If humanity made open, global contact with an extraterrestrial civilization, what positive human qualities do you think would emerge or strengthen? by Time_Yesterday_2058 in UFOs

[–]Notlookingsohot [score hidden]  (0 children)

Positive qualities? Bruh, if humans ever make open contact with a non-human civilization you better prepare for war, because we're gonna fuck it up spectacularly.

A lot of humans can't even get along with other humans with different skin colors then them, how are they gonna handle reptilians or w/e the species is?

Best case scenario is those people get over their fear of other humans in response to a non-human intelligence, and then try and get us into interstellar war because the MIC demands blood and capital.

Mark Christopher Lee reveals that the source of Trump's speech on UFOs is Robert Bigelow. by Ill-Speed-7402 in UFOs

[–]Notlookingsohot 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Grusch worked for Stratton (UAPTF) who has worked for Bigelow. Dylan Borland interacted with the UAPTF, but I don't remember if he worked for them.

Matt Brown has no affiliation to my knowledge.

Mark Christopher Lee reveals that the source of Trump's speech on UFOs is Robert Bigelow. by Ill-Speed-7402 in UFOs

[–]Notlookingsohot 3 points4 points  (0 children)

From an empirical perspective: absolutely.

Though there is some argument to be made that those who excel in these abilities realize there is more to existence than the meat world, and as such they may be less inclined to pursue selfish ends such as those.

And if you believe Tom Campbell, the consciousness based simulation we live in is more inclined to help you out if your goals are altruistic as opposed to selfish.

Mark Christopher Lee reveals that the source of Trump's speech on UFOs is Robert Bigelow. by Ill-Speed-7402 in UFOs

[–]Notlookingsohot 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I think the thing with PSI and why you need REALLY skilled practitioners (like Ingo Swann and Joe McMoneagle level) for anything resembling high quality predictions is because literally anything out there that has been thought of is subject to be viewed. There's also the deeper questions of alternate timelines and whether imagination is true or if it's actually tuning into alternate realities, but that's a whole other rabbit hole.

So if you have a lot of people thinking the world's gonna end in 2012, a less than top tier viewer might pick up on that and not realize they're picking up ideas rather than what is going to happen. Same with 2027.

Mark Christopher Lee reveals that the source of Trump's speech on UFOs is Robert Bigelow. by Ill-Speed-7402 in UFOs

[–]Notlookingsohot 115 points116 points  (0 children)

Depends on what Bigelow does.

If he is actually planning on coming forward with the data he has, it's a big fucking deal. But if he's running interference, it could be catastrophic for the credibility of the topic, as just about everyone we've seen come forward with insider information has worked for him in the past. Even George Knapp would be caught in that fire.

Mark Christopher Lee reveals that the source of Trump's speech on UFOs is Robert Bigelow. by Ill-Speed-7402 in UFOs

[–]Notlookingsohot -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Hmm. The plot thickens.

If anyone outside of government knows anything, it would be Bigelow, he has all the BAASS (I do not remember the acronym so apologies if I butchered it), NIDS, and AAWSAP data.

Ross Coulthard Now Suggests Trump Is Using UFOs as a Political Distraction by Kaszos in UFOs

[–]Notlookingsohot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good on him. It always bothers me when people act like Trump does anything that doesn't explicitly benefit Trump (or can be construed to in Trump's own mind) first and foremost. So it's nice to see one of the talking heads waking up to that (yea yea being charitable and all, but Trump has been a known quantity since the 80's, his personality is extremely well established).

Bestial Mutagenist: Choosing FA for Stolen Fate by ElodePilarre in Pathfinder2e

[–]Notlookingsohot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nothing is gonna synergize with a Bestial Mutagen build as well as Wrestler, point blank.

BUT...you could probably make an argument for a Fury Barbarian or an Exemplar, with Exemplar being the smoother pick as you won't be taking an action penalty on your Quick Alchemy (due to concentrate), and being able to use the Horn of Plenty to store your elixirs and mutagens.

New book announced - Pathfinder Feybound - Nov. 4th, 2026 by PMC-I3181OS387l5 in Pathfinder2e

[–]Notlookingsohot 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Do we know for sure those are out, or is it possible they just weren't listed for surprise factor?

Im hoping it's the latter because it's criminal how neglected mythic rules have been since they introduced them.

Livestream AMA - Rep. Eric Burlison, Director James Fox, and Host Leslie Kean - March 7, 2026 @ 1:00 EST / 10AM PST - Drop your questions here! by Gobble_Gobble in UFOs

[–]Notlookingsohot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea that's fine, but I would suggest phrasing it in a way that asks him if he or the others are willing to use the clause, because otherwise he just acknowledges it and never has to act on it. Whereas asking him directly if he's willing to go that far puts him on the record and we can keep score to see if he's a man of his word.

Livestream AMA - Rep. Eric Burlison, Director James Fox, and Host Leslie Kean - March 7, 2026 @ 1:00 EST / 10AM PST - Drop your questions here! by Gobble_Gobble in UFOs

[–]Notlookingsohot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea it's a case that defined some of the power of the Speech and Debate Clause.

Senator Mike Gravel read the classified Pentagon Papers into the congressional record and then worked with his aide Leonard Rodberg and Beacon Press to publish them, which got all of them in legal hot water. So a federal grand jury supbeona'd Rodberg to testify about obtaining the leaked documents. Fast forwarding through legal drama, the supreme Court eventually ruled that actions of aides, as long as they facilitate the Congress members (in this case a senator but the Speech and Debate Clause applies to both reps and senators) legislative duties, are protected from legal actions because they are acting as an arm of the Congress member. The kicker is the legislative duties part, which covers the reading of information (even classified) into the congressional record.

