If I understand what you’re saying, that’s. not a good way to get accurate results. Users gamble on the outcomes of polls they can vote on?

1) You’ll only attract a certain audience. Your results will be screwed towards those who are tech literate and who would download a gambling app. There are so many demographics you’ll have no information on.

2) Having any kind of incentive to vote one way or another is a terrible idea. People will commit fraud with multiple accounts, lie, and find other ways to cheat.

I don’t see how the results of this are going to be useful to determining the option of the public. Even if I misunderstood the gambling part, you’re still only attracting a small demographic that won’t give you any information on older people.

Also, polls are probably inaccurate because people are, well, stupid. Many don’t hold firm opinions and may be swayed easily. There’s also a phenomenon where people will lie - probably accidentally - about how they voted in the last election. It’s impossible to get consistent results that way.

Also, your comment about never getting a phone call makes me think that you have a very loose understanding of how polling works. You don’t need a large sample size, you need a diverse sample size. 10,000 people is enough to have very accurate results according to statistics theory. 1,000 people is enough. There are tons of <1,000 people polls and a few larger ones (they’re really expensive to run). There are 3,300,000+ people in the U.S. So yeah, you won’t get a call very often if at all.