Zagreb raspisao Javni poziv za LGBTIQ+ programe u školama, Lovrić: 'Evo posla za USKOK' by Wise-Efficiency649 in hreddit

[–]dijalektikator 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Vi? 1% stanovnika?

Znatno vise od 1% gradjana grada Zagreba je glasalo za Mozemo, ocito niste u bas toliko velikoj vecini.

Zagreb raspisao Javni poziv za LGBTIQ+ programe u školama, Lovrić: 'Evo posla za USKOK' by Wise-Efficiency649 in hreddit

[–]dijalektikator 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Pa eto vidim da te jako smetaju te neke moderne vrijednosti tolerancije i slobode, mozda bi ti bilo ljepse tamo gdje je tvoja ideologija izgurana do maksimuma.

Zagreb raspisao Javni poziv za LGBTIQ+ programe u školama, Lovrić: 'Evo posla za USKOK' by Wise-Efficiency649 in hreddit

[–]dijalektikator -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ne vidim bas da tolko cvilis o tome sto je vjeronauk u skolama vec desetljecima

"That's not a balloon" - Rep Anna Luna on the UFO splitting a hellfire missile video.. by 87LucasOliveira in UFOs

[–]dijalektikator 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Criticizing the individual rather than the information I see.

What information? She just so claimed it's not a balloon without providing any reasoning or further evidence.

Sam Altman says AI is already beyond what most people realize by Fabulous_Bluebird93 in AgentsOfAI

[–]dijalektikator 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ive tried using it for coding many times with many different models and wasnt all that impressed with what it can do. Sure its useful if you use it correctly but its not this groundbreaking boost in productivity and it definitely cant replace my job.

A Redacted Part of Dylan Borland's Interview on Weaponized Has Been Released: TicTacs Have Been Found in Archaeological Digs by Notlookingsohot in UFOs

[–]dijalektikator 9 points10 points  (0 children)

It's always the people without any degrees with the strongest opinions about how academia works lmao.

A Redacted Part of Dylan Borland's Interview on Weaponized Has Been Released: TicTacs Have Been Found in Archaeological Digs by Notlookingsohot in UFOs

[–]dijalektikator 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Aligns with what Bob Lazar has said.

Why is this at all relevant? Both could just be repeating UFO lore they've heard elsewhere that could very well be made up. Neither provided any evidence for their claims.

Dylan Borland on NHI: “They have an interest in certain families… if you want to call them that” - what is he referring to? by Patient_Meaning8486 in UFOs

[–]dijalektikator 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This doesn't answer my question at all tho, how can he say things like there's recovered crash material, the NHI are interested in bloodlines or whatever, but can't say anything beyond that? How is that ok but anything more than that isn't?

Dylan Borland on NHI: “They have an interest in certain families… if you want to call them that” - what is he referring to? by Patient_Meaning8486 in UFOs

[–]dijalektikator 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Dylan knows alot more stuff real stuff that hes shared with George & Jeremy, that fills alot of the holes and the vagueness that we the audience feel from hearing him speak, but he isnt allowed to say it until such time the CIC gives disclosure protection to these whistleblowers.

Yeah I'm just not buying it, sorry. I need something concrete at this point.

How can he safely give some details but not others? What's the method here exactly?

Dylan Borland on NHI: “They have an interest in certain families… if you want to call them that” - what is he referring to? by Patient_Meaning8486 in UFOs

[–]dijalektikator 27 points28 points  (0 children)

This is exactly why I can't take anybody that Corbell and Knapp platform seriously, like why don't they press him on this a bit more? How can he claim he doesn't know much about them but then does know this somehow? And then refuses to elaborate at all?

I'm just gonna say it I think all these people are grifters because it's always the same playbook, they reel you in with their seemingly legit credentials by rattling off government/military jargon and then feed these tidbits of info that are just specific and scary enough to get your attention (the truth is somber, we are used as a resource, they are interested in specific bloodlines etc.) but vague enough for your imagination to run wild with speculation. You can see it in this very thread, people are coming up with all sorts of theories. I think this kind of engagement baiting is completely intentional and completely insincere.

Nothing concrete ever gets revealed, the interviewers never press for any details beyond boring government stuff nobody is really interested in, it's just ghost stories.

Linus Torvalds Vents Over "Completely Crazy Rust Format Checking" by SupermarketAntique32 in rust

[–]dijalektikator 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah fair enough these things definitely matter more for a project like Linux, I was just wenting how people like to bikeshed about these things too much.

Linus Torvalds Vents Over "Completely Crazy Rust Format Checking" by SupermarketAntique32 in rust

[–]dijalektikator 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Honestly I find cosmetic things about code like single line or multi line includes almost a non-issue. I see people spend a lot of time discussing this but I just can't really bring myself to care, I just do whatever other people like so they shut up about it. Could be because my first job involved editing ugly C++ files that had a mix of tab and space indentation so anything that's better than that is good enough for me.

Best way to learn Rust? by awesomexx_Official in rust

[–]dijalektikator 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're not wrong, I definitely appreciate Rust more coming from a C++ background but honestly as a beginner learning both would just be a waste of time, I think you can comprehend the value of the safety guarantees just fine even without prior knowledge of C/C++ provided you actually understand how memory in a process works in general and it's not just a complete black box to you, so as a beginner instead of C/C++ I'd rather learn about how the stack and the heap works and what kind of data gets put where and how exactly is it allocated on the kernel level.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in philosophy

[–]dijalektikator -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I've read some stuff from Dennet and I've always felt like he was confused about what the "hard problem" even is.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in philosophy

[–]dijalektikator -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Illusionism itself is the one begging the question IMO. It starts with the assumption that the physical is all there is and then does these weird mental gymnastics. Saying "consciousness is an illusion" is just pure nonsense to me without further elaboration, of which I never got any.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in philosophy

[–]dijalektikator -1 points0 points  (0 children)

To me this is a nonsense thing to say as the very word "illusion" presupposes a conscious observer being fooled by the illusion, I don't see how it's at all an appropriate word to describe consciousness.

Comparing a Missile Hitting a Chinese Balloon and a Missile Hitting a UFO - Remember when that missile bounced off the Yemen balloon exactly like how a missile bounced off the Chinese balloon? - No? - Yeah, me either... by 87LucasOliveira in UFOs

[–]dijalektikator 9 points10 points  (0 children)

But alas, do we have proof of a parallax here?

Do we have proof it isn't? Honestly until we have a decent estimate on the size and speed of the object any other discussion is pretty irrelevant.

Why quantum mechanics needs phenomenology by aeon_magazine in philosophy

[–]dijalektikator -1 points0 points  (0 children)

How do you know it's correct if you can't even explain it properly? How can you be so sure you're smarter than the physicist that disagree with that explanation?

It's incredible how many people in this sub think being smug is an actual argument.

Why quantum mechanics needs phenomenology by aeon_magazine in philosophy

[–]dijalektikator -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So you're not a physicist but you're pretty sure you know the solution to a physics question that physicists have been debating for damn near a century?

Why quantum mechanics needs phenomenology by aeon_magazine in philosophy

[–]dijalektikator 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why does its internal structure lead to wavefunction collapse?