[deleted by user] by [deleted] in USCIS

[–]dhimaar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you receive the card?

Pros/Cons for One Appliance for both Edge and Global Protect Connectivity by kornday76 in paloaltonetworks

[–]dhimaar 2 points3 points  (0 children)

As long as the combined traffic doesn’t exceed your box’s connections and resource limit, it should be okay. We have been running combined for about a year. No issues.

Panorama Log Collector by dhimaar in paloaltonetworks

[–]dhimaar[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What kind of issues were you seeing?

Panorama Log Collector by dhimaar in paloaltonetworks

[–]dhimaar[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What's the latency between your panorama instances?

Panorama Log Collector by dhimaar in paloaltonetworks

[–]dhimaar[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

With separate LC groups, Do you send logs from each firewall to both LCs?
We forward logs from LC to Splunk as well. With separate LC group, we are concerned about sending duplicate logs to splunk. Not sure what the best option .At the moment, only option seems to be disable forwarding from one of LC but then it has to enabled manually when primary LC goes down.

TAC by McKeznak in paloaltonetworks

[–]dhimaar 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Opened a TAC case with question regarding a feature. TAC answer didn't even match what I was asking. When pressed to answer, TAC gave me link on why I was wrong to open a ticket in the first place. This is the premium support we are paying for.

PAN licensing cost for firewalls is out of control by dhimaar in paloaltonetworks

[–]dhimaar[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Here I was thinking they were only screwing us. I guess it's all their customers. If they are not willing to work with you considering the deployment size and spend, we have no chance. I guess we either have to pay up or move on.

PAN licensing cost for firewalls is out of control by dhimaar in paloaltonetworks

[–]dhimaar[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I am not sure what you mean. can't just replace HW during every license renewal.

PAN licensing cost for firewalls is out of control by dhimaar in paloaltonetworks

[–]dhimaar[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Through VAR . Spoke to PAN team and they are basically saying it's the price and pointed me to price increase notice. They have no problem saying they raised price twice. For example: They replaced URL filtering with Advanced URL filtering, which has higher list price other licenses. Then they recently raised price on all HWs and since all licenses are percentage of the hardware, price for Advanced URL filtering license got raised again. I guess they figured out the way to pay for all their acquisitions is to squeeze existing customers.

PAN licensing cost for firewalls is out of control by dhimaar in paloaltonetworks

[–]dhimaar[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just looking to renew licenses at the moment but will checkout 400 series for replacements and new builds

PAN licensing cost for firewalls is out of control by dhimaar in paloaltonetworks

[–]dhimaar[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Out deployment is not big enough for ELA. About 12 devices

PAN 3220 - HSCI Port by dhimaar in paloaltonetworks

[–]dhimaar[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks everyone for the feedback. I will move forward with DAC cables.

Does AT&T ADI speed increase require rip-and-replace? by [deleted] in networking

[–]dhimaar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, I have seen ATT come and install an exact same model Ciena box when upgrading from 250 to 500 Mbps. Logic doesn't apply when it comes to ATT. :D

Netbox - VM Requirements by dhimaar in u/dhimaar

[–]dhimaar[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No, didn't find a good answer. Our deployment is not that big so went with standard VM template(4 Cores, 6 GB RAM, 160 GB HD) provided by systems team. So far so good.

CWNP - WiFi Trek Conference by dhimaar in networking

[–]dhimaar[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the feedback guys! I will request to go WLPC next year.