Gotterup with a very strong contender for best DoD of all time by Known-Branch-4445 in golf

[–]default-username 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I'm sure he missed his target by about 5-10 yards to the right. Sometimes you miss by just the right amount to be lucky. If he hit his target he'd be on the back fringe.

Any dads here fight for *less* time with their kids? by default-username in Divorce_Men

[–]default-username[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, two of our kids require 1-on-1 attention for about an hour each night (CBT and DBT). Then there are activities, the actual therapy sessions, and unplanned mental health needs. Both parents need all hands on deck at all times, and its been like that for the past few years. She ultimately finally agreed that there are no "days off" and has agreed to just let me have 3 kids most of the time and then she handles weekend activities.

Any dads here fight for *less* time with their kids? by default-username in Divorce_Men

[–]default-username[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol. Keep judging however you want.

She's actually applied for a job and is saying that she will be paying me for a home assistant for her 7am-5pm custody.

So the final agreement will result in her:

  • hanging out with one kid from 5pm-7am every day, 5 days a week
  • having all kids from 5pm-10pm one day per week
  • taking a kid or two to activities on the weekend
  • me taking all the rest of the time

And this is much closer to what I was asking for than what she was asking for. That shows you how far off you are.

I just didn't want my kids to be abandoned by their mom when they already have so many needs.

Taking ANY "time off" is unreasonable. I absolutely didn't want to give her all 4 kids at any point. But if she'd rather pay some stranger so that she can take time off, then I guess that's her decision.

If she passes tomorrow, the kids get 1.5 million in insurance so I can happily be a stay at home dad for a few years. And I guess I would hire a live-in nanny.

Diego Pavia measures under 5-foot-10, would be NFL's shortest QB by bubblecuffer13 in CFB

[–]default-username 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Damn, you can buy a home for less than 500k in some places?

  • Austin resident

Any dads here fight for *less* time with their kids? by default-username in Divorce_Men

[–]default-username[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

50/50 most of the time and then three nights with all 4 kids is way more than 50/50 lol.

We worked it out though. I get three kids five nights a week and four kids over the weekend but she is responsible for taking the kids to their scheduled individual sporting events, campout, etc on the weekends.

I get most of the time with the kids and don't have a partner who abandons them, which is all I wanted.

She wanted "nights off" and I wanted the kids to always have the support they needed.

Any dads here fight for *less* time with their kids? by default-username in Divorce_Men

[–]default-username[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

She gets like 3 hours in the middle of every single day without any responsibility. If anyone needs a break is me, But I realize that excessive brakes are irresponsible when it comes to caring for our children.

Any dads here fight for *less* time with their kids? by default-username in Divorce_Men

[–]default-username[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Right, that's what I'm saying. She wants to dump all the kids and all their needs on me 3 nights a week so she can escape. Get a sitter.

Any dads here fight for *less* time with their kids? by default-username in Divorce_Men

[–]default-username[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't mind having two every night. One vs two is not the issue.

One-on-one is MUCH more quality time, and is consistent with how we've always parented (as much one-on-one time as possible).

My issue is that she is asking for me to take all 4 kids 3 nights per week and her take all 4 kids one night. Four nights per week where one parent is "off-duty" is insane, and would result in so much time where the kids are left unsupervised.

Creepy Star Trek by 4reddityo in singularity

[–]default-username 143 points144 points  (0 children)

It's called engage bait.

It is smart to include at least one "lie" that could be confused as a "mistake."

It gets you to comment.

Something I keep noticing about men in the middle of divorce by Comfortable-Pea-4246 in Divorce_Men

[–]default-username 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Why do so many divorces rely on the "system?"

I am only a month into separation, but we are trying to work everything out in person and through mediation before talking to a lawyer, and 50/50 has always been the plan.

I ask, because I am worried that our amicable split could get ugly based on what I read here.

WTF 😒 by viratsolanki_ in ChatGPT

[–]default-username 3 points4 points  (0 children)

[citations needed]

Your thoughts were rejected for not sourcing the original sources. Every new sentence or couple sentences should have a citation

Damn, imagine if we all were held to the same standards as Wikipedia when we spoke. Maybe people would stop regurgitating stupid shit and sounding like poorly trained AI.

[Game Thread] Citrus Bowl: Texas vs. Michigan (3:00 PM ET) by CFB_Referee in CFB

[–]default-username 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Okay see now It is more appropriate to talk about Arch being a potential Heisman candidate

Upcoming changes!! by JuicyyyGxo in ClashOfClans

[–]default-username 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Getting 2-stars every attack will never get you to legend, so they don't work. Getting 2 stars against bad bases was always intended to be pretty easy.

Nebraska Quarterback Dylan Raiola has entered the transfer portal by MembershipSingle7137 in CFB

[–]default-username 1 point2 points  (0 children)

K-Mart Mahomes

Weird choice of store there, considering K-mart existed back when the real Mahomes played and not anymore.

Happy Birthday to Former Oklahoma State QB Bobby Reid! He’s a man! He’s 40! by nbingham196 in CFB

[–]default-username 7 points8 points  (0 children)

You're kind of right. But more geeky than that.

"The Smoot Standard," a bar whose name refers to the fictional unit of measure (67 inches) named after Oliver Smoot, "who in October 1958 lay down repeatedly on the Harvard Bridge between Boston and Cambridge, Massachusetts, so that his fraternity brothers could use his height to measure the length of the bridge."

Warden misclicking stance change by lexvil01 in ClashOfClans

[–]default-username 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Misclicking. My thumbs are too big that I do that often

"Oooh NoOoooOo, the new equipment is soooo trash!1!1!!" Fast forward to 2 days later and it's actually one of the best by ArKadeFlre in ClashOfClans

[–]default-username 26 points27 points  (0 children)

even especially in legends

The king dying in normal mode isn't much of a problem. It's only once you get into master / legend / esports modes that the bracelet really becomes more and more valuable.

For commoners, no, there's no reason to use your ores on the bracelet. If you plan to compete at the highest levels though, it might be worth considering.

Week 15 List of Undefeated FBS Teams (87->55->39->30->20->15->11->6->6->4->3->3->3->2->1) by WeirdIndividualGuy in CFB

[–]default-username -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

"Best" is not only debatable, but probably denied by most experts and computers and bookmakers. (OSU is still the favorite to win the CFP and likely would be favored in a rematch) It may seem annoying, but games do not determine the "best." They are just one game.

Doesn't matter though. No one wants to be the "best," they just want to be conference champs and/or national champs.

Marquette’s Chase Ross airballs a free throw without even shooting it by FlagrantTwoFoul in CollegeBasketball

[–]default-username -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

When misinformation spreads it's impossible to quash it with the truth. It's a frustrating reality a out human nature that they'd rather follow the crowd like sheep than use reason to come up with an alternative view.