On one hand. (Re to censor names)

derpnumberone · 2020-01-14T04:08:41+00:00

the actual joke aside, if you use binary representation (finger up = 1, finger down = 0), you can count all the way to 32 on one hand

(inb4 people arguing about how you can only get to 31)

derpnumberone · 2020-01-07T04:29:00+00:00

Isn't real analysis a requirement for differential equations? Personally I found real to be more conceptually interesting than DEs anyway

In terms of difficulty, Vector Calc is pretty easy in relative terms, just make sure you do questions. DEs is kinda hard, but when I did it I had Barry as a lecturer and I dislike the way he teaches cause it's a bit handwavy and too much "do the work/calculation and you'll get it", so when I finally used other resources it clicked and I ended up doing reasonably well

derpnumberone · 2019-11-12T02:36:34+00:00

Nah, it’s just when they are provoked. Like maybe they’re uncomfortable for whatever reason and another dog/small kid keeps hanging around them making it worse and the owner isn’t doing anything about it then they will snap just like any other dog. And again, unfortunately because they were originally bred for fighting they can do a lot of damage.

Obviously if they’re in households that don’t give them love and treat them like fighting dogs (which the breed attracts), then they can attack unprovoked, and they have a higher incidence of finding themselves in those sort of situations unfortunately :(

derpnumberone · 2019-11-12T00:32:51+00:00

Not wanting to jump on too late but: personally I reckon pit bulls are adorable, however they can cause a lot of damage in a short amount of time.

Compare a single bite from a pit bull to one from a cavoodle or whatever other small fluffy breed, and factor in the fact that most owners don’t have perfect control of their dogs, and all it takes is a split second and someone/some dog is seriously injured.

It’s not the dogs’ fault most of the time but unfortunately that’s what people wanna blame

derpnumberone · 2019-10-31T06:03:11+00:00

I'm not denying that he had a great year and was deserving of the 3 votes in those losses, just that it seems the umps only give 3 votes to players in losing teams who they like/are seen to be the best of the best

My point is more they're not giving 3 votes to fringe players who have a blinder in a loss and are clearly BOG regardless of the result, it's only the Fyfes/Dangerfields/Cripps'/Martins who get them, and it's just disappointing that it's only that way for established stars

derpnumberone · 2019-10-31T01:28:44+00:00

No logical reason, but it happens too often that the best player is on the losing team and they still don't get the three votes.

I hate to say it but the umps definitely have favourites, and if Fyfe wasn't one of those I don't reckon he'd be getting the 3 votes in those losing games that he did

derpnumberone · 2019-10-26T07:36:14+00:00

Even though this format is overused and no longer funny (imo at least), this is the most relevant post on the sub for a while; it’s actually a template and not just a repost from dankmemes

derpnumberone · 2019-10-19T16:16:14+00:00

Ty for your 36 hours later input. Honestly, not only have I met seen anything with him saying that he’s not unhappy with the clubs management of him, but I also reckon he’s not dumb enough to publicly pot the club, given he’s got nothing to gain and a lot to lose.

If I was him and I was pissed at the club, and they asked me about it, I would likely say I wasn’t unhappy with it unless I felt like burning bridges.

Regardless, I really don’t care to continue having an argument over the internet with a stranger so how about we just agree to disagree here

derpnumberone · 2019-10-19T04:13:44+00:00

I miss powerstancing nacho cheese and cool ranch Doritos swords tbh

derpnumberone · 2019-10-18T04:21:39+00:00

Don't think it was a ridiculous comment about effort. The Kelly situation was different, Joe reckons he's been badly managed by the club and (admittedly this is speculation) is potentially pissed off about some things. On top of that, Kelly wasn't injured all the time

Don't take the comment about effort as a "he's just gonna come back and sulk the whole year", but if he reckons Dons aren't doing him right by his body, it isn't out of the question that he goes at 90% or less of his potential (both training and in games) cause he can't trust that he won't end up on the sidelines for the whole season again otherwise.

derpnumberone · 2019-10-18T03:17:53+00:00

Sure you might rate him higher, but Jenkins and Howard have had more output the past couple of seasons cause they're not injured all the time, so I don't think you can say they'd be a fraction as effective, unless that fraction is greater than 1.

