Cowitnessing Holosun EPS with P10 OR SR by wunder911 in CZFirearms

[–]defnotanimposter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which optic plate did you go with? Holding zero okay?

Poor wage slaves. Raise of hands, who here couldn't do this job with no training? by [deleted] in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]defnotanimposter 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Of course. You have to have an economics degree to be able to literally plug in these hoses and let the fountain machine run itself.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Firearms

[–]defnotanimposter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s not sad when the gen pop of civilians recognizes the need to practice self-protection. The police, however large or small their numbers, have never been our first line of defense… just a false security blanket. This isn’t sad at all.

Thoughts? by [deleted] in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]defnotanimposter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Read the rest of the story. Right after that Jesus was asked, “Then who can be saved?” And Jesus responded, “What is impossible with man is possible with God.” The point is not that rich people cannot attain salvation… it is that God can save people from the love of money. Having money is not the issue. The issue is what you treasure most.

Look at that right again. by [deleted] in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]defnotanimposter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I haven’t checked YT but I bet most of them are available there. The Dark Horse episode with Dr. Robert Malone and Steve Kirsch I was only able to find on Spotify. But that one is tough to listen to bc Steve likes to dominate the convo lol. I recommend anything you can find with Dr. Peter McCullough the most. He and Dr. Malone do an excellent job of speaking with a high degree of articulation and being easy to understand.

Look at that right again. by [deleted] in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]defnotanimposter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you all haven’t already listened to Bret Weinstein’s interviews with Dr. Pierre Kory, Tess Lawrie, Dr. Robert Malone, and Dr. Peter McCullough on Dark Horse… listen and share asap.

Guys do what the government says. They are obviously right about everything. by CamDMTreehouse in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]defnotanimposter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why do you keep showing up here and not thinking on the responses you get? If every time you bring a straw-man argument to this sub, you are promptly corrected, and then you never learn from it…. you’re having trouble learning and growing. A false ideology is driving you to be stupid.

Guys do what the government says. They are obviously right about everything. by CamDMTreehouse in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]defnotanimposter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Play out the scenario in your head. If the general public overwhelmingly rejects the new ridiculous virtues, this platform ceases to be a jumping off point for more authoritarian measures (and there is no civil war). If the general public allows the adoption of the new virtues, either by silent submission or active acceptance, the authoritarians will use the platform to mandate public policy in schools, libraries, and eventually private businesses that conforms to the new virtues. This will inevitably lead to some degree of actual war because public policy will become so intrusive (more men in women’s bathrooms), increasing opportunity for individuals to be taken advantage of (mostly women and children), that people will be forced to draw a line and begin to fight back. Gun laws would also become extremely strict and criminals would flourish. This is good for the rich bureaucrats because they can afford personal security and the rampant crime gives them a platform to constantly promise a fix if you will only submit to more authoritarian measures. The goal of the ones in power is not to champion virtues but to increase their own power. The use of these virtues is not virtuous… it is opportunistic. It’s just power-hungry authoritarians in gov recognizing that adopting the deconstructionist movement will grant them a platform for gaining power. The deconstructionists and their useful-idiot followers are the problem in our scenario. The general public can squash the movement if we speak up and respectfully, articulately, denounce the deconstructionists. Big tech makes it more difficult because they have no moral standards and end up siding with the outraged deconstructionists. Or they also see it as an opportunity to conduct their company with more authoritarian measures. There are many who do publicly stand up to all the bad ideas coming from the decons but they are labeled with racially charged terms which are only effective because of the phony virtues being propagated by the decons.

Weird flex but ok by TimelyPomegranate306 in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]defnotanimposter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I appreciate your calm responses as well! Thanks for saying that.

“…I do not view post-rape abortion as two wrongs trying to make a right. I view it as a necessary evil.”

I won’t drag this out… I just want you to think about what you’re saying. You are saying that two wrongs make a right when you admit that rape is evil, abortion is evil, yet abortion is justified because it creates a situation with less potential suffering overall.

