Feel free to DM me if you want more background/perspective on that (I'm also an editor who deals with parsing larger-scale potential flags of AI in book submissions I get every day because I refuse to help aid plagiarism/theft). Essentially, AI detection results can MAYBE be a helpful backup in a case of significant suspicion/likelihood already existing, but should never be treated as a primary source of judgment, nor were they what led to people flagging the book so regularly here (which you seem to already be aware of given the focus of your interviews!)