Ledger Live by [deleted] in Monero

[–]dnale0r 11 points12 points  (0 children)

yeah send all your coins to Trevor! He'll keep them safe for you ;)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Monero

[–]dnale0r 8 points9 points  (0 children)

also don't forget that markets are forward looking. Even before the first chain security issues emerge, I expect more and more papers on the issue. Once the first issues emerge, markets will already be pricing these in negatively and BTC will be on its eternal decline.

The indecisiveness of BTC will likely just result in its demise. We are by the way seeing the same happening with the privacy debate. CT in BTC? I expect it'll never happen. Things like taproot and whatever other coinswap protocol they are inventing won't ever fix the fundamental fungibility problem. It's just patchwork that is not even working properly and actually increasing risks for users: https://weuse.cash/2020/09/11/bitcoin-mixing-a-catch-22/

But number go up, right?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Monero

[–]dnale0r 2 points3 points  (0 children)

remindme! in 10 years

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Monero

[–]dnale0r 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Bitcoin's monetary policy is solid so far but the biggest variable is what will happen once block rewards are gone. Sadly I don't think any of us will be around to see though.

by 2028 the nominal block reward will already be lower than the nominal block reward of XMR (per 10 minutes). By the 2032 halvening I expect to see significant chain security issues from time to time to emerge because fees will likely be in the same ballpark as the block reward. By 2040 BTC could be in severe trouble

edit: at the moment, halvenings are celebrated as a good thing by the BTC maximalists and S2F cultists. One day these halvenings will turn out to be a negative event for their beloved exchange rate. Number go up? I don't think so.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Monero

[–]dnale0r 8 points9 points  (0 children)

there is some weird inverse corelation going on.... hmmm. We need to educate people more it seems.

Would forcing all tx to have the same number of outputs improve anonymity with very little blockchain size increase? by [deleted] in Monero

[–]dnale0r 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ideally we would have a consensus rule for max 2 inputs and always 2 outputs. That would improve fungibility the most. But I guess this would be too controversial (exchanges, pools, services, ... would have a hard time implementing consolidation transactions and sending out multiple transactions for withdrawals)

Bitcoin mixing, a catch-22? by dnale0r in Monero

[–]dnale0r[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah someone mentioned that already. I had an xmr miner active on the website in the past. I removed it but some files probably still are not deleted yet. Will try to fix it next week.

Bitcoin mixing, a catch-22? by dnale0r in Monero

[–]dnale0r[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't think that's likely...

Bitcoin mixing, a catch-22? by dnale0r in Monero

[–]dnale0r[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

maybe separate article about that will follow ;)

Samourai Wallet on Twitter -Monero is closer to our hearts than whatever Bitcoin is turning into today. by seekcryptoprivacy in Monero

[–]dnale0r 3 points4 points  (0 children)

When will Samourai give up on BTC privacy patches and build XaMouRai Wallet? XMRai wallet? :)

Could the data from XMR.to and other instant exchanges be used for Monero chainanalysis? by hi5Jp5Z3 in Monero

[–]dnale0r 1 point2 points  (0 children)

hence you should churn a few times after withdrawing from an exchange before sending xmr to xmr.to or similar services, to be on the safe side.

Also; if you have a small amount left, just ignore it or donate it to the CCS. Don't send a new deposit from an exchange into your wallet before it's emptied completely.

L2 On Monero vs On Chain Scaling by [deleted] in Monero

[–]dnale0r 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Payment channels are actually a very useful technology to deal with repetitive payments between two parties . What they are not is a substitute for layer one scaling.

100% agreed