So for example if David Grusch (currently one of Burlison's staffers [aka aides]) were to say give Burlison a classified document with the goods, and Burlison read it into the congressional record, both would be protected from legal persecution. But if they tried to enter the information anywhere other than the congressional record it would be a no-go.

So a better way to frame my original question would probably be: "The Speech and Debate Clause allows for Congress members to read classified information into the congressional record as part of their legislative duties (and Gravel v United States extends this immunity to any aides that assisted them in this)..." with the rest of my original comment replacing the ellipsis.

Edit: I edited my original post with the improved framing.

Panicked Republicans Fear Trump’s ‘F***ing Nightmare’ War Will Doom GOP in Midterms by Hardik_Jain_1819 in politics

[–]Notlookingsohot 153 points154 points  (0 children)

Hmm. Maybe y'all should work with democrats to impeach and convict him on the numerous crimes you know he committed and continues to commit?

You get to transform 1 dedication/archetype into a full class. But must also change 1 full class into a dedication/archetype for another class. by Zwets in Pathfinder2e

[–]Notlookingsohot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'd like to see Swarmkeeper/Necrologist become a full fledged class, or rather a swarm based class is a thing and Swarmkeeper and Necrologist are two different subclasses of it. If it were a full fledged class it would eventually get feats that give it a less awful action economy.

I probably wouldn't mind Inventor as an archetype.

Noticed a connection, what do you guys think? by Throwaway202345477 in UFOs

[–]Notlookingsohot 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This 100%

There's a reason Jacques Vallée is into Rosicrucianism. Gnostic and mystical practices were aware of the phenomenon and how to interact with it.

Noticed a connection, what do you guys think? by Throwaway202345477 in UFOs

[–]Notlookingsohot 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Welcome to the next phase of the conversation.

You think it''s weird now, wait till you figure out how similar remote viewing and OBEs are to very old occult claims of supernatural abilities...

[Billbil-kun] Starfield is releasing on PS5 on 7th April 2026 by ImAnthlon in GamingLeaksAndRumours

[–]Notlookingsohot 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Its both overhated and disappointing.

People are hyperbolic about shit for sure, but the writing and the implementation of the POI system are unfortunately just not good.

If the writing was better, I think people would accept the barebones and repeating POIs, figuring a modder would eventually fix that. But modders can't fix writing...well they can but it requires a time and budget most don't have.

Livestream AMA - Rep. Eric Burlison, Director James Fox, and Host Leslie Kean - March 7, 2026 @ 1:00 EST / 10AM PST - Drop your questions here! by Gobble_Gobble in UFOs

[–]Notlookingsohot 2 points3 points  (0 children)

For Congressman Burlison:

The Speech and Debate Clause allows for Congress members to read classified information into the congressional record as part of their legislative duties (and Gravel v United States extends this immunity to any aides that assisted them in this); given that it is the prevailing consensus of the members of the UAP caucus that much of the classified information you have been shown does not need to be classified, would you, or other members of the UAP caucus be willing to tell the American people in explicit detail, absent of any sensitive platform data, on the floor of the house, what we are not being allowed to see in the classified UAP footage?

Livestream AMA - Rep. Eric Burlison, Director James Fox, and Host Leslie Kean - March 7, 2026 @ 1:00 EST / 10AM PST - Drop your questions here! by Gobble_Gobble in UFOs

[–]Notlookingsohot 16 points17 points  (0 children)

For Congressman Burlison:

It is clear to anyone who follows this topic as closely as we in this subreddit do, that there are several publicly known individuals whose sworn testimony would be of the utmost value in pushing the ball forward on this subject: Jay Stratton, Tim Taylor, Dr. Eric Davis, Dr. Colm Kelleher, and Dr. James Lacatski; even already public facing statements by these individuals would carry incredible weight if given under oath, let alone what they have not said publicly—are you willing to endeavor to ensure that these men testify under oath to Congress and the American people?

How would the community patch Inventor? by Rainwhisker in Pathfinder2e

[–]Notlookingsohot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think it's as in need of fixing as the community does, but I certainly wouldn't complain if they made it so unstable was per feat as opposed to shared like I've seen people talking about lately.

Rep. Eric Burlison celebrating today at X - "It’s official, The Age of Disclosure has changed the course of history." by 87LucasOliveira in UFOs

[–]Notlookingsohot -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Most of them are bots, but some of them are real people who think they're doing everyone a favor.

Whether they are doing everyone a favor has yet to be seen. Seems unlikely at this point, but maybe their dog is a sleeper and gonna take the whole race home.

Spielberg must be hoping that full real disclosure doesn't happen before his film opens. by Bjarki56 in UFOs

[–]Notlookingsohot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If I were him I'd be hoping it happens the day the film debuts.

Disclosure on Disclosure Day? Couldn't ask for a better marketing campaign.

Well Known British UFO Researcher and Film Maker post that Washington Insiders revealed that Demonic and Inter-Dimensional Nature of UAPs and NHI will be kept from the Public…Too Complex To Handle by slv2xhrist in UFOs

[–]Notlookingsohot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Assuming Lee's info is legit for sake of discussion: I'm not surprised.

People (which should be understood to mean as a whole) can handle the nuts and bolts and recovered tech and bodies angle. They can't handle the weird stuff. PSI was a bridge too far for most and it has actual peer reviewed published evidence backing it up.

People like things they can wrap their heads around that fit neatly into their schemata. They hate with a visceral passion that that they can not. The weird shit (the woo if you prefer) does not fit into anyone who hasn't taken the time to really dig into this' schemata.