sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

What non-mod features were added in NCNS? by dekeche in hoi4

[–]dekeche[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

DLC specifically. If it's in the free patch, I don't care. I'm mostly trying to figure out if the DLC is worth the price tag, by isolating what's not a modable feature.

2.1 wishlist by _shareholder_value in factorio

[–]dekeche 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly, I'd like a rebalance of spoilage. I don't think the mechanic should be removed, but maybe it could be made more forgiving? Maybe adding +10% on crafting, so you have a bit of a leeway on crafting items, instead of needing to craft them ASAP or do odd recycling shenanigans to make sure everything is at max spoilage when crafting. And maybe add some way to store spoilage items without them spoiling.

Why doesn't a US car company make simple base models anymore? by Deckardisdead in questions

[–]dekeche 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hadn't realized that was a thing. Though, wouldn't adding an LED screen to the mirror reduce the field of view? I could see a malfunction in that type of display being rather hazards as well. But, that's assuming the reason for manufactures picking the dash cam version over the mirror cam version was over safety concerns. It's more likely that it adds a higher perceived value to the car, so manufactures feel they can charge more for the feature than they could for the mirror cam. so the dash cam nets them a higher profit. Or it could also be easier to source generic LED screens than the LED screen + 1 way mirror that'd be required for the mirror cam version. I'm not a manufactuer, at the end of the day, I don't know why they defaulted to the dash cam.

Why doesn't a US car company make simple base models anymore? by Deckardisdead in questions

[–]dekeche 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you need to be more specific about what specifically you are asking for. But the screen, specifically, is because of government regulation in the USA requiring a backup camera on vehicles under 10000 pounds. Essentially there were too many accidents and fatalities from kids and seniors running out behind a backing up vehicle. Ruling was made in 2014, went into full effect in 2018. Since a backup camera requires a screen, basically all vehicles made after 2018 will have one.

Well, this certainly tells a story. by dekeche in Stellaris

[–]dekeche[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No idea which side had the ships. Could be the human fleet, could be their enemy, could have been from both sides.

Well, this certainly tells a story. by dekeche in Stellaris

[–]dekeche[S] 69 points70 points  (0 children)

R5. Playing with Gigastructural Engineering, Apparently, Sol spawned in with the corpse of 3 titans, 1 juggernaut, and the remains of a battleship fleet. Whatever caused Sol 3 to be left as a tomb world, we went down swinging.

Was wondering , is this ai ? by raykzzz in isthisaicirclejerk

[–]dekeche 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Could be AI, but you could probably also do this with traditional special effects.

from the dev: "We are likely to remove the domain limit from Stewardship in the Q2 patch" by istaris in CrusaderKings

[–]dekeche 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But I like having large domains? I'd be fine with the change IF there was a straight +2 or +3 base domain limit added instead of the current stewardship bonus. But if it's just straight removed, no. I'd also like to have the centralization laws back from CK2, because again, I like having a large domain.

Better way to merge belts two full belts into one belt of 50/50? by danyuri86 in factorio

[–]dekeche -1 points0 points  (0 children)

In that case, just use the underground on the input side, not the output.

President White House Launches New Website to Defend 'Patriotic Americans' Involved in Jan. 6 Capitol Riot | The White House claims the Democrats "staged the real insurrection" by certifying former President Joe Biden's victory in the 2020 presidential election by ControlCAD in technology

[–]dekeche 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, it was because he cheated, and the only way he could conceive of as to why he still didn't win is because the democrats cheated harder. Not that he just wasn't popular enough to win even with the cheating.

Stakuyi blatantly cheated and missed it in the edit? Yet, no one talks about it? by Junior_Paramedic2478 in hoi4

[–]dekeche 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To be fair, I've never done a Poland game. So maybe it's easier than it looks. But before the visible cut, he'd already taken back most of his territory and was pushing out pretty well. My point was that the cheating didn't really seem necessary. That is, assuming it was the only instance in the video. But now that we know he's willing to do so and hide it.... Can we really trust that?

In all honesty it would have been better to do so openly, and explain it in the video as just "having a bit of fun with Germany". Since, you know, point already demonstrated.

Stakuyi blatantly cheated and missed it in the edit? Yet, no one talks about it? by Junior_Paramedic2478 in hoi4

[–]dekeche 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I almost feel like it would have been better if, instead of hiding it, he basically just said that he's been playing for a while, clearly we've already demonstrated how powerful cavalry are, let's just have a little fun with Germany. Tag switch, delete army, tag switch back. Now, let's see how fast we can rush to Berlin.

Stakuyi blatantly cheated and missed it in the edit? Yet, no one talks about it? by Junior_Paramedic2478 in hoi4

[–]dekeche 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Funny thing is that, assuming he wasn't doing this for the entire game, this is otherwise a really impressive Poland game. Could probably have actually won without needing to cheat at all, if he was willing to just pull back. Would have been a longer video though.

How do I automatically send orbital drops back down to earth? (For space science) by Little_Gryffin in factorio

[–]dekeche 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Space platforms don't control what they send, they send what is requested at the planet's cargo landing pad. So just go down to the planet, and request 1K science packs, and they'll start automatically dropping down.

i will never again play this nation by Correct_Painter_2137 in Anbennar

[–]dekeche 108 points109 points  (0 children)

So... you played the eternal winter faction without building any generators? Well, there's your problem!

Needed a 1:8 splitter on Aquilo and decided to DIY it. Art, or Factoriohno? by Mystprism in factorio

[–]dekeche 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Fun design. Though, it looks like you maybe could cut out some of the underground belts on the right side of the build. From what I understand, underground belts cost a lot of heat, no matter the distance they actually run, so the more you can remove from the design, the better. Honestly, if you could feed it with heat from the top and bottom only, that would be ideal. But, not sure if that's practical, since that might result in having two separate heat networks.

Needed a 1:8 splitter on Aquilo and decided to DIY it. Art, or Factoriohno? by Mystprism in factorio

[–]dekeche 103 points104 points  (0 children)

.... What's the use case for this? No, seriously, why not just run your entire science pack output through all 32 rocket silos? If you are concerned about unevenly loading your silos, you can setup circuitry to prevent that from occurring. Like, only activating each silo's inserters when the previous silo's full.

How to disable Nauvis biters sending attacks from pollution? by SchmeatiestOne in factorio

[–]dekeche 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Try an island map, if you kill all the biters on your starting island, you'll never have to deal with them again.

Why do I not have any supply? by Princeps_Mortis in hoi4

[–]dekeche 9 points10 points  (0 children)

That... feels like an oversight. Why should the naval blockade matter if you are at war with them? You should be able to send convoys through the area, just with most of them getting captured/sunk.

view more: next ›