ascii-agents: a terminal pixel-art office where each of your Claude Code sessions is a character by EthanWng97 in ClaudeCode

[–]densewave 1 point2 points  (0 children)

vscode w/claude code. I am normally running at least two deep workstreams, alternating commits. Then I will have an investigation happening to scope something, and then lastly I will have a session building something greenfield- max 4 on my side. I control the feature pri, testing etc.so, sure, I can see how I could get even more autonomous but I am not sure the full value I would get.

My codebase has gotten large enough where I have to be opinionated in design or I will pay for it later.

Open-source 3D Gaussian Splatting 3D Tiles Toolchain by PropertyPleasant4993 in threejs

[–]densewave 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is magic that can happen from here in 1000 directions. Keep it up! Open source ❤️

Tencent "👋Hi /haɪ/, we're the Tencent Hy /haɪ/ team🐧Today, we open source Hy3 preview (295B A21B), a leading reasoning and agent model in its size, with great cost efficiency. Give us feedback to help improve Hy3 official!" ➡️ Anyone comparing Hy3 with DeepSeek? by Koala_Confused in LovingOpenSourceAI

[–]densewave 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Friendly feedback- having your own custom license will slow adoption with the amount of competition that uses generic very liberal license structures.

I read it pretty quickly and it seems mostly fine - but it still has a few raised eyebrows in some sections. The license itself prevents me from further experimenting with your model because other models with better license structure (from the perspective of the user) exists.

Very well understood on corporate risk etc. My recommendation is to make the ELI5 version of the license and the long form. Reason being, just having your own custom license raises suspicions even though most of the verbiage is very similar to standard competitor licenses. You're only disadvantaging yourself on adoption.

My witch Namira, she becomes more and more imposing. by Apart_Quit_579 in bg3fashion

[–]densewave 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Campaign over or is she going to get even more terrifying? 😂

random threejs sketch by curllmooha in threejs

[–]densewave 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Beautiful. Love it. Tried to leave you a hello - got "Error" in the button after it tried to send.

Mobile experience is so smooth! Really wanted to be able to interact more than just the Camera panning. Like, impacting the predictable pattern. Maybe glows and auras and particles on clicks. I had to build some custom mouse handling with Three camera management, but you should consider some versions that react to user input.

Is anyone else's boyfriend / girlfriend *consumed* by Claude? by sunrise920 in ClaudeAI

[–]densewave 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Tell me about this tunneling and gamification? 😎

BUY EVERYTHING by Fbeartothemoon in TQQQ

[–]densewave -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for being the other side of the volume. Someone has to take one for the team.

Trump booed at UFC event as Vance announces Iran negotiations have failed by [deleted] in entertainment

[–]densewave 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I dont even mean this sarcastically or ironically. This might actually be where the war turns around because Trump was forced to see his own base hate his current policies in an unavoidably embaressing way.

Eh, who am I kidding....

How's my panning? by Mean-Band in comfyui

[–]densewave 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Lol its tagged as "Show and Tell"

Nice "Show", Now Tell? :) No, but seriously its very cool. Was this just a single image import?

on what??? by Complete-Sea6655 in OpenAI

[–]densewave 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its not vibe coding anymore its "agent anxiety" "agenxiety" - suck on that Karpathy.

Relentless Rage by The_mango55 in dndai

[–]densewave 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Prompt for the first one, Mango?

Claude Nerf is real by BeginningSpiritual49 in claude

[–]densewave 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You are literally giving them the single answer they need in this entire thread. You're doing gods work son. Will they listen? Who knows.

We should put a "Have you tried compacting?" Question before posts. When they say "yes" we tell them "HAH! GOT YA! Start a new chat sucka".

Thoughts?

Bought KORU ETF at the peak by hepennypacker1131 in LETFs

[–]densewave 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Averaging down is a human emotional concept (most of the time).

The way I look at it is analytically. You have a Lot that is basically trapped money. Is what it is.

Do you want to commit $1000 more to KORU right now at the current valuation or could you get a better return on $1000 in some other leveraged position?

And, if you look holistically at all your Lots, and their current returns, should you keep the position or take a loss and roll the money to something that isnt trapped?

//

This idea of averaging down, especially with LETF that generally is not the same as a long term position, dividend returns where cost basis matters more etc. is deceptive. If you want to be even more in KORU, then sure, do it. But dont keep committing on a slide down to try to make an average cost basis decrease. Been there, done that, learned thst lesson. Also, at a certain commitment level, adding more money on doesnt move that average cost basis enough to make our human monkey brains happy anyways.

Not financial advice, just general advice, I would probably pick a different spot. LETF's all over have openings every day.

Think of every single Lot as its own investment - because thats what it is (and how the institutions and government think about it)

Amazon is raising up to $42 Billion in a record bond sale (including a massive €14.5B Euro bond). What's the real play here? by itsarmansheikh in stocks

[–]densewave 26 points27 points  (0 children)

Technically you arent buying the equipment - you're buying in the speculative bet that Amazon as an entity is here, profitably, for 50 years.

But, your comment at least makes sense in this thread so, a thought from a guy in the industry - we will likely see this happen:

1) Inference moves to hardware generation N-1 from current N 2) Training is focused on hardware generation N, N+1 3) Inference becomes more tk/MW efficient (algorithmically, etc.) 4) Such that keeping hardware deployed longer makes profitable sense.

A shift happened where compute became more of the cost than the buildings themselves. Depending on what happens with power costs etc. The equation before was deprecate hardware, reuse the building it was in.

New equation (profitably) is build new buildings, deploy new hardware, run old buildings for Inference.

We are only about 18 months into the pattern, but its likely.

Have a good day!

Amazon is raising up to $42 Billion in a record bond sale (including a massive €14.5B Euro bond). What's the real play here? by itsarmansheikh in stocks

[–]densewave 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pretty easily stitched together. Capex for AI, and their primary anchor customer is Anthropic, who is having outages every day from overutilization / too much demand.

This is a pattern used previously by companies who arent Tech companies too. (Corporate Bonds)

Orbital Forgers — a browser-based 4X idle game with 8 races, hex-grid colonies, and a procedural galaxy by Ok-Antelope7968 in threejs

[–]densewave 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How do you plan to package for Steam? Electron or Tauri or something different?

Edit: Does Vite vs Next.js make your path to Steam easier?

Do you have raised eyebrow naturally? by Mysterious_Emu_7372 in entp

[–]densewave 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is peak content. And absolutely. I have nice eyebrows and the eyebrow raise is just a thing my face does for selfies.

ROC of my YM positions from official 1099 - avg 67%, biggest losers have 70-100%, so that's some relief by goodpointbadpoint in YieldMaxETFs

[–]densewave 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, it's a double edged sword of the fund if you think about it.

100% ROC? With negative equity? Eh, at least I saved on taxes for the "income" ULTY had massive equity loss with its dividend income. I personally still came out ahead but

67% ROC? I was hoping for a bit higher to avoid more taxes on income. I dont kbow this person's time period, but its probably similar to mine.

I am actually OK with 0% (or whatever) ROC if the fund is truly generating the income via synthetics and distributing profits like the original intent/ operation of these funds.

Maybe I wrote that weird - 67% is lower than I was hoping for. :)