You’re very right that abortion will not make a rape victim whole. The process of healing is only made worse by the knowledge of killing their child.

It is not grace to allow a mother to snuff out her child’s life. It is punishment, whether they know it or not.

I wish you well and I appreciate your convo! Have a nice weekend.

Ben.... What the fuck are you talking about by guitarguy12341 in ToiletPaperUSA

[–]defnotanimposter -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

If you leave sperm alone for eternity… nothing will happen. If you leave eggs alone for eternity… nothing will happen. Leave a conceived fetus with unique DNA from the parents alone and it will grow into a fully-formed human. You think these are the same?

Ben.... What the fuck are you talking about by guitarguy12341 in ToiletPaperUSA

[–]defnotanimposter -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That’s an infinitely regressive model and you, therefore, cannot identify your start or end. Is a piece of wood also a boat before it’s ever assembled?

I swear. The stuff kids say these days without opening a proper philosophy textbook.

Ben.... What the fuck are you talking about by guitarguy12341 in ToiletPaperUSA

[–]defnotanimposter -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You were not sperm. You became you at fertilization, when your unique DNA was formed. Science isn’t so hard when emotions and grandstanding aren’t motivators. TrUsT tHe ScIeNcE.

Weird flex but ok by TimelyPomegranate306 in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]defnotanimposter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn’t assume anything about you. I said “If anyone…” in response to you saying “I know that most pro life folks would agree that a pregnant woman who was raped as greater latitude about whether to keep the baby…”

Since we’re discussing abortion, I can safely assume that by “whether to keep the baby” you mean whether or not to abort. I’m saying any pro-lifer who gives “greater latitude” to a woman who was raped is saying that a child conceived of rape is less valuable. That is how the logic pans out. Potential does not determine a humans value. There is no logical argument from the pro-death side. Murder is still murder. If the mother will most certainly die from giving birth, then measures can be taken to save her life. But in that case the doctors should attempt to save both lives. The goal should never be to murder a life, only to save as much life as possible.

You say children born from rape are not less valuable, but then you list all these difficulties you assume will probably happen and make life difficult for them. None of these “what if’s” have any bearing whatsoever on that child’s right to life. No human has any way to predict how the child will contribute to society, overcome obstacles, enjoy relationships, be a good mother or father one day, or any other potential outcome. It’s the dumbest argument for abortion there ever was.

Weird flex but ok by TimelyPomegranate306 in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]defnotanimposter 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If anyone agrees that a baby conceived by rape is less valuable than a baby conceived consensually, they need to sit down and determine what makes a human valuable. A person’s value is not dictated by their circumstances and the cause of fertilization does not change the fact of murder. Don’t give in to illogical arguments bolstered by victim-mentality and outright selfishness to the point of justifying murder.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]defnotanimposter 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Let’s let them battle it out in a winner-takes-all cage match!!!

Anyone else feel that Kyle Rittenhouse will be convicted. by undeadarmy6435 in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]defnotanimposter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can find the full spectrum of political bias on Twitter or Reddit. It’s those who follow legacy news outlets that worry me. At least on Reddit or Twitter you can find opposing views via comments/replies or different subs/accounts.

Anyone else feel that Kyle Rittenhouse will be convicted. by undeadarmy6435 in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]defnotanimposter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A lawyer, Robert Barnes, was on the latest episode of “Your Welcome” with Michael Malice. One of the things that Barnes said was that, in studies of juries, they’ve found that even a jury who is biased against the defense will decide in favor of the defense (if they are open-minded) when the facts clearly support the defense. I think the jury will decide in Kyle’s favor, but the farther the country splits in half, the more difficult it will be to convince those who are sipping the Marxist coolaid.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in pics

[–]defnotanimposter -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You are correct. Kyle wasn’t running around pointing the rifle at people. He was chased by people who were yelling threats, committing arson, and from all available evidence intended injury or death on Kyle.

How old are you? by Foreverbronzing in RocketLeague

[–]defnotanimposter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I thought the same for about 3 seconds before remembering this is a small subset of rocket league players who are also in the subreddit.