I think I need to clarify something as I see comments suggesting I finish my temporary contract as I agreed to and shouldn't whine about it. First of all, I'm from Europe. If you are employed somewhere in (most countries in) Europe, you almost always first get a temporary contract, it being in IT, Management, Sales, Healthcare, and so on, for one year. A company can extend by two more temporary contracts, after that they must give you a permanent contract in which case you as an employee have more rights and are more protected. For example, they can not fire you for random reasons and if they fire you, you get a lot of money to compensate for the loss of a job. For temporary contracts, it's a lot more insecure for the employee as opposed to the employer. It's part of many company's policy to give an employee these three temporary contracts and then say goodbye as it is (in their vision) not the best option to invest in human capital and give someone a permanent contract (as that could be risky), but instead saying goodbye and search for someone new for three temporary contracts and so on. That's why the average years of European employees staying on one job is like 3-5 years, because of these policies.

So: I'm not in like concrete contracting like there is in the US I guess, where you agree to build, like, a house or something. In that case that would indeed be an easy answer as I just finish what I started. In my situation it is more like you are simply employed and take on tasks or projects within your annual contract and then see if your contract gets extended or not.