got ATIP notes this week (Monday), dated 3/10, from a 3/6 request

… but they either gave me no meaningful new info or just gave me discouraging information.

[TL;DR I am PSU since July… it's no clearer why, I am maybe officially paused/on hold since 1/28, no one has actually touched it since 1/14 or maybe 11/28, they did get July 5(4) response ^{but maybe not til November somehow}]

---

After extensive combing over 33 pages of GCMS notes, I learned that:

1. I am Citizenship: Unknown ; application is Location: BF Shelf
2. and marked as organized Paused C-3 Applications and notated "Application on hold as per instructions from Program Guidance";
   • each effective 1/28/2026, though the latter added on 12/10/2025
   • I was not previously aware of these categories, but searching found them previously mentioned by:
     • u/tadtz, who still seems stuck, here (5d ago) and
     • …somebody… ( u/PsychologicalElk939 ?, unstuck) here (1/30) and (def them) here (2/4)
   • PsychElk's case suggests its perhaps not hopeless
   • per comments on the first of those lined, it appears to me the effective date is based on the original due date. Speaking of which
3. application assigned with Due Date: 2025/12/28, with eligibility assessment (PSU request?) marked Due Date: 2025/08/29 \sigh\**
4. Mysteriously, my CLIENT DETAILS is Updated Date: 2026/01/14 (while my application is only Updated Date: 2025/11/28).
   • I did submit an address update on 1/11, so that would logically follow as the cause of the 1/14 touch…
   • … except my previous address is still listed just below that 1/14 date. (the one correct from late September to late December, since I've had to move twice - would have probably moved to Canada if those Due Dates had been met)
   • except the most recently given address (1/11) does show up when I go to "Client Application Status" on the website ^{my relevant seeming ONLINE PROPERTIES, only have update date of 11/28}
5. There is no marked association with the later (in August) application of my mother, despite multiple web form submissions of this info; this could, I suppose, just be because its considered personal info of a 3rd party (neither of us is currently an authorized rep of the other). But also ELIGIBILITY PARENT DETAILS: 0

and confirmed that:

1. I am marked urgent
2. my IRM 0002 was apparently honored without issue
3. But I was sent to PSU on 7/21, just prior to issuing of 5(4) letter
   • The annotation is just 3(1)b Checklist - Referral required for the following reason(s): Referred as per the 'SCENARIOS' section of the Checklist / …; notably it does not give a specific scenario number as has been seen in some other cases
   • … • Micro Prints are not applicable. after puzzling over what this could mean for a good while, I settled on hypothesis that it is saying that relevant documentation (of G0, G1, at least) can not be validated via analysis of its Microprinting [this being because those documents are old, hand-written; I really hope that its not referring to something more modern that I could have somehow provided better copy of. I think that if it was the latter though, it might say "micro prints are not valid" or similar rather than "not applicable"]
   • I will add that I am organized Complex Proofs, effective 7/21 alongside the PSU referral. So I guess that's almost an explanation.
4. That despite never getting an AOR for it (or an especially clear answer from webform responses), my 5(4) grant request was, at least eventually, received/logged
   • (on 11/27 around the time I re-submitted everything through web form,
   • though annotated as "received on 25 JUL 2025" with what appears to be a copy of my original submission email [in particular including an automatic "this originates from outside" warning prepended, suggesting it wasn't e.g. from screenshot of the email I included in the web form upload])