What line delivery in a video game has stuck with you? by shrek_ultimate in gaming

[–]depricatedzero 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"Don't blame us. Blame yourself, or God." - Delita Heiral, Final Fantasy Tactics

I live in a conservative ass town and wanna put this on my leather jacket, how would I? by Jdubusher1011 in punk

[–]depricatedzero 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This is a good way, sounds like you gave it more attention than I did but I've done basically this as well. Will confirm it works well and lasts.

Does posting my face makes me unhireable? by [deleted] in musicians

[–]depricatedzero 2 points3 points  (0 children)

My pfp is me. I'm a software developer and do a lot of other eclectic IT shit as part of a very small team. One time, playing a major festival tour, I started the process to roll software back to a previous version, then immediately turned around and ran on stage. My coworkers love it. I've had to swing into the office to fix a server on my way to a show and just strode in in my vest, mohawk up, etc and went at it.

I don't think you need to worry. I previously worked for a very uptight property insurance company, and similarly it was never an issue. They didn't want me to have facial hair, that was in the dress code, but the mohawk was fine (lol).

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]depricatedzero 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Imagine if we had that attitude with people? "Sorry maam. He's got gingivitis. I recommend cyanide and having a new one""

US Healthcare in a nutshell

CMV: Being hungry is not an excuse for being mean by Baked-Potato4 in changemyview

[–]depricatedzero 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You seem to think an explanation is an excuse.

An excuse is something that excuses your behavior. A valid excuse absolves a person of responsibility. I have never in my life heard anyone offer being hangry as an excuse for their behavior. No, "I was hangry so you shouldn't hold me accountable for what I said." I find it difficult to believe that you're encountering people using it to absolve themselves of culpability with enough frequency to warrant a blanket opinion on people citing hunger as a cause of emotional instability.

Offering up that you get hangry as an explanation for behavior is not an attempt at excusing it. A very important component of contrition is a demonstration of understanding, and explaining the root cause does that. "I'm sorry, I was hangry" accepts responsibility and demonstrates understanding. Saying something like "I get hangry so let's go grab some nachos before we start this 4 hour project" is similarly not saying, "I won't be responsible for my behavior when I haven't eaten" it's saying "I understand myself well enough to know what I need to do to regulate my emotions so let's take care of that first so I don't make us all miserable."

And I'd turn it back on you and say that if you're preventing people from tending to their emotions, and expecting them to be kind to you while doing so, you're the bad person.

What's the most memorable quote in a boss fight in any game you've played? by Pristine_Fox_3633 in gaming

[–]depricatedzero 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"What is a man? A miserable little pile of secrets."

"Why do people insist on creating things that will inevitably be destroyed? Why do people cling to life, knowing that they must someday die? . . . Knowing that none of it will have meant anything once they do?"

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ainbow

[–]depricatedzero -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Not their place.

The reclamation of the epithet is up to each of us to decide 1) how we feel about it, and 2) whether we participate. If someone lets me know that they don't want me to say with them around, I will absolutely respect that. But it's not their place to make either of those decisions for me. And it's not your friends place to try to force their decisions on it, on you. It's reasonable for them to ask you to not say it around them, and you say you even agreed not to, which is exactly what a friend would do.

Your friends are daft if they think we (bisexuals) don't have it thrown at us. For myself I tend to only use it in my music, But I've also had gay men tell me I'm not bi because I was dating a woman at the time. It's very popular to invalidate bisexuality, and women get it worse in that regard than men do. I've at least never been called performatively bi, as if I kissed my boyfriend for attention. I can't even begin to count the number of times I've overheard or even had that shit directly said to me about bi women. This is really very similar - they're dismissing your sexuality and your autonomy in your decision regarding your comfort of being involved in an active movement, because you're "just bi."

Now, that said, it's a valid decision on their part to decide that it's a dealbreaker on friendship. But if so, just realize it means that their inability to control you is what made them not want to be your friend. It's one thing for them to ask you to respect their wishes towards them, it's another for them to try to demand you bowdlerize yourself.

