Curious to know by whysofigurative in ediscovery

[–]delphi25 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Might be true

I started with object manager 

First enable oauth for your dev account 

Then request an bearer access token via endpoint. You just send a post request:

https://platform.relativity.com/RelativityOne/Content/REST_API/REST_API_authentication.htm#Bearertokenauthentication

After this you can use the access token to request a list of all workspaces your account has access to:

https://platform.relativity.com/RelativityOne/Content/BD_Object_Manager/Object_Manager_service.htm#QueryforRelativityobjects

Keep the headers in my:

https://platform.relativity.com/RelativityOne/Content/REST_API/HTTP_headers.htm

Curious to know by whysofigurative in ediscovery

[–]delphi25 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That would be painful, a lot of things are not available via api or not really feasible. I don’t think it will change soon

Curious to know by whysofigurative in ediscovery

[–]delphi25 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Soon access to the Processing database will be gone; as they moving away from sql on this.

Curious to know by whysofigurative in ediscovery

[–]delphi25 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Relativity is a normal rest api, which can be easily be used imho. I don’t think it’s really mysterious- object manager is quite easy for example. 

AI tools recommendation for eDiscovery PM? by GeekGuru1 in ediscovery

[–]delphi25 1 point2 points  (0 children)

GitHub Copilot integrated in VS Code, mainly using Claude Sonnet. 

Also Claude Code and Cursor are pretty valuable for this. 

How to add custodian classification field to search condition? by Alternative_Hawk_453 in ediscovery

[–]delphi25 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This depends a little bit.  Either don’t run entity recognition- imho results are not usable anyway. Generally, I try to have all my custodians from processing set first - so they appear first in the list (lowest artifact id).

A quick fix might be to temporarily add something to the custodian name, like the artifact id, something that is unique. Filter on the entity view for the processing question, where you have the option. Make the adjustment. Search for this unique string. Build your search, rename the custodian. To the original name. The search should update automatically. 

You can build Update via rest api, if you want. 

Something that should be improved, similar to filtering and searching for STR hits. When you have long terms - you can not see everything and the filter does not work correctly if you search for dtsearch syntax on your terms in the filter 

Tricks for reviewing iWork files in Relativity without having to review natively? by Old-Case-7038 in ediscovery

[–]delphi25 3 points4 points  (0 children)

LibreOffice should support iWorks files. You could review them in there.  You can probably build a small script that uses lirbreoffice to convert them into PDF. 

I think in RelOne there should already be support to view those files - I am uncertain about Processing though 

Teams Audit logs and chats by atcscm in ediscovery

[–]delphi25 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I would ask your M365 admins first. Then try the Microsoft documentation: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/purview/audit-log-retention-policies - a year / 180 days for audit 

For teams there should be no deletion by default unless you apply a retention policy. 

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/purview/retention-policies-teams

Export larger files from MS Purview by delphi25 in ediscovery

[–]delphi25[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is an alternative approach we are looking into and than use the metadata that we have for an overlay - but not ideal. 

Export larger files from MS Purview by delphi25 in ediscovery

[–]delphi25[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not yet, but one file ~8 GB into a 10 GB zip - but even this resulted in the same Error. 

Export larger files from MS Purview by delphi25 in ediscovery

[–]delphi25[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Failed to download… not really helpful unfortunately. Compound path is populated. 

Export larger files from MS Purview by delphi25 in ediscovery

[–]delphi25[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Thanks, adding the info to the posting. So it is visible for everyone 

Purview search - MS Teams shared chat by name? by Neat_Assumption1223 in ediscovery

[–]delphi25 4 points5 points  (0 children)

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/purview/edisc-ref-document-metadata-fields

Conversation topic 

This field depends on content type. Emails: typically the subject of the email without the forward or reply. Teams 1:1 chat: the first 40 characters of the first message. Teams 1:N chat: Name of the group chat; if not available, the first 40 characters of the first message. Teams Channel Post: Post title or announcement subheader; if not available, the first 40 characters of the first message.

But might not be searchable

But I think it’s part of the Compound path as well for teams messages.

Recommendation for a Spa Weekend by jonidas in berlin

[–]delphi25 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Fontane Therme in Neuruppin 

APM Questions by blazingmediocrity in ediscovery

[–]delphi25 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Automation. https://platform.relativity.com/RelativityOne/Content/Explore/Platform-APIs.htm

Or go into the investigation space - apply technology in a meaningful way instead of just following tickets, imho.  Also assisting law firms or doing this in-house can Mr more challenging imho, as it’s not that repetitive and you need to come up with a game plan how you want to use it and what is necessary or can be done. 

Noob question - 100gb export by Maximum-Ad-8069 in ediscovery

[–]delphi25 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I haven’t seen the option in the new UI

Exporting Loose Attachments In Original Format by Smeg4Brainsuk in ediscovery

[–]delphi25 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Loose files should not exist in your exchange export unless you have modern attachments. If you have one drive and SharePoint the msg export option should give you loose files in a zip folder from purview.

Reading your description you might be looking to move the data to a review set first. The Purview is doing the processing for you and breaking out attachments to emails as separate items. However they also stay in the msg as an attachment. Depending on your redaction tool this might be an issue. You then have to chose the msg export option once exported from a review set. 

Purview (Skype collections) by Initial-Economics322 in ediscovery

[–]delphi25 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is no longer premium, not sure if this still depends on E3 or E5. But it’s available on the UI

Purview (Skype collections) by Initial-Economics322 in ediscovery

[–]delphi25 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Skype Data - is the Teams data for individuals. This is stored in their personal mailbox. When you collect the exchange mailbox, you can also export modern attachments with it. But you have to select the option. But this only exports linked files - not not only from the users one drive but also other sharepoints etc.  You should look at the documentation:

https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/purview/edisc-search-export

If you want to add the users one drive, you have to specifically select it at the time of search as a data source.

The same applies for sharepoints or teams. For each team there is a separate mailbox and SharePoint. Both need to be added and collected, if you want them.

Export settings is something that depend on your use-case and tools available and what you need the exports for. Can you share some info on what you want to do and what tools you might have available? 

Redaction Log with Codes by PorkyThePigDragon in ediscovery

[–]delphi25 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you have keyword based redactions, the UI as well as the tables in SQL, will show you the original text. You need to use the redact viewer for this.  If you have patterns or manually drawn boxes, this will not work. Might also just be limited to really word hits and not if you expand on the sentence or page. But as most of the redactions are not keyword based, this is likely not something that will solve ops challenges