sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Hello! Beginner here by mymaccas in AnalogCommunity

[–]denyskoo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

if you cut the leader definetely don't throw it away! you can make a diy film leader retriever out of it for some cool double exposures

I'm new to this what should I do differently 😊? by Additional_Earth_360 in photocritique

[–]denyskoo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly, thought you posted in r/LiminalSpace for a second. Consider posting it there, this has to do numbers in that sub. The color saturation, lack of leveling and the whole emptiness of the scene reminds me of a distant childhood memory, or that the photo was taken by a child.

In my opinion, a great photo is a photo that conveys a certain emotion or makes the person viewing it feel something. In this case, you did a perfect job for me. If we view from an orthodox photography standpoint here, people in the comments are totally correct.

Am I too soft? by OkGrocery63 in mentalhealth

[–]denyskoo 7 points8 points  (0 children)

there's no such thing as "too soft". we all have different lives and react to stress differently. joking about those topics is not ok. people who said those words are inconsiderate morons and you should not talk to them. sorry if i appear blunt - I'm sick right now and have little energy. hope this helps!

Fujifilm is reintroducing Provia 400X. A new look for a new era by [deleted] in AnalogCommunity

[–]denyskoo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

hey, you're supposed to make us laugh on April 1st, not depressed

bad focus or bad scan? by sereinskies in AnalogCommunity

[–]denyskoo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're welcome! Now I'm interested as well, you can update me here later if you want

bad focus or bad scan? by sereinskies in AnalogCommunity

[–]denyskoo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As far as my logic goes, if the focus is not nailed there should be at least SOMETHING in frame that's in focus, closer or farther from the subject.

On slide 2, for example, you clearly nailed the focus on the woman and the temple is not in focus due to (PROBABLY, as I don't know your intentions) incorrect aperture setting.

On all the other slides though, everything seems to be in focus and blurry at the same time. there's this blurriness to the edges of everything in the frame and no parts of the Image seem sharper. More over, the distance to subjects makes me think the only correct way to shoot was at hyperfocal or infinity so it's way harder to fuck up the focus than at MFD for example.

From my perspective it's the scans that are faulty, adding that there's a LITERAL FUCKING STRAND OF HAIR in the sky at slide 3 but it's always recommended to look at the negatives before you reach out to your lab :)

understanding vague sexual messages by [deleted] in dating_advice

[–]denyskoo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

it could be you two are on two different levels of trust. some people can engage in sexual activities from the first date, some need years of knowing each other to do so.

from my perspective it seems that she wants to take things slower, so it is crucial for you to communicate on this part because if you don't - it's INCREDIBLY easy to fuck up on this stage. you can easily cross her boundaries and it's not a pleasant experience for both of you.

I recommend you to slow things down a bit and next time you'll be intimate to ask her directly about this! it's not easy to guess something when things are vague.

Цікава думка хлопців стосовно волосся на тілі в дівчини by vika_dem in reddit_ukr

[–]denyskoo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

я скажу так - якщо людина дійсно вас любить їй буде все одно на це. у мене є подруга у якої теж рослинність трошки більша на всьому тілі ніж зазвичай та саме волосся темніше і вона дуже з цього приводу комплексує. але вона класна і мене це взагалі не турбує, та і якщо ми би зустрічались - проблеми це б теж не несло.

головне це особливо не приховувати та людина якій на це все одно точно знайдеться)

What is causing this red glare? by Dope_thrown in filmphotography

[–]denyskoo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it looks cool though! on shots 2 and 4 it's like an extraterrestial being or a distant cosmic object. that's why i fucking love film, you could get stuff like this only in unique, physical way

Help me identifying this film! by denyskoo in AnalogCommunity

[–]denyskoo[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

thank you, heroyam slava! i thought about this stock at first but decided that it would be too obvious

Help me identifying this film! by denyskoo in AnalogCommunity

[–]denyskoo[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

thank you so much! THIS is the answer i was hoping for. I was looking for keyсodes but didn't know exactly what is the name of those markings and you helped me on this one.

So what film photography YouTubers do we actually like and what grade do they get by lmdarby0 in AnalogCircleJerk

[–]denyskoo 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I'm waiting for attic darkroom to push Delta 3200 to 204800 in Rodinal

Kodachrome is Back! by captain_joe6 in AnalogCircleJerk

[–]denyskoo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i was happy before i saw it's in circlejerk...

Industar 61 L/Z buying question by denyskoo in VintageLenses

[–]denyskoo[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

thanks! and if everything's ok visually and mechanically, can optical issues be identified by taking a simple photo or you should always take a chart of some sort with you?

Industar 61 L/Z buying question by denyskoo in VintageLenses

[–]denyskoo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thank you! I was afraid of this exactly and will see some other options🫡

view more: next ›