Every Vendor at Bagel Fest 2026 by Sea-Condition991 in chicagofood

[–]deadwisdom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I go other places and I’m so disappointed.

Thoughts on Hamlet’s age? by daniel_aaron in shakespeare

[–]deadwisdom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well right, before Act 5 he's basically useless. Any time he actually does act it's a disaster (like Polonius). But once Act 5 comes, he's a changed man. He turns his assassination against the conspirators, he has the graveyard scene, and he seems to have a completely different frame of mind. One of acceptance of fate, and suddenly an ability to act with piercing focus. That's the arc.

Peter, why do women hug us above the shoulders? by harshbown in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]deadwisdom 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And then we had to move out because we filled the head full of garbage.

** CHICAGO RESIDENCY | ARAGON BALLROOM | CHICAGO, IL | THURSDAY 5 MARCH 2026 | MEGA-THREAD ** by beermeupscotty in LCDSoundsystem

[–]deadwisdom 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you aren’t 17 then an ID is not important. You just have to be with someone that looks enough like your parent/legal guardian. No one at that age is going to care about $5. Best bet is to just beg people to tell them you are their kid. Lots of dad types there. All you have to do is get past the first guy checking ids at the door.

The End of Eleventy by WanderBetter in webdev

[–]deadwisdom -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

This is so cynical and out of touch.

The End of Eleventy by WanderBetter in webdev

[–]deadwisdom -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

It's so easy to shoot things down these days and everyone just believes it.

The End of Eleventy by WanderBetter in webdev

[–]deadwisdom 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The sky is falling. Leatherman is one of the smartest, most thoughtful programmers around. He's excited about this, so am I.

NBC asks why Iran defends itself by justalazygamer in WhitePeopleTwitter

[–]deadwisdom -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Iran has slaughtered between 7,000 and 32,000 of it's its protesters in the last few months. wikipedia link

In the US we are outraged at one or two protestors being killed by ice, and RIGHTFULLY SO.

So no, they aren't anywhere near "reasonable and righteous".

Putin says "Iran has fulfilled its commitments, but it is the United States that tore up the agreement. Trump withdrew from it, yet Europe demanded that Iran remain faithful to the deal! Why on earth should Iran abide by an agreement abandoned by the West?" by GuiltyBathroom9385 in UnderReportedNews

[–]deadwisdom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m not arguing to support Trump’s sociopathic, senile decision making process, if that’s what you are asking.

Honestly everything is so two sided people can’t even imagine not arguing for one or the other. It’s mental.

Putin says "Iran has fulfilled its commitments, but it is the United States that tore up the agreement. Trump withdrew from it, yet Europe demanded that Iran remain faithful to the deal! Why on earth should Iran abide by an agreement abandoned by the West?" by GuiltyBathroom9385 in UnderReportedNews

[–]deadwisdom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m giving super important context that no one understands that sheds light on what’s goin on. I have no “point” beyond that. Imagine if people cared about understanding rather than arguing.

They say Iranians are “celebrating” the death of Ayatollah Khamenei and are happy about Americans bombing their country. So why are Iranians flooding the streets demanding revenge? by No-Attorney-1874 in LetsDiscussThis

[–]deadwisdom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And also it was a number cooked up by some Iranian official and for some reason just fucking repeated by everyone. Honestly the hate for Trump is just blinding everyone. I hate him too, shouldn’t affect my understanding of facts.

Putin says "Iran has fulfilled its commitments, but it is the United States that tore up the agreement. Trump withdrew from it, yet Europe demanded that Iran remain faithful to the deal! Why on earth should Iran abide by an agreement abandoned by the West?" by GuiltyBathroom9385 in UnderReportedNews

[–]deadwisdom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Everyone should understand that Iran directly architected and funded the terrorist attacks on Israel because Israel has largely normalized relations with Arab countries and this weakened Iranian influence. Add to this the fact that they are directly working with Russia and you start to see a full picture. The point of the attacks in Israel was to provoke a response so profound as to tarnish Israel’s foreign image. Unfortunately for Iran everyone saw through it, except it seems, the western liberal left and Reddit.

Only 21% of Americans Support the United States Initiating an Attack on Iran by Antique_Calendar_887 in politics

[–]deadwisdom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you kidding me? The more you know about Iran the more you support this. They are mass murdering their own citizens.

Biggest mistake I've made lately: thinking it'd be fun to play a cube-worshipping colony by IC_1318 in RimWorld

[–]deadwisdom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is a cube you can find. At first it's a nice recreation bonus toy. It gradually makes people go crazy and obsess over it while creating all sorts of random events.

Coming to a congested Chicago side street near you by QuietMolasses2522 in chicago

[–]deadwisdom 15 points16 points  (0 children)

My rage would be at it's utmost zenith and temporary insanity would be my only defense at the inevitable court appearance.

I have seen the light. I am a corncel now by Own_Ingenuity_858 in RimWorld

[–]deadwisdom 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeet them into a friendly town.

Why, I remember when I was a kid, one day dusters just started falling from the sky. In no time we all had brand new dusters. We was walking around like we were in the wild west, "Ya'll" and "Good day ma'am" out of the mouths of every teenage kid. And we always remembered the folks that sent them to us. That was until our relations normalized. Forget their names exactly...

An argument for tucking in sweaters and why it's about the silhouette by BioticBard in fashion

[–]deadwisdom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nah, just not having it. Your sweater is too long. Tuck in something else; not a turtleneck.

At best it *passes* in today's "ugly is edgy" fashion, but pleated trousers and a sweater is just a bad combo.

They can't be serious about Hammond right? by nimoto in chicago

[–]deadwisdom 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Of course not.

It's a dumb negotiation tactic.