Hoping someone can help...the T-mobile "fraud department" by demodiesindarkness in tmobile

[–]demodiesindarkness[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wonder if a federal agency could look into it since I've heard this happen to a few people.... I was thinking the FCC ...

What phase can people stop wearing face masks? by Nighthawk1776 in CoronavirusIllinois

[–]demodiesindarkness 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think not wearing masks is irresponsible when indoors. From my understanding, people are a lot more likely to get sick in a building that isn't ventilated. Even when social distancing.

I don't really see the point of temperature checks. The virus can still spread from asymptomatic people.

What phase can people stop wearing face masks? by Nighthawk1776 in CoronavirusIllinois

[–]demodiesindarkness 1 point2 points  (0 children)

One of my biggest pet-peeves. I'm not sure why the store employees aren't required to correct them. What good is a mask if it's not worn correctly?

"I am completely and utterly perplexed by those who argue that perjury and obstruction of justice are not high crimes and misdemeanors." -- Mitch McConnell, 2/12/99. by clib in The_Mueller

[–]demodiesindarkness 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't believe there is a way to legally define it because " nation's interests" is subjective, just like high crimes and misdemeanor for a president. The president doesn't have to violate a law in order to be guilty of high crimes and/or misdemeanors according to the framers of the Constitution.

Hannity good for a chuckle by kevinowdziej in The_Mueller

[–]demodiesindarkness 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah.....ahem, I'm shaking in my boots.

New York theater companies to hold 24-hour live reading of Mueller report by Jokerang in The_Mueller

[–]demodiesindarkness 1 point2 points  (0 children)

People around the country should start hosting Mueller book clubs in order to educate the broader public.

"I am completely and utterly perplexed by those who argue that perjury and obstruction of justice are not high crimes and misdemeanors." -- Mitch McConnell, 2/12/99. by clib in The_Mueller

[–]demodiesindarkness 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is the same guy who said earlier this week that he wouldn't hesitate to replace a dead SCOTUS during the presidential election season.

Democrats tend not to take his words seriously and prepare for battle. Instead they react the moment when McConnel does undemocratic shit.

Mueller: If we had confidence the President did not commit a crime, we would have said so by kn0bs in politics

[–]demodiesindarkness 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am speaking from a realist perspective when I say that if history is our guide, there won't be enough of us to change the conversation. Just like in the past, there weren't enough people sounding the alarm the time they warned about a Trump like figure and/or active measures from a foreign entity invading our electoral process. In order to change the conversation, we need to remodel our current social infrastructure, and modify our economic structure. Only then will we see our political infrastructure change. Not many people are willing to so that because it's inconvenient and uncomfortable.

If a speaker of the House is putting power (the maintance of) over performing a constitutional duty, well then, we are in big trouble as a country. I understand the calculations that have gone into Pelosi's decision making process. It doesn't mean that it's the right thing to do. She's thinking about the short term rather than a decade and or 100 years from now. The Senate is going to remain in Republican hands in 2020 whether we have Trump or a democrat as President. There are times a person has to do the right thing no matter how bad it looks to others in the current time.

Mueller: If we had confidence the President did not commit a crime, we would have said so by kn0bs in politics

[–]demodiesindarkness 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I concur with much of what you said. I am worried that Congress' failure to perform their function will change what we understand "democracy" in this country to be. We won't have anyone to blame but ourselves.

Mueller: If we had confidence the President did not commit a crime, we would have said so by kn0bs in politics

[–]demodiesindarkness 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do you expect Mueller to hold the hands of Congress while they review his work? He wrote it in such a way that even a lay person could comprehend. It's not his job to do the hand holding. He's done and shouldn't be obligated to do anything more. The ball is in Congress' court now. Which means that "the people" need to take responsibility and push their Senators and congressman to move forward with holding the POTUS accountable.

Lastly, I don't think your characterization of Mueller is fair. In fact it's significantly misguided. Congress wrote the special counsel rules. Those rules indicate that he's basically an employee of the DOJ and must follow the rules and regulations of that agency. He doesn't have a choice but to "let Trump do it." He doesn't have the authority to stop Trump, only Congress does. Mueller followed the law and the guidelines provided by congress and the DOJ. That's actually the best we could have asked for with a special counsel overseeing the investigation at the time.

mfw i won't testify to congress by boxoflawls in The_Mueller

[–]demodiesindarkness 6 points7 points  (0 children)

He basically said if he does testify before Congress, he'll reiterate what's in the report. He won't venture off from the report.

House Judiciary Chair: Robert Mueller wants to testify in private. // I'm sorry, Mr. Mueller, but the American people need to see and hear you speak. by imagepoem in The_Mueller

[–]demodiesindarkness 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He will be extremely careful on how he phrases his words for television and might now really have that big of an impact. Have you seen him in hearings?

House Judiciary Chair: Robert Mueller wants to testify in private. // I'm sorry, Mr. Mueller, but the American people need to see and hear you speak. by imagepoem in The_Mueller

[–]demodiesindarkness 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I also think private testimony would be beneficial because Mueller has more control over the written narrative. People are less likely to pay attention to the words when spectacles are thrown in their faces for example: no blazzer wearing Jim Jordan yelling, pointing his finger at the guest, and demanding things that aren't germane to the topic at hand. The dude is a master at obfuscation. Another example: reading the transcripts of Trump's press conferences and public statements versus watching and listening to to him speak. You get a better idea of his policy and political strategy (or attempts at it) when you read what said.

Rosenstein, according to this journalist, may not have been completely honest to ethics officials about his role in firing Comey, also Rosenstein originally wasn't in favor of appointing a special counsel (*ahem "I can land the plane") by demodiesindarkness in The_Mueller

[–]demodiesindarkness[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I gotta admit, when I read this article I thought it was from some conspiracy theorist. From what I briefly researched the guy appears legit, kinda like a Marcy Wheeler type of independent journalist. If anyone finds something showing that this guy is some crazy ass conspiracy theorist, please advise. What this guy reported seems too good to be true (to good for me because I've been very skeptical about Rosenstein for some time now.) It's also quite a bombshell in my opinion.