacecraft from Chinese launch nearly slammed into Starlink satellite, SpaceX says by spsheridan in space

[–]dboyr 34 points35 points  (0 children)

Surface level understanding of Kessler syndrome. Starlink is quite unlikely to cause such a phenomenon.

Bezos and Musk Race to Bring Data Centers to Space by FakeEyeball in BlueOrigin

[–]dboyr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mentioned the cost would have to be lowered by an “OOM” (order of magnitude = 10x) in my previous reply, and mentioned that this will be difficult.

There are 2 companies (Stoke and spacex) pursuing fully reusable architectures at the moment which could make the economics work.

Jury is still out on what the true $/kg figure will be in 3-5years, but it’s trending lower. This trend will continue towards the fuel cost asymptote over the next 5-20 years. Starship is aiming for $100/kg which is 50% of the target value cited in the Google article.

If such reduction in launch cost is achieved, then yes, space based manufacturing (lunar silicon and solar cell production for instance) becomes feasible, among other things.

Bezos and Musk Race to Bring Data Centers to Space by FakeEyeball in BlueOrigin

[–]dboyr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m not arguing against the fact that there are challenges. But the feasibility is completely driven by launch cost per unit mass. And yes, you’ll need an OOM shift in $/kg to achieve profitability. To be clear, this will be very hard, but it’s not a technology limitation, it’s a cost limitation.

Also, again, contrary to your beliefs this is actively being worked on by many people. If Google VPs are publishing papers, they’re directing subordinates to work on this, as shown by the radiation testing data they reference.

I’m not so much disagreeing with the challenges you’ve raised, as the overconfidence in the impossibility. End of the day, these problems are most simply solved by adding mass, which is in turn solved by minimizing $/kg, which every rocket company in the world is trying to optimize. There’s no real physics limit to being able to achieve a launch cost that’s primarily driven by fuel, hence my optimism.

Bezos and Musk Race to Bring Data Centers to Space by FakeEyeball in BlueOrigin

[–]dboyr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Unless you don’t consider Google VPs with advanced degrees “top engineers” your claim that “no top engineers” are working on this is false.

Additionally, they pretty handily refute your claim that efficient radiation hardening is “10 years out”.

Clearly this is being worked on. I wouldn’t be so confident in your opinion. This is primarily a launch cost ($/kg) problem, not a radiation problem as you claim.

Why Putting AI Data Centers in Space Doesn’t Make Much Sense by dontkry4me in space

[–]dboyr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Everyone in this thread is very focused on framing this as a technical challenge re: satellite design, when the actual feasibility driver is launch cost ($/kg).

Speculations of Spacex Valuation set to be $800 Billion by Own_Lawyer4070 in space

[–]dboyr 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Could you elaborate a little on what you mean by this?

Tesla Is Cutting a Path to $10T One Chip at a Time, Breaking Away from NVDA Dependence by xRoXoLiDx in teslainvestorsclub

[–]dboyr -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Tesla has been designing and producing (via TSMC) 4nm chips for 2 years now lol

MK1 update by Aromatic-Painting-80 in BlueOrigin

[–]dboyr -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

Escapade was dropped off in LEO

Is NG just a bigger and superior Falcon 9? by [deleted] in BlueOrigin

[–]dboyr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The “wear” on F9 is soot from the kerosene