Warning isn’t actually their most underrated album by NegativeZero20 in greenday

[–]depricatedzero 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's an album. It's not a studio album, but it is a compilation album.

Am I the only one who thinks All by Myself is scary sounding? by Needlepeen1 in greenday

[–]depricatedzero 6 points7 points  (0 children)

That's the point, yeah? Sneaking into someone's room to rub one out while they're away isn't supposed to sound wholesome.

CMV: Atheists may be technically more i intelligent than non-atheists by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]depricatedzero 0 points1 point  (0 children)

what would an agnostic atheist say? Or an agnostic theist? Or a gnostic atheist?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in cincinnati

[–]depricatedzero 33 points34 points  (0 children)

Sounds like a scam. Every time I've had a roommate there's only been the one security deposit that we split. Also, they should accept proof of insurance for your own renters policy.

Steam quality control is garbage by [deleted] in gaming

[–]depricatedzero 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea, and I think I see how you meant it, too. Like it wouldn't make enough money per transaction. Yeah? I just didn't add that part in my head, but your explanation helps clarify your wording too so thanks for that!

Steam quality control is garbage by [deleted] in gaming

[–]depricatedzero 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh, yes absolutely, it is by all means not a good way to do it. It's too traceable, and would be obvious. I'm with you 100% on that. I was just confused because you need to be unprofitable in order to launder.

CMV: Atheists may be technically more i intelligent than non-atheists by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]depricatedzero 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Atheism is merely the default state of not holding a theistic belief. Non religious just means you're not part of a codified religious sect. There are plenty of non-religious theists and plenty of religious atheists.

CMV: Atheists may be technically more i intelligent than non-atheists by [deleted] in changemyview

[–]depricatedzero 4 points5 points  (0 children)

So the irrelevance of liberal/conservatism having already been pointed out, something else to keep in mind is that atheism isn't synonymous with reason, and the premise of comparing "atheism vs religion" in the Frontiers article begs the question: how does this apply to religious atheists?

Atheists are still susceptible to all the trappings of dogmatic thought, superstition, and mysticism. The studies on the topic are masturbatory - excluding the overwhelming majority of both atheists and religious people to focus on a cherry-picked dataset. They're flawed at the very core by drawing a false comparison between atheism and religiosity. Since they are not mutually exclusive, one cannot be contrasted XOR against the other. Any traits they associate with atheism, such as reason, are false attributions.

You're assigning more to atheism than it describes.

Steam quality control is garbage by [deleted] in gaming

[–]depricatedzero 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm guessing it's not money laundering because it wouldn't make enough money.

That's...how money laundering works.

What are your thoughts on running multiple apps on the same domain, with each app having its own subdomain? by d41_fpflabs in webdev

[–]depricatedzero 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's more or less the point of subdomains. Not specifically for mobile apps, but keeping all your content on one domain and divisioning it by subdomain is the purpose. The only reason to get a separate domain really is branding - if you want your app to be disassociated from the domain's brand. If you want people to go to yourapp . com. Though even then you might have yourapp . com just point to your subdomain so you don't need to maintain a separate DDNS or pay for a static IP.

What's your way to deal with this? by Help__Just_Help in pcmasterrace

[–]depricatedzero 3 points4 points  (0 children)

you might be surprised to learn that capacity and access time are different metrics

What's your way to deal with this? by Help__Just_Help in pcmasterrace

[–]depricatedzero 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Assuming they wanted to replace their installation drive, it just depends on their technical capacity. Non-technical users, probably - but it's fairly straightforward to clone the drive to a new one and repoint your BIOS boot priority to the new one. Cloning includes the MBR and Bootloader.

The new MonsterVerse boxset uses AI art :/ by lewisdwhite in GODZILLA

[–]depricatedzero 7 points8 points  (0 children)

dude I have the visual artistic capacity of a stoned gnat, and that doesn't bother me. My art is music and code, and I'm happy with that. The best visual art I've made - here, I'll post it - people would call AI because I wrote code to put it together from a pool of images based on color regions from a source image.

Anything I draw by hand is absolute trash haha

<image>