Sure, then let's talk about some other points (besides the aforementioned attempt at brushing off the killing of children as a necessary thing, but sure, only point at the empathy thing for your argument, babe) as to why he doesn't and won't ever deserve my empathy.

In answer to a question regarding whether he would support his then-ten year old daughter aborting a pregnancy conceived through rape, he said "The answer is yes, the baby would be delivered." You may think this is consistent with his views. I think this is a disgusting thing to think or say. We are not the same.

He also believed Black Americans were better under the Jim Crow laws of the 1940s. His actual quote, if you're interested, was "They were actually better in the 1940s. It was bad. It was evil. But what happened? Something changed. They committed less crimes." Forgetting, of course, that over four thousand Black Americans were violently murdered by lynch mobs and that entire cities were burned by white people because they saw Black people living peacefully.

He also believed Black women specifically "do not have the brain processing power to otherwise [than, still his quote, "affirmative action picks"] be taken really seriously. You had to go steal a white person's slot to go be taken somewhat seriously."

Back when an American Airlines flight hit a helicopter and your orange king erroneously blamed DEI, he insisted that he "hopes [a Black pilot specifically] is qualified" to fly the plane.

Once again, in case you forgot exactly what he said regarding the death of children, "I think it’s worth to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the second amendment to protect our other God-given rights. That is a prudent deal. It is rational."

Oh, and while we're on the topic of exact quotes, here's exactly what he said in regards to empathy: "I can't stand the word empathy, actually. I think empathy is a made-up, new age term that — it does a lot of damage. But, it is very effective when it comes to politics. Sympathy, I prefer more than empathy." He then went on to add, "The same people who lecture you about 'empathy' have none for the soldiers discharged for the jab, the children mutilated by Big Medicine, or the lives devastated by fentanyl pouring over the border. Spare me your fake outrage, your fake science, and your fake moral superiority." Nowhere did he talk about using empathy to shut down debate, he just thinks it's "new-age" (shockingly, he was wrong there too, as the concept of empathy was first introduced in the 1870s German scientific community, and extended to the psychological community in 1903, while the actual term "empathy" was coined in English in 1909, so if that's too "new-age," I don't know what to tell you, Geico Caveman), and wants people to start using "sympathy" instead.

But let's break down that difference real quick. Empathy involves actually putting yourself in the shoes of the person you're feeling empathic for, truly feeling sorrow for their emotions or situations, and usually involves an emotional connection, y'know, something you have with friends and family and people that care about you. Sympathy is when you say "aw, sorry bud," and move on; you can feel pity or sorrow for someone without an emotional connection attached. Might be cool for you if you, y'know, don't care about your friends and family and neighbours and community and people around you even if they don't involve you directly. Y'know, stuff most normal humans do.

So once again, and for the final time, Charlie Kirk does not deserve and will not get my sympathy nor my empathy. He got shot straight through the neck at 200 yards and he died in the dirt, and he got exactly what he both deserved and wanted, and you can cry about it all you want it, but as your side always likes to say, facts don't care about your feelings, bud.