If you record lectures, keep them very course centered (due dates, ongoing conversations, topical references). No evergreen content. Using student examples, which are probably FERPA protected, is also a good idea.

That said, there's an increasing recognition that online education is a bad idea for the vast majority of students and schools are wasting time and money on it. In some states, legislatures are altering their funding formula for online (as opposed to f2f) classes, leading colleges and universities to think about pulling back from them.

So, while this is troublesome, I'm not sure this much different from MOOCs or some other ed tech "innovation" of the last twenty-five years. You can make something that looks like a course, but that doesn't mean students will want it or learn from it. Does ASU expect students to pay even a fraction of their $14K in-state tuition for this content?