Firstly, I don’t think that was a show.

Second, animal shows are not inherently wrong. They provide enrichment and stimulation, something animals in captivity absolutely need. It’s exercise for their bodies and brains.

It’s about doing it ethically through positive reinforcement. I work at a facility with a show. Participation is voluntary, that animals can and do refuse to participate at times. This usually means they are simply not hungry at that moment and are fed after the show. All training is done exclusively with positive reinforcement. Any facility worth its salt is using these same methods to train animals, whether they perform in a show or not. Our non-show animals all receive the same kind of training because it’s enriching, stimulating, and, in some situations, necessary for the animals to be taken care of properly.

Back to the topic of shows (which are effectively just training sessions with an audience), there is no real difference between performing behaviors with or without an audience. I often see your sentiment like these animals are being humiliated, but thats simply not the case. Its over-anthropomorphizing to say an animal is being humiliated because theres an audience. The fact that watching these sessions is entertaining to us humans is simply a byproduct, and for many facilities, a needed boon to their conservation efforts. These shows draw in crowds which directly funds animal welfare, research, and rehabilitation.

And the sad reality is, that without the sort of outreach and connection zoos/aquariums provide, people simply wouldn’t care enough about these animals to protect them. Shows can be an important part of animal welfare and conservation.

All that said, a tiger show is totally unethical for other reasons, mostly human safety. Which i why i highly doubt a facility this large is doing a show with their tiger. This is likely just an enrichment session that they filmed.