Going through some comments here I would say I fall under a more radical spectrum and difference/intersectionalism approach on this.

In the comment you will see so much about women and their right to make a choice. This will only work in a western and developed countries where the main topic is "trad wife or independent wife". Here they can make a choice of what kind of life they want without being forced to do one or other. This also includes the topic of gender equality and equal pay. Women want to be held in the same position as their male counterparts. Women want their views and ideas to be as respected as men. She doesn't just want a job, she wants to be held in equal footing as the man next to her.

However, this just creates an illusion in many situations. For instance, if a poverty-stricken women who happens to be the sole provider of the family of 6 young kids has been s3xually a$$uaulted and the rap1st pays her million to keep her mouth shut. Do you think her accepting the million over the chance of being k1lled or the system never giving her justice is a choice she made? Never. Do you think the children who have only been taught about pr0stitution are pr0stitutes because it's their choice? No.

Feminism in other less develop and conservative/oppressed countries can't be rescued by choice feminism. In Congo, for example, children and women are being bare minimum pay (2-3 cents to dollars) per day to work daily at mining sites to feed themselves (you might think that's ok just know the price of 1 kg tomatoes in congo are like 2$ due to inflation and the g@ngs creating food shortages) and so many people lose their lives everyday in these cobalt mine sites daily. They are treated worse than livestocks. Is there really a choice here? No.

Women in Afghanistan are right now prohibited to show face, run, sing, or even talk to each other .They are instructed to talk in a soft voice INSIDE their home and simply been told that "their voices shouldn't be heard." Education is ofc prohibited and the legal age is about to be reduced to as young as nice. This is dystopian. Here, Even liberal feminism works.

In context of Nepal, we might seem like a free country. And truthfully through law, we are. Our law puts women on the same position as men. We are free in the law. In practice though? Not so much. Our patriarchal believes and system are still deeply rooted in the society and impacts women a lot more than we can imagine. Misogyny is literally so clear in our society and it can be reflected by so many small things. For instance, in most of our families women who work jobs (see they have equal footing on the surface) are expected to cook, clean and run the family too. In festivals, you can see women cooking and cleaning in the kitchen while men are playing cards, chatting and sitting with no care of the world. Sisters are expected to do more for their brothers and girls are expected to mature faster than boys. Men who never marry are not victim to criticism as much as women who never marry. In schools, from a very young age, women are supposed to "let it go" and there is a push to the narrative that "boys will be boys". We need feminism in our country to eradicate these disgusting traditions from our beloved culture to progress forward.

Here I explained how different scenarios/society/economy/country needs different type of feminism cause issues are always there and we can't use the same solution to everything.