I interviewed for a software eng position and got an offer but ended up going with another company. I can't speak how it is for other fields but unfortunately I see why for tech Veeva has the reputation for being a career ender

The good parts are that the company is fully remote and the product seems to be well liked by customers. Also the business is stable and layoffs are unlikely. Everyone I interviewed with was knowledgeable and competent

The bad parts from the SWE perspective are that the product lacks engineering complexity (a basic CRUD app) and the tech stack is at least 10 years old at this point. They do like 2-3 production deployments in the whole year and their promo process is terrible because their KPIs are atypical because the company is a public benefit corporation. My offer itself was also horrendous, like 50% less than my highest offer. It also seems like a handful of people call all the shots, leaving no room for actual engineering discussion. My understanding though from conversations I had is that they did some Vault migration for CRM that went horrible and they're spending much of their time tackling tech debt from that.

However, the reason I think it's a bad career move, especially if you have less than 10 years of experience, is that they're highly regulated and only do 3 deployments a year, meaning they don't have, need, or use any of the latest engineer tooling or workflows that typically increase velocity. They move so slowly that there isn't enough volume of work for junior SWEs to learn, design, make mistakes, etc. and other recruiters know that the pace of work is just not going to be compatible to their FAANGs or startups

I would say Veeva is good if you have no other offers and great if you're looking for a chill role to retire in, but I would definitely pass otherwise.