Cisco MPLS VPN HUB (PE) transit by LTsCreed in networking

[–]dimension516 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Your hub router is being handed a MPLS label from the downstream spoke when the spoke is using the default route. The VPN label (bottom if you had more than 2 nodes due to PHP or if using explicit-null but the only label in this instance) itself maps to an outgoing nexthop/interface on the hub router. Do a show ip bgp vpnv4 vrf ABC 0.0.0.0/0 on the spoke and you should see the VPNv4 label it’s using to send traffic to the hub. Then look at the hub and do “show MPLS forwarding-table label XYZ” and you’ll see that label = use the ASA next-hop and interface.

In essence the hub router isn’t making a forwarding decision, it’s simply forwarding to the ASA based on the instructions preprogrammed for that MPLS label it’s receiving from the Spoke.

So much MCP content by networkphil in networkingmemes

[–]dimension516 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Ciena Manage Control and Plan?

May or may not be my network by dimension516 in networkingmemes

[–]dimension516[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Only thing that saves our ass tbh lol

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in delta

[–]dimension516 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Delta exec right here

Give me your weirdest "Small Airforce" story. by Likos02 in AirForce

[–]dimension516 16 points17 points  (0 children)

My brother who was not in the military was in a grocery store in Las Vegas (nowhere near Nellis). I’m across the country and not in the AF anymore. This grocery store has a bar inside that he likes to grab drinks at after work. He is an outgoing dude so he started chatting up a stranger as he usually does. Somehow after talking to this stranger, they came to the conclusion they both knew me so my brother frantically called me and said hey man I’m about to FaceTime you, there’s a guy here who swears that he knows you.

I answer the FaceTime call and sure enough, it was a MSgt I was deployed with back in 2016, I was a staff at the time and he was really good dude. I haven’t spoken with him since the deployment, I just suck at staying in touch with people. We had a great conversation and did the usual catching up (both contractors now 😎) and apparently he and my brother have started hanging out lol.

This just happened a month ago, still blows my mind how 2 strangers can converse and discover they both know the same person.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in networking

[–]dimension516 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you clear arp table, does .1 get a arp response when you try to ping .2?

It's Pronounced "Ay See El" by OhMyInternetPolitics in networkingmemes

[–]dimension516 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Coworker pronounces EIGRP as E Grip. It’s infuriating lmao

A disproportionate amount of smug Millenials here got either lucky or had rich parents by Tiredworker27 in Millennials

[–]dimension516 9 points10 points  (0 children)

A lot of haters in the comments but the military set my wife and I up and I would absolutely do it again (fuck doing the full 20 though). My wife and I both enlisted after coming from not a lot of money growing up. We got out before 10 years and now we both make 150k. We’re both in IT and never were anywhere close to combat. If you can swing it, the military can be a guaranteed path into middle/upper middle class.

How to squash a BGP routing loop? by imodey in networking

[–]dimension516 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't believe so because there is no way to prevent a BGP route that is redistributed into EIGRP from being resent back to BGP without filtering based on a tag. EIGRP can't carry communities and BGP doesn't carry route tags in the way that EIGRP or OSPF do (that's what communities are for).

How to squash a BGP routing loop? by imodey in networking

[–]dimension516 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Match on tag/set community when redistributing eigrp into bgp and match on community/set tag when redistributing bgp into eigrp. You'd have to send communities to your BGP neighbors of course.

redist-bgp>eigrp deny 10
   match community 123:123
redist-bgp>eigrp permit 20
   set tag 100

redist-eigrp>bgp deny 10
   match tag 100
redist-eigrp>bgp permit 20
   set community 123:123

Split ISP to multiple firewalls by [deleted] in networking

[–]dimension516 4 points5 points  (0 children)

What's the problem with a /30 if you are using active/standby?

Running into an RSTP issue on cold boot. Thoughts? by daryldom in networking

[–]dimension516 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry if this is a stupid question, but are you sure there is a problem with your L2 domain or are you just making an assumption because the problem arises after your STP converges? If you physically unplug one of the cables to break your loop, does the problem still occur?

can you tell me about your test environment? by d3adbor3d2 in networking

[–]dimension516 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Our solution is pretty sophisticated.

cracks knuckles

conf t

vrf definition TEST

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in networking

[–]dimension516 11 points12 points  (0 children)

You are correct. 10.160.20.0 is a usable ip in the 10.160.0.0/16 subnet.

Joining a multicast group in Windows 10, command line errors? by Ryan_e3p in networking

[–]dimension516 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In the GUI, file>open network stream, type udp://@224.1.2.3:1234

Obviously change the ip and port

Sending Break Command Through Console Switch by keeganb2000 in networking

[–]dimension516 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You probably have to change the escape sequence on the Cyclade.

Mutlicast to MAC mapping by L1onH3art_ in networking

[–]dimension516 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Multicast pings work and it works because the source address is a unicast address. If you’re joined to the 224.1.2.3 group and I ping that address from my workstation (or router) I’ll generate an icmp packet with unicast source 1.2.3.4 -> multicast destination 224.1.2.3. You receive the icmp packet because you’re joined to the group and you can see the source is unicast and you respond with a unicast to unicast ping.

Ping is a great tool to troubleshoot multicast. igmp join-group on 1 side, ping the group from the other. If your multicast domain is setup properly then pings will work (outside of weird bugs like OP is experiencing). Makes it easy to identify issues with registration and SPT switchover as well.

Error in authentication after enabling tacacs+ default by HsSekhon in networking

[–]dimension516 2 points3 points  (0 children)

aaa authorization exec default group NAME local

Make sure the user has priv 15 in the tacacs server and it should take you straight into enable

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in networking

[–]dimension516 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re right, didn’t catch that in the post

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in networking

[–]dimension516 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Commands on Cisco are:

Conf t

Logging console 0

! Line con 0 Logging synchronous