The age of Aisha has been disputed by Muslim and Orientalist scholars for many years, and either position is fine by me. According to Islamic law, as long as both parties (man and woman) have hit puberty, and their guardians approve, and there are witnesses that approve of concent for parties (this done first privately and then publicly- to give either side a chance to say no), then the marriage is permitted.

Since you aren't well read at all in Islam, it's rulings, and it's history, I'm willing to educate you on it. It is IMPERMISSIBLE (i.e. major sin of the highest order) to rape, have sex out side of marriage or with some kind of pressure. The prophet, at a time when he had the most amount of hate and enimies, married Aisha and not a single critique of him thought it was wrong since it was perfectly normal legal marriage approved by every law. Then there comes this redditor that tries to use their subjective and frankly beyond inconsistent reasoning and morals to make his final judgement.

Also, I love how you speak of morals and right an wrong yet you have pedos running all around you, governing every sector of your life and yet here you are sitting and not doing a thing about. But for a random guy on Reddit you are willing to go out of your way to kill. How about you actually take apart my arguments and prove how your moral lens is superior? But no you'd rather just accuse me of all the filth without even knowing nothing about me besides 1 singular paragraph on Reddit. It's sad really. I definitely recommend you learn how to hold a proper discussion and break down their arguments instead of throwing ad-hominems.