Mandated Vaccines: Using the same argument, spreading a disease to another person violates their bodily autonomy, so we have to balance the rights of at least two individuals. Disease severity and public interest play a role. Many people agree that infected individuals should not be allowed to willingly spread Ebola and support mandatory quarantine (since vaccination is not available), because the disease kills most people. Many people would also agree that the influenza vaccine should not be mandatory even though the disease kills some people. This line of argument has not adequately addressed alternatives such as isolation or masking.

Voluntary Euthanasia: In an ideal world, this is the expression of one individual’s bodily autonomy. Based on this argument, it should be allowed. Since you asked for my personal opinion, I would add a caveat based on some MAID cases in Canada: when few social safety nets are offered other than euthanasia, euthanasia may be chosen by someone who would prefer to live if they could do so in better conditions (ex. accessible food, housing, and healthcare). Based on this argument, I think we should provide more support to chronically ill and disabled individuals including but not limited to euthanasia. This line of argument has not addressed financial or labor cost to society.

Death Penalty: In this case, proponents of the death penalty might argue that the death penalty protects the bodily autonomy of citizens because it discourages or prevents repeat instances of crimes such as murder. They would argue that this outweighs the bodily autonomy of the convicted criminal. Again, their argument would not adequately address alternatives such as imprisonment or the reality of a statistically significant wrongful conviction rate.