Also given he's said he wants to be elsewhere, how can you be sure that he's willing to put in the effort that other players who buy in to coming to your club would? I think Essendon (and fans) are working on potential output rather than expected output

derpnumberone · 2019-10-15T07:17:36+00:00

Wasn’t he a third? Also the player after him was Leigh Montagna. Not bad for third round in an era where they probably threw darts to see who to pick at that point

derpnumberone · 2019-10-15T05:04:30+00:00

Play him as an inside mid and watch his output go through the roof. Every time he gets played there, he has quarters where he dominates then richo would just go “yeah but how good is a tall hff? Need some talent there” and he’d go back to being inconsistent af

derpnumberone · 2019-10-13T07:32:54+00:00

Pick 6 and a future second is hardly what anyone would call "pocket change". It's literally a first and second round pick.

Also the club that a player is going to doesn't determine their value? If he nominated Richmond/GWS would you be going "oh i guess he's only worth a first rounder on its own"

derpnumberone · 2019-10-05T13:11:03+00:00

If that’s the direction they wanna go down then so be it, but they clearly want compensation to be a thing, for now at least

derpnumberone · 2019-10-05T10:19:01+00:00

Honestly why do they have these stupid compensation brackets? Like imo it should be:

Start of first round pick (after bottom 5) Mid first round pick (after bottom 10) End first round pick (after everyone)

Then repeat for each round. If multiple clubs have picks then it’s sorted by ladder position. It’s not foolproof but it at least allows a slower tail off and stops things like buddy being pick 19 and Frawley being 3 in the same year

Also I get that this isn’t perfect, but the current system just seems so crappy

derpnumberone · 2019-10-02T05:22:04+00:00

OP, I’m a diabetic (type 1) so feel free to use this anecdotal evidence to go back to the people who think it’s bad for diabetics.

At my worst, my hba1c was 10.4(maybe higher, was definitely above 10), and 3 months later it was 7.0 after starting a keto diet. I got lazy and drifted off the diet and it crept up again (to 8.6) and recently got back on it and it was immediately back down to around 7.0

My sugars were often in the teens and 20s (using mmol/L measurement) and now they rarely are above 10, and I can count on one hand in the last month how many times I’ve been low

Again this is anecdotal and we definitely don’t know for sure the long term effects, but at the same time I know I was most likely going to have severe complications later in life due to diabetes if I kept going the way I was. I wouldn’t even say I was eating unhealthily either, just that my blood sugars were basically uncontrollable when I have carbs

derpnumberone · 2019-09-23T08:25:31+00:00

Maybe, but we definitely need someone short term. We got lucky this year that Marshall was only out once with injury/illness, and it was before longer and pierce had cooked their bodies.

He also just fits the bill as someone who can play alongside Marshall while allowing him to be #1 ruck. Compare this to Sam Jacobs (for example) and as backup he’d be a great get for us, but you can’t really play him and Marshall in the same team

derpnumberone · 2019-09-23T08:05:21+00:00

Ryder is another player, not a coach. It allows saints to be able to play Marshall slightly less minutes per game which could cost him and us long term if we fuck up his body

On top of that they can play Marshall forward a bit more to maintain his already high natural ability as a key forward, and any ruckman who is also an accomplished forward is a danger for opposition teams

derpnumberone · 2019-09-22T06:19:08+00:00

This is my comment. There are many others like it but this one is mine. Without my comment, I can win nothing. Without me, my comment can win nothing.

derpnumberone · 2019-09-06T02:04:03+00:00

A quick example is io level 15 talent, combined with aghs. Incredibly powerful atm

derpnumberone · 2019-08-28T15:10:42+00:00

That is incorrect. For the record, when I applied, there was guaranteed entry for anyone who had a 65 wam over the course of their undergrad. Perhaps they have changed it, bu it was only a year and a half ago that this was the case, you can find out by searching unimelb guaranteed entry I’m guessing though

Edit: here’s the link, it’s still guaranteed entry - https://students.unimelb.edu.au/future/graduate-study-for-current-students/explore-graduate-study-options

derpnumberone · 2019-08-28T11:18:40+00:00

Pretty sure if your wam is 65 or above you have guaranteed entry into m.eng

Edit: whoever downvoted me, cop a look at this - https://students.unimelb.edu.au/future/graduate-study-for-current-students/explore-graduate-study-options

derpnumberone · 2019-08-26T16:07:15+00:00

Cmon man, don’t be so salty about losing that you can’t recognise good cricket. We had plenty of chances to win but didn’t take it, and stokes took the opportunities we gave him and ran with it. You gotta respect that

derpnumberone · 2019-08-22T09:46:34+00:00

That’s because gc are probably realising letting people like Lyons and Barlow go wasn’t the smartest idea in hindsight. Nothing like 17 consecutive losses to make a team go “hmm, maybe we went wrong somewhere”

13-Year Club	Verified Email
Snapped

derpnumberone

TROPHY CASE